UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨
Check the appropriate box:
¨    Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨    Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x     Definitive Proxy Statement
¨     Definitive Additional Materials
¨Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12
Science Applications International Corporation
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
 
x    No fee required.
¨    Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
 
1.Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
2.Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
3.Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
4.Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
5.Total fee paid:
¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
1.Amount Previously Paid:
2.Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
3.Filing Party:
4.Date Filed:


1.    Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
proxy2020cvbluea01.jpg2.    Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
3.    Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
4.    Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
5.    Total fee paid:
¨    Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨    Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
1.    Amount Previously Paid:
2.    Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
3.    Filing Party:
4.    Date Filed:



a21-0870xfy21_proxyxcvxf1a.jpg




saiclogorgbsma071a.jpg
12010 Sunset Hills Road
Reston, Virginia 20190

NOTICE OF VIRTUAL ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held June 3, 20202, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. (ET)
http://www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SAIC2020SAIC2021

The annual meeting of stockholders of Science Applications International Corporation ("SAIC"), a Delaware corporation, will be held on Wednesday, June 3, 2020,2, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. (ET) as a virtual meeting at http://www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SAIC2020.SAIC2021. We believe that a virtual annual meeting of stockholders provides greater access to those who may want to attend and, therefore, have chosen this over an in-person meeting. In addition, our Proxy Statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended January 31, 2020,29, 2021, are available at www.proxyvote.com. Information on these websites, other than these materials, is not a part of the proxy solicitation materials.
The annual meeting is being held for the following purposes:
1.To elect ten directors;
2.To conduct a non-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers ("Say-on-Pay");
3.To conduct a non-binding, advisory vote on the frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes;
4.To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 29, 2021; and
5.
1.    To elect ten directors;
2.    To conduct a non-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers ("Say-on-Pay");
3.    To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 28, 2022; and
4.    To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments, postponements or continuations of the meeting.
The foregoing items of business are fully described in our Proxy Statement made available on the internet and, upon request, in paper copy. Our Board of Directors has set the close of business on April 7, 2020,6, 2021, as the record date for the determination of stockholders who are entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting and at any and all adjournments, postponements or continuations thereof. A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be available for inspection at our headquarters, 12010 Sunset Hills Road, Reston, Virginia 20190, for at least 10 days prior to the meeting and will also be available for inspection at the meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors
stevemahonsignaturea171a.jpg
Steven G. Mahon
Corporate Secretary


Reston, Virginia
April 22, 2020
21, 2021
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
You are cordially invited to attend the virtual annual meeting via the following website: http://www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SAIC2020.SAIC2021. Whether or not you expect to virtually attend, please submit your proxy or voting instructions:
interneta161a.jpg
By Internet
telephonea111a.jpg
By Telephone
mla271a.jpg
By Mail
For specific instructions regarding how to vote, please refer to the questions and answers beginning on page 6 of this Proxy Statement or the instructions on the proxy and voting instruction card. Submitting a proxy or voting instructions will not prevent you from attending the virtual annual meeting and voting at the meeting if you so desire but will help us secure a quorum and reduce the expense of additional proxy solicitation.




SUMMARY INFORMATION

SUMMARY INFORMATION
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. It does not contain all the information that you should consider, and you should carefully read the entire Proxy Statement as well as our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended January 31, 2020,29, 2021, before voting.
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
• Time and Date:
9:00 a.m. (ET) on June 3, 20202, 2021
• Website:
http://www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SAIC2020SAIC2021
• Record Date:
April 7, 20206, 2021
• Voting:
Stockholders as of the record date are entitled to vote.
• Attendance:
All stockholders and their duly appointed proxies may attend the virtual meeting.
Meeting Agenda and Voting Recommendations
  Agenda ItemBoard RecommendationPage
Proposal 1: Election of ten directors.FOR EACH NOMINEE
9
Proposal 2: Approval of a non-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers ("Say-on-Pay").FOR
2826
Proposal 3: Approval of a non-binding, advisory vote on the frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes.FOR EVERY YEAR
29
Proposal 4: Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 29, 2021.28, 2022.FOR
5750
Board Nominees
The following table provides summary information about each director nominee. Each director nominee is elected annually by a majority of votes cast by our stockholders.
  NomineeAgeDirector SincePrincipal OccupationCommittees
Robert A. Bedingfield722013Former Global Coordinating Partner at Ernst & Young LLP
• Audit (Chair)
• Compensation
Carol A. Goode672019Private Consultant and Former Chief Human Resources Officer for Brocade Communication Systems
• Compensation
• Nominating
Garth N. Graham(1)
462021Director and Global Head of Healthcare for YouTube, LLC
• Compensation
John J. Hamre702013Chief Executive Officer and President of the Center for Strategic & International Studies; former U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense and Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller)
• Nominating
• Risk Oversight (Chair)
Yvette M. Kanouff552019Partner and Chief Technology Officer for JC2 Ventures
• Audit
• Risk Oversight
Nazzic S. Keene602019Chief Executive Officer of SAIC
• Risk Oversight
Timothy J. Mayopoulos622015President of Blend Labs, Inc.; former President & Chief Executive Officer at the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae)
• Audit
• Nominating (Chair)
Katharina G. McFarland612019Private Consultant and former Assistant Secretary of Defense (Acquisition), Dept. of the Army
• Nominating
• Risk Oversight
Donna S. Morea662013Chair of SAIC's Board; former President of U.S., Europe, and Asia for CGI Group
• Nominating
• Risk Oversight
Steven R. Shane632013Former partner at Accenture PLC
• Audit
• Compensation (Chair)
  NomineeAgeDirector SincePrincipal OccupationCommittees
Robert A. Bedingfield712013Former Global Coordinating Partner at Ernst & Young LLP
•   Audit (Chair)
•   Compensation
Carol A. Goode(1)
662019Private Consultant
•   Compensation
•   Nominating
John J. Hamre(2)
692013Chief Executive Officer and President of the Center for Strategic & International Studies; former U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense and Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller)
•   Nominating
• Risk Oversight (Chair)
Yvette M. Kanouff(3)
542019  Partner and Chief Technology Officer for JC2 Ventures
•   Audit
•   Risk Oversight
Nazzic S. Keene(4)
592019Chief Executive Officer of SAIC
•   Risk Oversight
David M. Kerko472019Former Executive at KKR
•   Audit
•   Compensation
Timothy J. Mayopoulos612015President of Blend Labs, Inc.; former President & Chief Executive Officer at the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae)
•   Audit
•   Nominating (Chair)
Katharina G. McFarland602019Private Consultant and former Assistant Secretary of Defense (Acquisition), Dept. of the Army
•   Nominating
•   Risk Oversight
Donna S. Morea652013Chair of the Company's Board; former President of U.S., Europe, and Asia for CGI Group
•   Nominating
•   Risk Oversight
Steven R. Shane622013Former partner at Accenture PLC
•   Audit
•   Compensation (Chair)

(1) Dr. Graham was appointed to the Board of Directors effective as of March 15, 2021.
1 | saic.com

SUMMARY INFORMATION


(1)Ms. Goode was appointed to the Board of Directors effective as of August 27, 2019.
(2)Dr. Hamre became Chair of the Risk Oversight Committee effective as of August 1, 2019.
(3)Ms. Kanouff was appointed to the Board of Directors effective as of August 27, 2019.
(4)Ms. Keene was appointed to the Board of Directors effective as of July 31, 2019, in connection with her appointment as Chief Executive Officer of SAIC.
Corporate Governance Highlights
Board of Directors Independence
✓    Nine of Ten Directors Qualify as Independent Directors
✓    Donna S. Morea is the Independent, Non-Executive Chair of the Board of Directors
✓    Mandatory Retirement Age for Independent Directors is 75 years
✓    Mandatory Retirement Age for Employee Directors is 65 years
✓Nine of Ten Directors Qualify as Independent Directors
Director Elections
✓    Annual Board of Directors Elections
✓    Directors Elected by a Majority of Votes Cast
✓Donna S. Morea is the Independent, Non-Executive Chair of the Board of Directors
✓Mandatory Retirement Age for Independent Directors is 75 years
✓Mandatory Retirement Age for Employee Directors is 65 years
Director Elections
✓Annual Board of Directors Elections
✓Directors Elected by a Majority of Votes Cast
Board of Directors Meetings in Fiscal 20202021
✓    Six Full Board of Directors Meetings
✓    Five Independent Director-Only Sessions
✓Ten Full Board of Directors Meetings
✓Nine Independent Director-Only Sessions
Evaluating and Improving Board of Directors Performance
✓    Annual Board of Directors Self-Evaluation Required
✓    Annual Review of Independence of Board of Directors
✓    Committee Self-Evaluations Required
✓    Board of Directors Orientation/Education Programs
✓Annual Board of Directors Self-Evaluation Required
✓Annual Review of Independence of Board of Directors
✓Committee Self-Evaluations Required
✓Board of Directors Orientation/Education Programs
Aligning Director and Stockholder Interests
✓    Director and Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines
✓    Annual Equity Grant to Non-Employee Directors
✓Director and Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines
✓Annual Equity Grant to Non-Employee Directors
Published Governance Policies and Practices (available at investors.saic.com)
✓Corporate Governance Guidelines
✓Code of Conduct
✓Charters for Committees of Board of Directors
✓
✓    Corporate Governance Guidelines
✓    Code of Conduct
✓    Charters for Committees of Board of Directors
✓    Position Description of Chair of Board Of Directors

Science ApplicationsApplication International Corporation
20202021 Proxy Statement | 2


TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS
INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
5
4
PROPOSAL  1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
910
Majority Voting Standard in Uncontested Director Elections
9
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
9
Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors
910
 

4
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
15
Corporate Governance Guidelines
15
Proxy Access
15
Code of Conduct
15
Director Independence
15
Criteria for Board Membership
16
Board Leadership Structure
17
The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight
17
Sustainability and Social Responsibility
18
Board of Directors Meetings and Committees
18
Board of Directors Compensation
2322
Related Party Transactions
2524
Communication with the Board of Directors
2725
 

PROPOSAL  2 - ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
2826
Vote Required
2826
Recommendation of the Board
2826
PROPOSAL  3 - ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
29
Vote Required
29
Recommendation of the Board
29
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
3027
Human Resources and Compensation Committee Report
4239
 

4
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
4340
Summary Compensation Table

4340
Grants of Plan-Based Awards

4541
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
4742
Options Exercised and Stock Vested
4943
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
5044
Potential Payments upon Termination or a Change in Control
5245
CEO Pay Ratio
5649
PROPOSAL  43 - RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
5750
Vote Required
5750
Recommendation of the Board
5750
AUDIT MATTERS
5851
Audit Committee Report
51
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
51

3 | saic.com

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Audit Committee Report
58
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
58
Audit and Non-Audit Fees
5952
 

4
OTHER INFORMATION
6053
Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
6053
Stock Ownership of Directors and Officers
6054
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
6154
Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations for the 20212022 Annual Meeting
6155
Annual Report on Form 10-K
6255
Appendix to Proxy Statement
6356


Science ApplicationsApplication International Corporation
20202021 Proxy Statement | 4


INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Proxy Statement
This Proxy Statement is being furnished to the stockholders of Science Applications International Corporation ("SAIC"), a Delaware corporation, in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our Board of Directors ("Board") for use at our annual meeting of stockholders to be held on Wednesday, June 3, 2020,2, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. (ET) as a virtual meeting via webcast at http://www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SAIC2020, SAIC2021, and at any and all adjournments, postponements or continuations thereof. This Proxy Statement and the proxy and voting instruction card are first being sent or made available to our stockholders on or about April 22, 2020.21, 2021.

Information About Voting Rights and Solicitation of Proxies
Q:    Who is entitled to vote at the annual meeting?
A:Only stockholders of record of our common stock as of the close of business on our record date of April 7, 2020 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting. As of April 7, 2020, there were 57,922,670 shares of common stock outstanding. We have no other class of capital stock outstanding.
A:    Only stockholders of record of our common stock as of the close of business on our record date of April 6, 2021, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting. As of April 6, 2021, there were 57,967,796 shares of common stock outstanding. We have no other class of capital stock outstanding.
Q:    Who may attend the annual meeting?
A:All stockholders as of our record date of April 7, 2020, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the virtual annual meeting as well as vote and submit questions during the webcast of the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SAIC2020 and entering the 16-digit control number included in our Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or on your proxy card (if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials).
A:    All stockholders as of our record date of April 6, 2021, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the virtual annual meeting as well as vote and submit questions during the webcast of the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com SAIC2021 and entering the 16-digit control number included in our Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or on your proxy card (if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials).
Q:    Why hold a virtual annual meeting?
A:We believe that a virtual stockholder meeting provides greater access to those who may want to attend our annual meeting and, therefore, have chosen this over an in-person meeting. We ensure that at our virtual annual meeting, all attendees are afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting. These procedures include the ability for stockholders to ask questions during the course of the meeting, post appropriate questions received during the meeting for review by other participants, review our corresponding answers to such questions on our Investors Relations website at investors.saic.com as soon as possible after the meeting and access technical support staff during the meeting in the event of difficulties arising from the use of the virtual meeting platform. We continue to receive positive feedback from our stockholders as we adopt best practices and new technologies for our annual meeting, proxy statement and related materials. We evaluate annually the method of holding the annual meeting, taking into consideration the above factors as well as business and market conditions and the proposed agenda items. We continue to believe that holding our annual meeting virtually over the internet is the right approach for our company, as it enables more of our geographically diverse base of stockholders to participate in our annual meeting.
A:    We believe that a virtual stockholder meeting provides greater access to those who may want to attend our annual meeting and, therefore, have chosen this over an in-person meeting. We ensure that at our virtual annual meeting, all attendees are afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting. These procedures include the ability for stockholders to ask questions during the course of the meeting, post appropriate questions received during the meeting for review by other participants, review our corresponding answers to such questions on our Investors Relations website at investors.saic.com as soon as possible after the meeting and access technical support staff during the meeting in the event of difficulties arising from the use of the virtual meeting platform. We continue to receive positive feedback from our stockholders as we adopt best practices and new technologies for our annual meeting, proxy statement and related materials. We evaluate annually the method of holding the annual meeting, taking into consideration the above factors as well as business and market conditions and the proposed agenda items. We continue to believe that holding our annual meeting virtually over the internet is the right approach for our company, as it enables more of our geographically diverse base of stockholders to participate in our annual meeting.
Q:    What constitutes a quorum?
A:The presence, either in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the total voting power of the shares of common stock outstanding as of April 7, 2020, is necessary to constitute a quorum and to conduct business at the annual meeting. Abstentions and broker “non-votes” will be counted as present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum.
A:    The presence, either in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the total voting power of the shares of common stock outstanding as of April 6, 2021, is necessary to constitute a quorum and to conduct business at the annual meeting. Abstentions and broker “non-votes” will be counted as present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum.
Q:    What is a broker “non-vote”?
A:A broker “non-vote” occurs when a broker, bank or other nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that matter and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner. In tabulating the voting results for a particular proposal, broker “non-votes” are not considered entitled to vote on that proposal. Broker “non-votes” will not have an effect on the outcome of any matter being voted on at the meeting, assuming a quorum is present.
A:    A broker “non-vote” occurs when a broker, bank or other nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that matter and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner. In tabulating the voting results for a particular proposal, broker “non-votes” are not considered entitled to vote on that proposal. Broker “non-votes” will not have an effect on the outcome of any matter being voted on at the meeting, assuming a quorum is present.
Unless you provide voting instructions to any broker holding shares on your behalf, your broker may not use discretionary authority to vote your shares on any of the matters to be considered at the annual meeting other than the ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm. Please vote your shares or provide voting instructions to your broker so your vote can be counted.
Q:    How many votes am I entitled to?
A:Each holder of common stock will be entitled to one vote per share, in person or by proxy, for each share of stock held in the stockholder’s name as of April 7, 2020,
A:    Each holder of common stock will be entitled to one vote per share, in person or by proxy, for each share of stock held in the stockholder’s name as of April 6, 2021, on any matter submitted to a vote of stockholders at the annual meeting.


5 | saic.com

INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Q:    How do I vote my shares?
A:Shares of common stock represented by a properly executed and timely proxy will, unless it has previously been revoked, be voted in accordance with its instructions. In the absence of specific instructions, the shares represented by a properly executed and timely proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board’s recommendations as follows:
A:    Shares of common stock represented by a properly executed and timely proxy will, unless it has previously been revoked, be voted in accordance with its instructions. In the absence of specific instructions, the shares represented by a properly executed and timely proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board’s recommendations as follows:
•    FOR all of the company’s nominees to the Board;
•    FOR the approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers ("Say-on-Pay");
FOR the approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of an annual Say-on-Pay vote; and
•    FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending January 29, 2021.28, 2022.
No other business is expected to come before the annual meeting; however, should any other matter properly come before the annual meeting, the proxy holders intend to vote such shares in accordance with their best judgment on any additional matter.


There are four different ways to vote your shares:
 interneta161a.jpg


telephonea111a.jpg
By InternetBy Telephone
You may submit a proxy or voting instructions over the Internet by going to www.proxyvote.com or by scanning the QR code on your proxy and voting instruction card with a smart phone and following the instructions.
 
You may submit a proxy or voting instructions by calling 1-800-690-6903 and following the instructions.
mla271a.jpg
virtuala071a.jpg
By MailAt The Virtual Annual Meeting
If you received your proxy materials in the mail, you may complete, sign and return the accompanying proxy and voting instruction card in the postage-paid envelope provided.If you are a stockholder of record you may electronically attend the virtual annual meeting and vote your shares at http://www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SAIC2020SAIC2021 during the meeting. You will need to provide your 16-digit control number that is on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or your proxy card if you receive a printed copy of the proxy materials by mail.
Submitting a proxy will not prevent you from attending the annual meeting and voting virtually. Any proxy may be revoked at any time prior to exercise by delivering a written revocation or a new proxy bearing a later date to our mailing agent, Broadridge, as described below or by attending the virtual annual meeting and voting in person. The mailing address of our mailing agent is Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717. Attendance at the virtual annual meeting will not, however, in and of itself, revoke a proxy.
Q:    What are the voting deadlines?
A:For shares not held in the Science Applications International Corporation Retirement Plan (the “SAIC Retirement Plan”), the deadline for submitting a proxy using the Internet or the telephone is 11:59 p.m. (ET) on June 2, 2020. For shares held in the SAIC Retirement Plan, the deadline for submitting voting instructions using any of the allowed methods is 11:59 p.m. (ET) on May 29, 2020.


A:    For shares not held in the Science Applications International Corporation Retirement Plan (the “SAIC Retirement Plan”), the deadline for submitting a proxy using the Internet or the telephone is 11:59 p.m. (ET) on June 1, 2021. For shares held in the SAIC Retirement Plan, the deadline for submitting voting instructions using any of the allowed methods is 11:59 p.m. (ET) on May 27, 2021.
Science ApplicationsApplication International Corporation
20202021 Proxy Statement | 6

INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Q:    How are the shares held by the SAIC Retirement Plan voted?
A:Each participant in the SAIC Retirement Plan has the right to instruct Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company ("Vanguard"), as trustee of the SAIC Retirement Plan (the “SAIC Trustee”), on a confidential basis, how to vote his or her proportionate interests in all shares of common stock held in the SAIC Retirement Plan. The SAIC Trustee will vote all shares held in the SAIC Retirement Plan for which no voting instructions are received in the same proportion as the shares for which voting instructions have been received by participants in the SAIC Retirement Plan. The SAIC Trustee’s duties with respect to voting the shares of common stock in the SAIC Retirement Plan are governed by the fiduciary provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”). The fiduciary provisions of ERISA may require in certain limited circumstances that the SAIC Trustee override the votes of participants with respect to the shares of common stock held by the SAIC Trustee.
A:    Each participant in the SAIC Retirement Plan has the right to instruct Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company ("Vanguard"), as trustee of the SAIC Retirement Plan (the “SAIC Trustee”), on a confidential basis, how to vote his or her proportionate interests in all shares of common stock held in the SAIC Retirement Plan. The SAIC Trustee will vote all shares held in the SAIC Retirement Plan for which no voting instructions are received in the same proportion as the shares for which voting instructions have been received by participants in the SAIC Retirement Plan. The SAIC Trustee’s duties with respect to voting the shares of common stock in the SAIC Retirement Plan are governed by the fiduciary provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”). The fiduciary provisions of ERISA may require in certain limited circumstances that the SAIC Trustee override the votes of participants with respect to the shares of common stock held by the SAIC Trustee.
Q:    How are the shares held by the SAIC Stock Plans voted?
A:Under the terms of our Management Stock Compensation Plan and Key Executive Stock Deferral Plan (collectively, the "SAIC Stock Plans"), Vanguard, as trustee of the SAIC Stock Plans, has the power to vote the shares of common stock held in the SAIC Stock Plans. Vanguard will vote all those shares in the same proportion that our other stockholders collectively vote their shares of common stock. If you are a participant in any of the SAIC Stock Plans, you do not have the right to instruct Vanguard how to vote or to otherwise vote your proportionate interests in the shares of common stock held in such SAIC Stock Plan.
A:    Under the terms of our Management Stock Compensation Plan and Key Executive Stock Deferral Plan (collectively, the "SAIC Stock Plans"), Vanguard, as trustee of the SAIC Stock Plans, has the power to vote the shares of common stock held in the SAIC Stock Plans. Vanguard will vote all those shares in the same proportion that our other stockholders collectively vote their shares of common stock. If you are a participant in any of the SAIC Stock Plans, you do not have the right to instruct Vanguard how to vote or to otherwise vote your proportionate interests in the shares of common stock held in such SAIC Stock Plan.
Q:    What is the difference between a “stockholder of record” and a “beneficial” holder?
A:These terms describe how the ownership of your shares is reflected on the books of our transfer agent, Computershare. If your shares are registered directly with Computershare, then you are a “stockholder of record” of these shares. If your shares are held in an account at a broker, bank, trust or other similar organization, then you are a “beneficial” holder of these shares. The organization holding your account is considered the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the annual meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to instruct the organization on how to vote the shares held in your account. If you wish to vote in person at the virtual annual meeting, you must obtain a valid proxy from the organization holding the shares.
A:    These terms describe how the ownership of your shares is reflected on the books of our transfer agent, Computershare. If your shares are registered directly with Computershare, then you are a “stockholder of record” of these shares. If your shares are held in an account at a broker, bank, trust or other similar organization, then you are a “beneficial” holder of these shares. The organization holding your account is considered the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the annual meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to instruct the organization on how to vote the shares held in your account. If you wish to vote in person at the virtual annual meeting, you must obtain a valid proxy from the organization holding the shares.
Q:    Who is soliciting these proxies?
A:We are soliciting these proxies and the cost of the solicitation will be borne by us, including the charges and expenses of persons holding shares in their name as nominee incurred in connection with forwarding proxy materials to the beneficial owners of those shares. In addition to the distribution of the proxy materials by mail and through the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials described below under the caption "Internet Availability of Proxy Materials," proxies may be solicited by our officers, directors and employees in person, by telephone or by email. These individuals will not be additionally compensated for such solicitation but may be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with such solicitation.
A:    We are soliciting these proxies and the cost of the solicitation will be borne by us, including the charges and expenses of persons holding shares in their name as nominee incurred in connection with forwarding proxy materials to the beneficial owners of those shares. In addition to the distribution of the proxy materials by mail and through the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials described below under the caption "Internet Availability of Proxy Materials," proxies may be solicited by our officers, directors and employees in person, by telephone or by email. These individuals will not be additionally compensated for such solicitation but may be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with such solicitation.
Q:    What is “householding” and how does it affect me?
A:We have adopted a procedure approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) called “householding.” Under this procedure, we send only one proxy statement and one annual report to eligible stockholders who share a single address, unless we have received instructions to the contrary from any stockholder at that address. This practice is designed to reduce our printing and postage costs. Stockholders who do not participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy and voting instruction cards. We do not use householding for any other stockholder mailings. 
A:    We have adopted a procedure approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) called “householding.” Under this procedure, we send only one proxy statement and one annual report to eligible stockholders who share a single address, unless we have received instructions to the contrary from any stockholder at that address. This practice is designed to reduce our printing and postage costs. Stockholders who do not participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy and voting instruction cards. We do not use householding for any other stockholder mailings. 
If you are a registered stockholder residing at an address with other registered stockholders and wish to receive a separate copy of the proxy statement or annual report, or if you do not wish to participate in householding and prefer to receive separate copies of these documents in the future, please contact our mailing agent, Broadridge, either by calling toll-free at (800) 542-1061, or by writing to Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717. If you own shares through a bank, broker or other nominee, you should contact the nominee concerning householding procedures. We will promptly deliver a separate copy of the proxy statement or annual report to you upon request.
If you are eligible for householding, but you and other stockholders of record with whom you share an address currently receive multiple copies of the proxy statement or annual report and you wish to receive a single copy of each of these documents for your household, please contact our mailing agent, Broadridge, at the telephone number or address indicated above to bring this to our mailing agent’s attention.
Q:    Where can I find the voting results of the annual meeting?
A:
A:    We intend to announce preliminary voting results at the annual meeting and publish final results in a Current Report on Form 8-K to be filed with the SEC within four business days of the annual meeting.

7 | saic.com

INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS


Internet Availability of Proxy Materials
As permitted by the rules and regulations of the SEC, we are using the Internet as a means of furnishing proxy materials to our stockholders. We believe this method makes the proxy distribution process more efficient, lowers costs and helps in conserving natural resources.
On or about April 22, 2020,21, 2021, we mailed to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials, including the proxy statement and annual report. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials also instructs you on how to access your proxy and voting instruction card to be able to vote through the Internet or by telephone. Other stockholders, in accordance with their prior requests, and employees with regular access to email through their company email address have received email notification of how to access our proxy materials and vote via the Internet or by telephone or have been mailed paper copies of our proxy materials and a proxy and voting instruction card.
The proxy statement and annual report are available at www.proxyvote.com.


Science ApplicationsApplication International Corporation
20202021 Proxy Statement | 8


PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
 
At the annual meeting, ten directors are to be elected to serve for one-year terms to hold that position until each director’s successor is elected and qualified unless any of the directors resign or are removed prior to the end of their respective term. All nominees have been nominated by the Board based on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee thereof. To the best knowledge of the Board, all of the nominees are able and willing to serve. Each nominee has consented to be named in this Proxy Statement and to serve if elected. Each nominee listed below is currently a director of the company and, other than Carol A. Goode, Yvette M. Kanouff and Nazzic S. Keene,Dr. Graham, each was elected by the stockholders at our 20192020 annual meeting of stockholders. Ms. Goode and Ms. Kanouff wereDr. Graham was elected to serve as directorsa director by the Board effective as of August 27, 2019, and are standing for election by our stockholders as directors of the company for the first time at this year’s annual meeting. Mses. Goode and Kanouff were each first identified as a potential director candidate by a third-party recruiting firm engaged by the company. Each was then evaluated by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in advance of its recommendation of their service as a director.
Anthony J. Moraco, the company's former Chief Executive Officer and a former member of the Board, retired from SAIC effective as of July 31, 2019. Ms. Keene was appointed as a member of the Board effective as of July 31, 2019, in connection with her appointment as Chief Executive Officer of SAICMarch 15, 2021, and is standing for election by our stockholders as a director of the company for the first time at this year'syear’s annual meeting. Dr. Graham was first identified as a potential director candidate by a third-party recruiting firm engaged by the company. Dr. Graham was then evaluated by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in advance of its recommendation of his service as a director.

Majority Voting Standard in Uncontested Director Elections
We have adopted majority voting procedures for the election of directors in uncontested elections. In an uncontested election, nominees must receive more “for” than “against” votes to be elected without further action. Abstentions are not counted as votes cast. As provided in our bylaws, a “contested election” is one in which the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected. The election of directors at the 20202021 annual meeting of stockholders is an uncontested election.
If an incumbent director receives more “against” than “for” votes, he or she is expected to tender his or her resignation in accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider the offer of resignation and recommend to the Board the action to be taken. The Board will promptly disclose its decision as to whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation in a press release, Current Report on Form 8-K or other public announcement.
Shares of common stock represented by properly executed, timely received and unrevoked proxies will be voted as instructed in the proxy. In the absence of specific instructions, the shares represented by properly executed, timely received and unrevoked proxies will be voted “for” each nominee. If any of the nominees listed below becomes unable to stand for election at the annual meeting, the proxy holders intend to vote for any person designated by the Board to replace the nominee unable to serve.

Recommendation of the Board of Directors
The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR each nominee.

9 | saic.com

PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors
Set forth below is a brief biography of each nominee for election as a director and a brief discussion of the specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the Board’s conclusion that the nominee should serve as a director of our company. The Board evaluates each individual in the context of the Board as a whole, with the objective of recommending to stockholders a group of nominees with complementary skills and a diverse mix of backgrounds, perspectives and expertise beneficial to the broad business diversity of the company. Our board membership criteria and director nomination process are described in the “Corporate Governance” section of this Proxy Statement.


9    | saic.com

PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Robert A. Bedingfield
bobbedingfieldbwa011a.jpg
Age: 7172
 
Director since: 2013
 
Independent
Select Qualifications and Skills:
Leadership and Executive Management Experience: Served as Global Coordinating Partner at Ernst & Young LLP ("EY"), a multinational professional services firm.
Financial Expertise: Over 40 years of experience, including 32 years as a partner in EY's accounting and auditing practices.
Industry Knowledge and Experience: Government Contracting: Served as Senior Advisory Partner for a number of EY’s largest clients and served on EY’s Senior Governing Board; Aerospace and Defense Industry: Served as EY’s Aerospace & Defense Practice Leader for over 15 years.
Director Experience: Mr. Bedingfield has served on the Board of Emeritus Trustees for the University of Maryland at College Park Foundation since 2000 and is currently an Emeritus Trustee, and the Board of Directors for GeoPark Limited since 2015, where he is also the Chair of the Audit Committee.and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees.
The Board believes that Mr. Bedingfield’s financial expertise and his deep knowledge and experience in government contracting gained through decades of serving major companies in our industry provide important contributions to the Board.
Committees: Audit (Chair); Compensation




Carol A. Goode
carolgoodebwa011a.jpg
Age: 6667
 
Director since: 2019
 
Independent
Select Qualifications and Skills:
Leadership Experience: Currently serves as a human capital consultant for various technology firms. From 2014 until 2018, she served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of Brocade Communications, a technology company specializing in data and storage networking products, where she strategically led global, cross-functional teams through multiple acquisitions and divestitures. Ms. Goode also served as Vice President of Human Resources for the Product Development Group at Nortel Networks, a former multinational telecommunications and data networking equipment manufacturer, from 1997 until 2001.
Director Experience: In 2019, Ms. Goode served on the Board of Directors for WageWorks, an employee benefits administration company. Since 2020, Ms. Goode has served on the Board of Directors for Carney Technology Acquisition Corporation II, a special purpose acquisition company.
Ms. Goode brings more than 35 years of distinguished business experience in the fields of human resources and human capital management. The Board believes that her expertise provides significant value to our Board and the company in talent management, acquisition and retention.

Committees: Compensation; Nominating



Science Applications International Corporation
20202021 Proxy Statement | 10

PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Dr. Garth N. Graham
a21-0869xbodxgarthgraham1a.jpg
Age: 46
Director since: 2021
Independent
Select Qualifications and Skills:
Leadership and Executive Management Experience: Since January 2021, Dr. Graham has served as the Director and Global Head of Healthcare for YouTube, LLC, an online video-sharing platform and subsidiary of Alphabet Inc. (Nasdaq: GOOGL). From 2019 until 2021, Dr. Graham served as the Chief Community Health Officer for CVS Health Corporation (NYSE: CVS), a diversified health services company, and from 2013 until 2019, he served in various roles for Aetna Inc., a health insurance company, including as the President of the Aetna Foundation and the Vice President for Community Health.
Healthcare and Industry Expertise: Dr. Graham holds a medical degree from Yale School of Medicine, and a Master of Public Health from Yale School of Public Health. A cardiologist and professor of medicine, he was Deputy Assistant Secretary to the U.S. Health and Human Services Department under Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush, in addition he led the Office of Minority Health and the federal government’s first National Health Disparities Plan. An elected member of the National Academy of Medicine, he contributes to several boards including the Institute of Medicine Board on Population Health, the National Quality Forum, and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Advisory Council.
The Board believes that Dr. Graham’s extensive healthcare expertise and leadership qualifications in various senior roles within the healthcare arena provides a unique and dynamic skill set to the Board.
Committees: Compensation




Dr. John J. Hamre
johnhamrebwa011a.jpg
Age: 6970
 
Director since: 2013
 
Independent
Select Qualifications and Skills:
Leadership and Executive Management Experience: Serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Center for Strategic & International Studies since 2000. Served as Chairman of the Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee for four Secretaries of Defense for 10 years.
Industry Knowledge and Experience: Served as U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense from 1997 to 2000 and Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) from 1993 to 1997.
Director Experience: Dr. Hamre was previously a directorDirector of Exelis, Inc., a former global aerospace, defense, information and services company, until May 2015 and a directorDirector of Leidos Holdings, Inc., our former parent, until September 2016. Since 2018, Dr. Hamre has served as a directorDirector for ImperativeCare, a neurovascular device company. Dr. Hamre also served on the Board of Directors of the MITRE Corporation, a non-profit organization, from 2001 to October 2018, as well as Chairman of the Board of Directors from May 2016 to October 2018.
Dr. Hamre is a leading expert on issues of national security, defense and international affairs with extensive experience working in these areas from serving in high-ranking positions at the U.S. Department of Defense. His particular expertise in matters key to our business, as well as his executive management experience as Chief Executive Officer of a leading public policy research institution, offer important contributions to the Board.
Committees: Nominating; Risk Oversight (Chair)
 





Yvette M. Kanouff

11 | saic.com

PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Yvette M. Kanouff
yvettekanouffbw1a.jpg
Age: 5455
 
Director since: 2019
 
Independent

Select Qualifications and Skills:
Leadership Experience: Currently serves as a Partner and Chief Technology Officer for JC2 Ventures, a Silicon Valley based venture capital firm. Prior to her current role, Ms. Kanouff served from 2014 to 2019 as the Senior Vice President and General Manager for the service provider business line of Cisco Systems, Inc., a global leader in information technology, networking and cybersecurity solutions. Prior to her role with Cisco, from 2012 to 2014, Ms. Kanouff served as Executive Vice President of Engineering and Technology for Cablevision Systems Corporation, a cable television provider and multiple system operator, and from 2010 to 2012, served as President of SeaChange International, a video management solutions provider. 
Director Experience: Ms. Kanouff has served on the Board of Directors for Sprinklr, a software management and enterprise social media marketing firm, since 2018, and she servesSafe Security, a cyber risk quantification company, since 2020. She also has served on the Board of Directors for Amdocs, a software and services provider to communications and media companies, since 2020.
The Board believes that Ms. Kanouff’s diverse background in the technology industry, with over 25 years of extensive leadership positions and experience, combined with a solid strategy and investment background, provide great insight and value to our Board.
Committees: Audit; Risk Oversight




11    | saic.com

PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Nazzic S. Keene
nazzickeenebwa011a.jpg
Age: 5960
 
Director since: 2019
 
Chief Executive Officer

Select Qualifications and Skills:
Leadership and Executive Management Experience:Serves as our Chief Executive Officer and a Director since 2019. Previously served as Chief Operating Officer from 2017 until July 2019, where she was responsible for overseeing daily operations of the company, including its long-term strategy for sustained profitable growth. Ms. Keene joined the company in 2012, holding several leadership roles including President of the Company’s Global Markets & Mission sector and Senior Vice President of Corporate Strategy.
Director Experience: Since 2020, Ms. Keene has served as a member of the Board of Directors for each of Automatic Data Processing, Inc., a provider of human resources management software and services, INOVA Hospital System, a non-profit health organization, and VA Ready Initiative, a non-profit organization focused on economic development initiatives in response to COVID-19.
Industry Knowledge and Experience: Over 35 years of experience in the information systems and technology services industry, with 25 years in executive management positions. Prior to joining SAIC, Ms. Keene was the Senior Vice President and General Manager for U.S. Enterprise Markets at CGI Group Inc., a global information technology consulting, systems integration, outsourcing and solutions company listed on the New York Stock Exchange, from 2004 to 2012, leading the company’s U.S. expansion in all aspects of strategy development, operational execution and leadership development. She previously held various roles in the communications and IT industry.
The Board believes that Ms. Keene’s extensive market knowledge, leadership skills and management ability proven throughout her leadership roles and as an executive officer with our company make her highly qualified to serve on our Board. In addition, our Board believes that the company’s Chief Executive Officer should serve on the Board of Directors to help communicate the Board’s priorities to management as well as bring management’s perspective on matters considered by the Board.

Committee: Risk Oversight





David M. Kerko
davidkerkobwa01.jpg
Age: 47
Director since: 2019
Independent

Select Qualifications and Skills:
Leadership Experience: Served as an Executive of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. ("KKR"), a global investment firm, from 2010 to 2015, and as an advisor of KKR from March 2015 to present.
Financial Expertise: In 1998, Mr. Kerko joined KKR and is a former Member and Co-head of the Technology industry team within KKR’s Private Equity platform. He was actively involved in KKR’s investments in Borden, Toys ‘R’ Us, The Analytic Sciences Corporation ("TASC"), NXP (formerly Philips Semiconductor), Savant and Sonos.
Director Experience: Mr. Kerko currently serves on the Board of Directors of Global Foundries, Inc., a semiconductor company, Transphorm Inc., a semiconductor company, TE Connectivity Ltd., a technology company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products, and Nebula Acquisition Corporation, a special purpose acquisition company. Previously, he was a Director of TASC, an engineering services company, from 2009 until 2015, and for Engility from 2015 to 2019.
Mr. Kerko possesses decades of significant experience advising emerging and established companies with respect to strategic planning, corporate finance and public markets strategy, particularly in the technology industry. The Board believes that his critical strategy and financial insight will be greatly beneficial to our company and the Board.
Committees: Audit; Compensation






Science Applications International Corporation
20202021 Proxy Statement | 12

PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Timothy J. Mayopoulos
timmayopoulosbwa011a.jpg
Age: 6162
 
Director since: 2015
 
Independent
Select Qualifications and Skills:
Leadership Experience: President of Blend Labs, Inc., a Silicon Valley enterprise software company. Previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Federal National Mortgage Association, known as Fannie Mae, from June 2012 until October 2018. 
Executive Management and Legal Expertise: In addition to his recent executive leadership roles as President of Blend Labs and President and CEO of Fannie Mae, Mr. Mayopoulos was Chief Administrative Officer of Fannie Mae from 2010 to 2012, and General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Fannie Mae from 2009 to 2012. Prior to joining Fannie Mae, he was Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Bank of America Corporation. 
Financial Expertise: Mr. Mayopoulos has held executive leadership roles in financial institutions that have required significant financial expertise and capital markets knowledge. He also serves on the Audit Committee and Chairs the Nominating and Corporate GovernanceOperational Risk Committee of the Board of Directors of Lending Club Corporation, the largest onlinea sole-spectrum fintech marketplace connecting borrowers and investors.bank.
Director Expertise: In addition to Mr. Mayopoulos' service as a member of the Board of Directors for Lending Club Corporation, he also serves on the Board of Directors for Blend Labs, Inc., a digital lending platform for mortgages and consumer banking.banking, and the Board of Directors for Valon Technologies, Inc., a digital mortgage services company.
Mr. Mayopoulos has over 30 years of professional experience. His valuable contributions to our Board include his executive management experience, his experience in finance and capital markets, his legal background and his experience operating in highly regulated businesses.
Committees: Audit; Nominating (Chair)
 




Katharina G. McFarland
katharinamcfarlandbwa011a.jpg
Age: 6061
 
Director since: 2019
 
Independent
 
Select Qualifications and Skills:
Leadership Experience: ServedWith over 30 years of government service, Katharina (Katrina) McFarland is widely recognized as a leading subject-matter expert on government procurement. She serves as Chair of the Board of Army Research and Development at the National Academies of Science, Commissioner of the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence, and as a Director on the Procurement Round Table. She was previously the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Acquisition (Presidential Appointee),(2012 to 2017) and Actingacting Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisitions,(Acquisition, Logistics & Technology and Army Acquisition Executive from 2012Technology) (2016 to 2017. Served as2017). She was President of the Defense Acquisition University from 2010 to 2012. From 2006 to 2010, Ms. McFarland was the Director of Acquisition, Missile Defense Agency. Ms. McFarland began her civil service career in 1986 at Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps, as a general engineer.
Director Experience: Ms. McFarland serves as an advisor or a Director to several boards,Boards of Directors, including American Defense International,Raytheon Missile Systems Division Senior Advisory Board, Cypress International the Institute for Defense Analysis,Senior Strategy Group, Transunion Corporation Advisory Board, Exyn Technologies Board of Directors, and Sehlke, Inc. She is also the Chair of the National Academies of Sciences Board on Army R&D, and the Commissioner of the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence.Inc, Senior Advisory Board. Ms. McFarland was a Director for Engility from 2017 to January 2019.
Ms. McFarland brings substantial experience in defense acquisition, program management, logistics and technology, intechnology. In particular, her experience with the U.S. Department of Defense, and the Department of Army, and IT and the Intelligence sector, whichCommunity procurement provides valuable insight to the Board.
Committees: Nominating; Risk Oversight
 



13 | saic.com

PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Donna S. Morea
donnamoreabwa011a.jpg
Age: 6566
 
Director since: 2013
 
Independent
Chair of the Board

Select Qualifications and Skills:
Leadership and Executive Management Experience: Served as President of CGI Technology and Solutions, Inc. ("CGI"), a wholly-owned U.S. subsidiary of CGI Group, one of the largest independent information technology firms in North America, from May 2004 until her retirement at the end of 2011. Ms. Morea also served as a Director for CGI from February 2012 to May 2013. Ms. Morea currently serves as an Operating Advisor at The Carlyle Group, a private equity firm, serving as a directorDirector for several technology portfolio companies.
Industry Knowledge and Experience: Information and Technology Expertise: Over 30 years of experience; nationally recognized executive in IT professional services management; and led CGI’s IT and business process services in the U.S. and India for large enterprises in financial services, healthcare, telecommunications and government.
Director Experience: Ms. Morea served as a member of the Board of Directors of SunTrust Banks, Inc. from 2012 until December 2019, and has served as a member of the Board of Directors of Inova Health System since 2015, and Truist Financial CorpCorp. since December 2019.
The Board believes that Ms. Morea’s executive management experience and information technology expertise provide valuable leadership experience and market knowledge of a significant segment of our business.
Committees: Nominating; Risk Oversight

 



Steven R. Shane
steveshanebwa011a.jpg
Age: 6263
 
Director since: 2013
 
Independent
Select Qualifications and Skills:
Leadership: Served as a partner of Accenture plc ("Accenture"), a management consulting, technology and outsourcing services firm, until his retirement in 2011 after a 30-year career.
Financial Expertise and Industry Experience: Consulting and Technology Systems: While at Accenture, Mr. Shane was the Managing Partner of the North America Public Service business responsible for Accenture’s U.S. federal, state and local and Canadian federal and provincial business. He also held several other senior management positions, including those where he led consulting engagements for many of the largest banking institutions in the United States. Following his retirement from Accenture in 2011, Mr. Shane joined LH&P, LLC ("LH&P"), a boutique consulting company, where he provided strategic, organizational and business advice to senior executives in some of the largest U.S. financial services companies. Mr. Shane retired from LH&P in March 2018. In March 2020, Mr. Shane rejoined LH&P as an independent consultant.
Director Experience: Mr. Shane haspreviously served on the boardBoard of directorsDirectors for ZPower, LLC, a battery technology company, sincefrom 2003 anduntil his voluntary retirement in 2019. Mr. Shane has served on the Board of Directors for MAXIMUS Federal Services, an outsourcing company that provides business process services to government health and human services agencies, since 2013. In addition, heHe also served as a directorDirector for Dispersive Networks, LLC, a virtual network solutions provider, from 2014 until his voluntary retirement from the board in January 2020.
The Board believes that Mr. Shane’s expertise in financial matters and the implementation of significant, mission-critical technology systems for the U.S. government as well as state and local governments offer perspectives that our Board considers valuable to us as a leading provider of technical, engineering and enterprise information technology services to government customers.

Committees: Audit; Compensation (Chair)
 

Science Applications International Corporation
20202021 Proxy Statement | 14


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Guidelines
Our Board recognizes the importance of strong corporate governance as a means of addressing the various needs of our stockholders, employees, customers and other stakeholders. As a result, our Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines which, together with our certificate of incorporation, bylaws, committee charters and other key governance practices and policies, provide the framework for our corporate governance. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines cover a wide range of subjects, including criteria for determining the independence and qualification of our directors. These guidelines are available on our Investor Relations website at investors.saic.com by clicking on the link entitled “Corporate Governance.” The Board recognizes that observing good corporate governance practices is an ongoing responsibility. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee regularly reviews corporate governance developments and recommends revisions to these Corporate Governance Guidelines and other corporate governance documents as necessary to promote our and our stockholders’ best interests and to help ensure that we comply with all applicable laws, regulations and stock exchange requirements relating to corporate governance. 

Proxy Access
Our bylaws include a “proxy access” provision for director nominations under which eligible stockholders may nominate candidates for election to our Board and inclusion in our proxy statement for our annual meeting of stockholders. The “proxy access” provision provides that:
•an eligible stockholder, or an eligible group of up to 20 stockholders, representing at least 3% of our outstanding shares of common stock,
•owning those shares continuously for at least three years,
•can nominate and include in our proxy statement director nominees constituting up to 25% of the Board or, if that percentage is not a whole number, the closest whole number below 25%, but not less than two individuals, for election at our annual meeting of stockholders.
These “proxy access” director nominees are subject to certain eligibility, procedural and disclosure requirements as further set forth in Section 3.17 of our bylaws. 

Code of Conduct
All of our employees, including our executive officers and our directors, are required to comply with our Code of Conduct, which describes our standards for protecting company and customer assets, fostering a safe and healthy work environment, dealing fairly with customers and others, conducting international business properly, reporting misconduct and protecting employees from retaliation. Our Code of Conduct forms the foundation of our corporate policies and procedures designed to promote ethical behavior in all aspects of our business.
Our Code of Conduct is available on our Investors Relations website at investors.saic.com by clicking on the link entitled “Corporate Governance.”

Director Independence
The Board annually determines the independence of each of our directors and nominees in accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines. These guidelines provide that “independent” directors are those who are independent of management and free from any relationship that, in the judgment of the Board, would interfere with their exercise of independent judgment. No director qualifies as independent unless the Board affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with us (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization with which we have a relationship). The Board has established independence standards set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines that include all elements of independence required by the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).
All members of the Audit, Human Resources and Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees must be independent directors as defined under our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Members of the Audit Committee must also

15 | saic.com

 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

satisfy a separate independence requirement pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act”), which requires that they not accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from us or any of our subsidiaries other than their directors’ compensation or be an affiliated person of us or any of our subsidiaries.
Each year, our directors complete a questionnaire which requires them to disclose any transactions with us in which the director or any member of his or her immediate family might have a direct or potential conflict of interest. Based on an analysis of the responses, the Board determined that all directors, except for Mr. Moraco, because of his role as our former Chief Executive Officer, and Ms. Keene, because of her role as our current Chief Executive Officer, are independent under its guidelinesour Corporate Governance Guidelines and free from any relationship that would interfere with the exercise of their independent judgment. The Board also determined that David M. Kerko, a former director, was independent prior to his resignation from the Board effective as of February 12, 2021. The Board considered the following relationshipsrelationship involving Mr. Bedingfield and Dr. Hamre in reaching the conclusion that those relationships did not interfere with the exercise of each of their independent judgment:
Mr. Bedingfield’s son, Kenneth Bedingfield, served as the Chief Financial Officer of Northrop Grumman Corporation from February 2015 to February 2020; and
•    Dr. Hamre is Chairman of the Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee, a committee that advises the Secretary of Defense on foreign policy matters and has no role in acquisition issues. 

Criteria for Board Membership
To fulfill its responsibility to identify and recommend to the full Board nominees for election as directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the composition of the Board to determine the qualifications and areas of expertise needed to further enhance the composition of the Board. In evaluating potential nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board consider each individual in the context of the Board as a whole, with the objective of recommending to stockholders a slate of individual director nominees that can best continue the success of our business and advance stockholders’ interests. In evaluating the suitability of individual nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board consider many factors, including:
✓    expertise and involvement in areas relevant to our business such as defense, intelligence, science, finance, government or commercial and international business;
✓    interpersonal skills, substantial personal accomplishments and diversity as to gender, age, race, ethnic background and experience;
✓    commitment to business ethics, professional reputation, independence and understanding of the responsibilities of a director and the governance processes of a public company;
✓    demonstrated leadership, with the ability to exercise sound judgment informed by diversity of experience and perspectives; and
✓    benefits from the continuing service of qualified incumbent directors in promoting stability and continuity, contributing to the Board’s ability to work together as a collective body and giving the company the benefit of experience and insight that its directors have accumulated during their tenure.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the director selection process annually and the Committee and the Board collectively assess its effectiveness through an annual written evaluation process. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has been directed by the Board to observe the following principles contained in our Corporate Governance Guidelines:
✓    a majority of directors must meet the independence criteria established by the Board;
✓    based upon the range of 7 to 14 directors currently specified in our bylaws, no more than three directors may be an employee of SAIC;
✓    only a full-time employee who serves as either the Chief Executive Officer or one of his or her direct reports will be considered as a candidate for an employee director position; and
✓    no director nominee may be a consultant to the company.
The Board expects a high level of commitment from its members and will review a candidate’s other commitments and service on other boards to ensure that the candidate has sufficient time to devote to the company. In addition, non-employee directors may not serve on the board of directors of more than four other publicly-traded companies. Moreover, directors are expected to act ethically at all times and adhere to our Code of Conduct.


Science Applications International Corporation
20202021 Proxy Statement | 16


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board Leadership Structure
The Board is currently led by a non-executive Chair, Ms. Morea, who is an independent director. Our Board believes that it is in the best interests of stockholders for the Board to have the flexibility to determine the most qualified and appropriate individual to serve as Chair of the Board, whether that person is an independent director or the Chief Executive Officer. The Board selects the Chair annually and may decide to separate or combine the roles of Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, if appropriate, at any time in the future. In cases where the Board determines it is in the best interests of our stockholders to combine the positions of Chair and Chief Executive Officer, the independent directors will upon nomination and recommendation by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, elect a lead independent director with the responsibilities described in our Corporate Governance Guidelines.
The functions of the non-executive Chair of the Board include:
•    planning the Board’s annual schedule of meetings and agendas, in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer and Corporate Secretary and other directors as appropriate;
•    coordinating with the Chief Executive Officer and the Corporate Secretary to ensure that the Board receives the appropriate quantity and quality of information in a timely manner to enable it to make informed decisions;
•    chairing all meetings of the Board and of the independent directors in executive session and ensure that meetings are conducted efficiently and effectively;
•    facilitating full and candid Board discussions, ensuring all directors express their views on key Board matters and assist the Board in achieving a consensus;
•    working with committee chairs to ensure that each committee functions effectively and keeps the Board apprised of actions taken;
•    building consensus, developing teamwork and a cohesive Board culture and facilitating formal and informal communication with and among directors; and
•    serving as the liaison between the Board and company management.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight
As part of its oversight function, the Board and its committees monitor risk as part of their regular deliberations throughout the year. When granting authority to management, approving strategies, making decisions and receiving management reports, the Board considers, among other things, the risks facing the company. The Board also oversees risk in particular areas through its committee structure.
The Board has the following principal standing committees: Audit, Risk Oversight, Human Resources and Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance. The charters of these committees are available in print to any stockholder who requests them and are also available on our Investor Relations website at investors.saic.com by clicking on the link entitled “Corporate Governance.” Note that the Board's former Classified Business Oversight Committee and Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Committee were merged to create the Risk Oversight Committee effective as of August 1, 2019.

17    | saic.com

 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board of Directors
 









 
Audit CommitteeRisk Oversight Committee
Human Resources
and Compensation
Committee
Nominating and
Corporate Governance
Committee
The Audit Committee evaluates the company’s guidelines and policies regarding risk assessment and risk management, including risks related to internal control over financial reporting, the company’s major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control those exposures.The Risk Oversight Committee reviews and provides oversight of the company's regulatory, enterprise and strategic risk; ethics, compliance, and corporate responsibilities; and its classified and business operations.
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee assesses risks potentially arising from the company’s human resources and compensation policies and practices.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies and recommends individuals for selection to the Board, develops and recommends corporate governance guidelines to the Board, makes recommendations regarding the size, composition and charters of the Board and oversees the evaluation of the Board and Board committees.

17 | saic.com

 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The company also utilizes an internal Enterprise Risk Management Committee comprised of the senior management that, among other things, works with the Chief Executive Officer, the committees of the Board and the full Board to establish the overall corporate risk strategy and oversight of policies, systems, processes and training relating to risk matters within the company. This committee reports quarterly to the Audit Committee and annually to the full Board on its activities and findings, highlighting the key risks we face and management’s actions for managing those risks.


Sustainability and Social Responsibility
Sustainability and corporate social responsibility are integral parts of what we do at SAIC and embedded in our culture, vision and mission. Dedication to ethics and integrity is at the core of every level of our business, from Board oversight and executive leadership to individual team members and business partners. SAIC embraces industry best practices around our talent recruitment and retention activities, as well as the career development opportunities we present to employees. As a result, our employees’ interests, diversity, ingenuity, vibrancy and tradition of service to SAIC’s customers and communities have been publicly recognized through multiple government and industry awards.
With a strong emphasis on community engagement and charitable giving, we strive to be an industry-leading corporate citizen. In June 2020, SAIC’s executive leadership, with the support of the Board, established the SAIC Charitable Foundation. The purpose of this philanthropic foundation is to assist employees, customers and business partners in times of need, whether related to the COVID-19 pandemic, natural disasters or other crisis situations. The current pandemic is a dramatic reminder of the importance of corporate responsibility for taking care of our employees, customers and business partners, and we believe that the establishment of the SAIC Charitable Foundation underscores our commitment to the long-term sustainability of our company, our communities and the world around us.
SAIC is also committed to assessing, reducing and mitigating our environmental impact by acting as responsible environmental citizens. While SAIC as an entity has limited exposure to environmental risks due to the nature of our business, we do our part as a company by setting our own self-imposed goals related to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, energy conservation, recycling and other environmental initiatives. For example, we set an emissions reduction goal of 15% below 2014 base year emissions by 2025, resulting in a total greenhouse gas emissions reduction of more than 36%, or 9% per year. We also reduced our electrical energy consumption by approximately 17% below 2014 base year levels as of the end of the calendar year 2018.
Additional information relating to SAIC's environmental, social and governance initiatives can be found in our 2020 Sustainability and Social Responsibility Report available under the Corporate Responsibility section on investors.saic.com.

Board of Directors Meetings and Committees
The Board held tensix meetings of the entire Board during our fiscal year ended January 31, 202029, 2021 ("fiscal 2020"2021"). During fiscal 2020,2021, the independent directors met tensix times for regular board meetings, and ninefive times for executive sessions. Ms. Morea presided as the non-executive Chair of the Board at all Board meetings held during fiscal 20202021 and at all executive sessions of our independent directors as provided by our Corporate Governance Guidelines. During fiscal 2020,2021, the director attendance for Board and committee meetings averaged 94%, with no individual director attending less than 83% of such meetings.was 100%. All directors are expected to attend our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders and all of the directors who were both serving at the time of and standing for re-election at last year’s annual meeting of stockholders attended such meeting.



Science Applications International Corporation
20202021 Proxy Statement | 18

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

audit_011a.jpg
AUDIT COMMITTEE
 
The specific responsibilities of the Audit Committee are further set forth in its charter and include:
Members(1)(2)(3)
Roles and ResponsibilitiesMeetings in Fiscal 20202021
• Robert A. Bedingfield (Chair)
• Yvette M. Kanouff(4)
• David M. Kerko(3)
• Timothy J. Mayopoulos
• Steven R. Shane
•  Internal Controls and Disclosure Controls—Review and provide feedback on management’s assessment of, and the report on, the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting, and the independent, registered public accounting firm’s related report.
•   Independent Audit—Appoint, retain, oversee, evaluate, and if necessary, replace the company's independent registered public accounting firm, including the lead audit partner, for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report on our annual consolidated financial statements and performing other audit, review or attest services; pre-approve all audit and non-audit services and related fees; and evaluate the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, performance and independence, in light of among other things, non-audit services and fees.
•   Internal Audit—Review the qualifications, structure and performance of the internal audit function; review and approve the company’s internal audit plan; and periodically review findings from completed audits, status of major audits in process, and any significant difficulties, disagreements with management or restrictions encountered in the scope of the company's internal audit department’s work.
•   Financial Reporting—Review and discuss with management, the independent registered public accounting firm and the internal auditor the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q; and discuss with the independent registered public accounting firm the auditor’s judgments and recommendations about the accounting principles used to prepare our consolidated financial statements.
•��   Ethical and Legal Compliance—Review the effectiveness of our system for monitoring compliance with laws and regulations; establish procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters (including procedures for receiving and handling complaints on a confidential and anonymous basis); and evaluate and handle any complaints submitted to or reported to the Audit Committee.
•   Other Responsibilities—Discuss and evaluate our guidelines and policies regarding risk assessment and risk management; discuss our major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control those exposures; and review our litigation, government investigation and legal compliance matters that could have a significant impact on our financial statements.
64
(1)
(1)    The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is independent for purposes of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, as well as for purposes of the requirements of the Exchange Act.
(2)The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee qualifies as an Audit Committee “financial expert” as defined by the rules under the Exchange Act. The backgrounds and experience of the Audit Committee financial experts are set forth above in “Proposal 1—Election of Directors.”
(3)Mark J. Johnson, a former member of the Board, served on the Audit Committee for part of fiscal 2020. He did not stand for re-election at the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders.
(4)Ms. Kanouff began serving on the Audit Committee effective as of August 27, 2019.

(2)    The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee qualifies as an Audit Committee “financial expert” as defined by the rules under the Exchange Act. The backgrounds and experience of the Audit Committee financial experts are set forth above in “Proposal 1—Election of Directors.”

(3)    Mr. Kerko served on the Audit Committee for fiscal 2021. He resigned from the Board and the Audit Committee effective as of February 12, 2021.
19 | saic.com

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


riska011a.jpg
RISK OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE(1)
 
The responsibilities of the Risk Oversight Committee are further set forth in its charter and include:
 
MembersRoles and ResponsibilitiesMeetings held in  Fiscal 20202021
•
John J. Hamre (Chair)
•
Yvette M. Kanouff(2)
•
Nazzic S. Keene
•
Katharina G. McFarland
•
Donna S. Morea
•   Monitoring and Overseeing Regulatory, Enterprise and Strategic Risk Areas, including reviewing the following—operational, compliance and reputation risk management activities; and enterprise legal and strategic risk management activities, material regulatory matters, technology oversight and cyber risk.
•   Monitoring Policies and Practices Relating to Ethics, Compliance, and Corporate Responsibility, including reviewing the following—our Code of Conduct; third-party risk; safety; environmental, sustainability and governance matters; contributions to charitable and other tax-exempt organizations; and political contributions and government relations.
•   Overseeing Case Management and Personal Conflict of Interest Review Process for Executive Officers and Independent Directors, including—the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints involving alleged misconduct, unethical behavior, violation of the Company’s policies or potential conflict of interest involving an executive officer or any other person or matter of concern presented to the Committee by the Board.
•   Overseeing the Company's Classified Business, including—the general oversight of the Company's classified business activities and making recommendations to the Board and management concerning the review of the strategic, operational and financial aspects of the Company’s classified business; and the review of policies, processes, procedures, training, risk assessment and management activities applicable to the Company’s classified business activities to the extent that they deviate from those applicable to the Company’s non-classified business activities.
24
(1)The Risk Oversight Committee was established by the Board effective as of August 1, 2019, resulting from the combination of the Board's former Classified Business Oversight Committee (the "CBOC") and former Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Committee (the "ECRC"). Prior to such combination, the CBOC held one meeting and the ECRC held two meetings during fiscal 2020.
(2)Ms. Kanouff began serving on the Risk Oversight Committee effective as of August 27, 2019.


Science Applications International Corporation
2020 Proxy Statement | 20

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

human_resourcesa011a.jpg
HUMAN RESOURCES AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
 
The responsibilities of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee are further set forth in its charter and include:
 
Members(1)(2)(3)(4)(7)
Roles and ResponsibilitiesMeetings held in  Fiscal 20202021
•
Steven R. Shane (Chair)
•
Robert A. Bedingfield(5)
•
Carol A. Goode
(6)•Garth N. Graham(2)
•
David M. Kerko(3)


• determiningDetermining the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and reviewing and approving the compensation of our other executive officers;
• reviewingReviewing and evaluating, with the Chief Executive Officer, the long-range plans for management succession;
• exercisingExercising all rights, authority and functions reserved to such committee under all of our equity, retirement and other compensation plans;
•  approvingApproving and making recommendations to the Board regarding non-employee director compensation;
•  preparingPreparing an annual report on executive compensation for inclusion in our proxy statement or Annual Report on Form 10-K in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC; and
• periodicallyPeriodically reviewing our human resources strategy, policies and programs.
65
(1)Science Applications International Corporation
2021 Proxy Statement | 20

 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
(1)    The Board has determined that each member of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee is independent for purposes of our Corporate Governance Guidelines.
(2)Deborah B. Dunie, a former member of the Board, served on the Human Resources and Compensation Committee for part of fiscal 2020. She did not stand for re-election at the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders.
(3)Edward J. Sanderson, a former member of the Board, served on the Human Resources and Compensation Committee for part of fiscal 2020. He retired and did not stand for re-election at the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders.
(4)Ms. Morea served as a member of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee for fiscal 2020 until August 27, 2019.
(5)Mr. Bedingfield was appointed to the Human Resources and Compensation Committee effective as of August 1, 2019.
(6)Ms. Goode was appointed to the Human Resources and Compensation Committee effective as of August 27, 2019.
(7) Mr. Mayopoulos served as a member of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee is independent for purposes of our Corporate Governance Guidelines.
(2)    Dr. Graham was appointed to the Human Resources and Compensation Committee effective March 15, 2021.
(3)    Mr. Kerko served on the Human Resources and Compensation Committee for fiscal 2020 until August 1, 2019.2021. He resigned from the Board and the Human Resources and Compensation Committee effective as of February 12, 2021.
The Committee’s processes and procedures for the consideration and determination of executive compensation are discussed in further detail under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below.

Role of Independent Consultant
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee has retained Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. as its independent compensation consultant to assist the Committee in evaluating executive compensation programs and in setting executive officer compensation. The consultant only serves the Human Resources and Compensation Committee in an advisory role and does not decide or approve any compensation actions. The consultant reports directly to the Human Resources and Compensation Committee and does not perform any services for management. The consultant’s duties include the following:
•    reviewing our total compensation philosophy, peer group and target competitive positioning for reasonableness and appropriateness;
•    reviewing our overall executive compensation program and advising the Committee on evolving best practices;
•    providing independent analyses and recommendations to the Committee on executive officers’ compensation and new compensation and benefits programs that management submits to the Committee for approval; and
•    reviewing the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of our proxy statement.
The consultant interacts directly with members of management only on matters under the Human Resources and Compensation Committee’s oversight and with the knowledge and permission of the Committee. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. pursuant to SEC rules and concluded that the firm’s work for the Committee does not raise any conflict of interest.

21    | saic.com

 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the members of our Human Resources and Compensation Committee has,have, at any time, been an officer or employee of ours. None of our executive officers currently serves,serve, or in the past fiscal year hashave served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board or Human Resources and Compensation Committee.
nominatinga011a.jpg
NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
COMMITTEE
 
The responsibilities of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are further set forth in its charter and include:
 
Members(1)(2)(3)
Roles and ResponsibilitiesMeetings held in  Fiscal 20202021
•
Timothy J. Mayopoulos (Chair)
•
Carol A. Goode(4)
•
John J. Hamre
•
Katharina G. McFarland(5)
•
Donna S. Morea
•  evaluating,Evaluating, identifying and recommending director nominees, including nominees proposed by stockholders;
•  reviewingReviewing and making recommendations regarding the composition and procedures of the Board;
•  makingMaking recommendations regarding the size, composition and charters of the Board’s committees;
•  developingDeveloping and recommending to the Board a set of corporate governance principles, including recommending an independent director to serve as non-executive Chair of the Board or as Lead Director (as applicable); and
•   developingDeveloping and overseeing an annual self-evaluation process of the Board and its committees.
43
(1)The Board has determined that each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is independent for purposes of our Corporate Governance Guidelines.21 | saic.com

(2)Deborah B. Dunie, a former member of the Board, served on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for part of fiscal 2020. She did not stand for re-election at the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders.CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
(3)Edward J. Sanderson, a former member of the Board, served on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for part of fiscal 2020. He retired and did not stand for re-election at the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders.
(4)Ms. Goode began serving on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee effective as of August 27, 2019.
(5)Ms. McFarland began serving on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee effective as of August 1, 2019.
(1)    The Board has determined that each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is independent for purposes of our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

Director Nominations Process
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee utilizes a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for directors. The Committee regularly assesses the Board’s current and projected strengths and needs by, among other things, reviewing the Board’s current profile, the criteria for Board membership described on page 16 of this Proxy Statement and our current and future needs.
To the extent that vacancies on the Board are anticipated or otherwise arise, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee prepares a target candidate profile and develops an initial list of director candidates identified by the current members of the Board, business contacts, community leaders and members of management. The Committee may also retain a professional search firm to assist it in developing a list of qualified candidates. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also considers any stockholder recommendations for director nominees that are properly received.
The Committee then screens and evaluates the resulting slate of director candidates to identify those individuals who best fit the target candidate profile and Board membership criteria and provides the Board with its recommendations. The Board then considers the recommendations and votes on whether to nominate the director candidate for election by the stockholders at the annual meeting or to appoint the director candidate to fill a vacancy on the Board.

Science Applications International Corporation
2020 Proxy Statement | 22

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 
Stockholder Nominations
Any stockholder may nominate a person for election as a director by complying with the procedures set forth in our bylaws. Under Section 3.03 of our bylaws, in order for a stockholder to nominate a person for election as a director, the stockholder must give timely notice to our Corporate Secretary prior to the meeting at which directors are to be elected. To be timely, notice must be delivered to the Corporate Secretary not later than the close of business on the 90th day, nor earlier than the close of business on the 120th day, prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting. If the date of the annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 70 days after such anniversary date, however, notice by the stockholder must be delivered not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to that annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the 90th day prior to that annual meeting or the 10th day following the day on which we first publicly announce the date of that annual meeting, whichever occurs later.
The stockholder’sstockholder��s notice must include certain information as further provided in Section 3.03 of our bylaws about the nominee, the stockholder and the underlying beneficial owner, if any, including his or her respective name, age, address, occupation, shares, rights to acquire shares, information about derivatives, hedges, short positions, understandings or agreements regarding the economic and voting interests of the nominee, the stockholder and related persons with respect to our stock, if any, and any other information as would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of the proposed nominee. In addition, the notice must contain certain information about the stockholder proposing to nominate that person. We may require any proposed nominee to furnish such other information as may reasonably be required to determine the eligibility of the proposed nominee to serve as a director. A stockholder’s notice must be updated, if necessary, so that the information submitted is true and correct as of the record date for determining stockholders entitled to receive notice of the meeting.

Mandatory Retirement Policy
The Board has adopted a mandatory retirement age of 75 for independent directors and 65 for employee directors. It is the general policy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee not to nominate candidates for re-election at any annual stockholder meeting to be held after he or she has attained the applicable retirement age. 

Board of Directors Compensation
The Board uses a combination of cash retainers, fees and stock-basedequity-based incentives to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve as directors. In determining director compensation, the Board considers the significant amount of time required of our directors in fulfilling their duties, as well as the skill and expertise of our directors. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee periodically reviews director compensation with the assistance of our independent compensation consultant and recommends to the Board the form and amount of compensation to be provided. The director compensation described below represents the total compensation received by our non-employee directors for their service.
Science Applications International Corporation
2021 Proxy Statement | 22

 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Cash Compensation
Our directors receive a cash retainer for their service on the Board. For fiscal 2020,2021, the annual retainer was $100,000$107,500 and the annual retainer for the Chair of each committee of the Board was an additional $15,000, except for the Chair of the Audit and Human Resources and Compensation Committees where the annual retainer is an additional $20,000, and the former Classified Business Oversight Committee where the annual retainer was an additional $10,000. The annual retainer for the Chair of the Risk Oversight Committee that was established as of August 1, 2019 was $15,000.$20,000. The annual retainer for the independent Chair of the Board was an additional $160,000. These retainers are paid quarterly in advance. In addition to the cash retainers, non-employee directors also receive $2,000 for each meeting of the Board and each committee of the Board that they attend beginning with the second meeting above the standard number of meetings over the course of a given year. We also reimburse our directors for expenses incurred while attending meetings or otherwise performing services as a director. Based on the Human Resources and Compensation Committee review of the director compensation program with our independent compensation consultant, the Board approved an increase to the annual retainers for non-employee directors from $100,000$107,500 to $107,500$115,000 effective January 1, 2020.2021. The Board also approved an increase to the annual retainer for the Independent Chair of the Board from $160,000 to $175,000 effective January 1, 2021. There were no changes to the annual Chair retainer fees for the Board and each current committee of the Board remained the same.

23    | saic.com

 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board.
 
Equity Compensation
Directors are eligible to receive equity awards under our equity incentive plan. For fiscal 2020,2021, each director was granted equity awards consisting of $100,000$157,500 in value of restricted stock units ("RSUs") and $50,000 in value of options to purchase shares of our common stock.. These equity awards vest on the earlier of one year from the date of grant or on the date of the next annual meeting of stockholders following the date of grant. If a director retires due to our mandatory retirement policy, the director’s equity awards continue to vest as scheduled and options remain exercisable for the remainder of the option term.scheduled. Based on the Human Resources and Compensation Committee review of the director compensation program with our independent compensation consultant, the Board approved eliminating stock option grants and increasing the value of RSUs granted to each director from $157,500 to $157,500,$160,000 effective as of January 1, 2020.2021.

Deferral Plans
Directors are eligible to defer all or any portion of their cash retainers and fees into our Deferred Compensation Plan. This plan is described in further detail in the “Executive Compensation --— Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” section of this Proxy Statement.
The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation earned or paid to our directors for their service in fiscal 2020.2021.
  Name(1)
Fees earned or paid in cash
($)(2)
Stock awards
($) (3)
Total
($)
Robert A. Bedingfield157,375157,500314,875
Carol A. Goode137,375157,500294,875
John J. Hamre126,375157,500283,875
Yvette M. Kanouff137,375157,500294,875
David M. Kerko113,375157,500270,875
Timothy J. Mayopoulos129,691157,500287,191
Katharina G. McFarland113,375157,500270,875
Donna S. Morea309,125157,500466,625
Steven R. Shane155,375157,500312,875
  Name(1)
Fees earned or paid in cash
($)(2)

Stock awards
($) (3)

Option awards
($)(4)

Total
($)
Robert A. Bedingfield132,875
100,013
50,014
282,902
Carol A. Goode62,208
75,031
37,512
174,751
John J. Hamre116,375
100,013
50,014
266,402
Yvette M. Kanouff62,208
75,031
37,512
174,751
David M. Kerko124,708
150,020
75,003
349,731
Timothy J. Mayopoulos118,875
100,013
50,014
268,902
Katharina G. McFarland124,708
150,020
75,003
349,731
Donna S. Morea279,875
100,013
50,014
429,902
Steven R. Shane140,375
100,013
50,014
290,402
(1)    Ms. Keene, our Chief Executive Officer, is not included in this table because she received no additional compensation for her service as a director.
(1)Ms. Keene, our Chief Executive Officer, is not included in this table because she received no additional compensation for her service as a director.
(2)Amounts in this column represent the aggregate dollar amount of all fees earned or paid in cash for services as a director, including annual retainer fees, committee and/or chair fees and meeting fees. Directors are eligible to defer all or any portion of their cash retainers and fees into our Deferred Compensation Plan.
(3)Amounts in this column reflect the grant date fair value computed in accordance with stock-based compensation accounting rules (FASB ASC Topic 718). For fiscal 2020, Messrs. Bedingfield, Hamre, Mayopoulos, and Shane and Ms. Morea each received 1,288 RSUs. For fiscal 2020, Mr. Kerko and Ms. McFarland each received 1,932 RSUs. For fiscal 2020, Mses. Goode and Kanouff each received 899 RSUs. For more information regarding our application of FASB ASC Topic 718, including the assumptions used in the calculations of these amounts, please refer to Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2020 filed with the SEC on March 27, 2020. At the end of fiscal 2020, the following non-employee directors held
(2)    Amounts in this column represent the aggregate dollar amount of all fees earned or paid in cash for services as a director, including annual retainer fees, committee and chair fees and meeting fees. Directors are eligible to defer all or any portion of their cash retainers and fees into our Deferred Compensation Plan.
(3)    Amounts in this column reflect the grant date fair value computed in accordance with stock-based compensation accounting rules (FASB ASC Topic 718). For fiscal 2021, each director received 1,734 RSUs. For more information regarding our application of FASB ASC Topic 718, including the assumptions used in the calculations of these amounts, please refer to Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2021 filed with the SEC on March 26, 2021. At the end of fiscal 2021, the following non-employee directors held the corresponding number of unvested stock units:

Science Applications International Corporation
2020 Proxy Statement23 | 24saic.com

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

  NameUnvested
stock units
Robert A. Bedingfield1,288
1,734
Carol A. Goode899
1,734
John J. Hamre1,288
1,734
Yvette M. Kanouff899
1,734
David M. Kerko1,932
1,734
Timothy J. Mayopoulos1,288
1,734
Katharina G. McFarland1,932
1,734
Donna S. Morea1,288
1,734
Steven R. Shane1,288
1,734
At the end of fiscal 2021, our non-employee directors held vested and unvested options to purchase the following number of shares of our common stock:
(4)Amounts in this column reflect the grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Option awards granted to Messrs. Bedingfield, Hamre, Kerko, Mayopoulos, and Shane and Mses. McFarland, Goode and Kanouff vest on the earlier of one year from the date of grant or on the date of the next annual meeting of stockholders following the date of grant. During fiscal 2020, Messrs. Bedingfield, Hamre, Mayopoulos, and Shane and Ms. Morea were each issued nonstatutory options to purchase 2,876 shares of our common stock. Mr. Kerko and Ms. McFarland were each issued nonstatutory options to purchase 4,313 shares of our common stock. Mses. Goode and Kanouff were each issued nonstatutory options to purchase 2,006 shares of our common stock. At the end of fiscal 2020, our non-employee directors, held vested and unvested options to purchase the following number of shares of our common stock:
  NameAggregate shares subject
to outstanding options
Robert A. Bedingfield32,773
26,495
Carol A. Goode2,006
John J. Hamre8,451
Yvette M. Kanouff2,006
David M. Kerko4,313
Timothy J. Mayopoulos17,481
Katharina G. McFarland4,313
Donna S. Morea32,773
26,495
Steven R. Shane32,773
17,481
Stock Ownership Guidelines and Policies
The Board believes that directors should acquire and hold shares of our stock in an amount that is meaningful and appropriate. To encourage directors to have a material investment in our stock, the Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines that call for directors to hold shares of our stock with a value of at least five times the amount of each director's annual cash retainer. Board members are required to hold all shares of stock acquired under our equity programs until this target value is achieved. In addition to these ownership guidelines, our directors are also subject to policies that prohibit certain short-term or speculative transactions in our securities that we believe carry a greater risk of liability for insider trading violations or may create an appearance of impropriety. Our guidelines require directors to obtain preclearance from our General Counsel for all transactions in our securities. During fiscal 2020,2021, all members of the Board were in compliance with these stock ownership guidelines.

Related Party Transactions
The Board has adopted written policies and procedures for the review and approval of transactions between us and certain “related parties,” which are generally considered to be our directors and executive officers, nominees for director, holders of five percent or more of our outstanding capital stock and members of their immediate families. The Board has delegated to the Risk Oversight Committee the authority to review and approve the material terms of any proposed related party transaction. If a proposed related party transaction involves a non-employee director or nominee for election as a director and may be material to a consideration of that person’s independence, the matter is also considered by the Chair of the Board and the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
In determining whether to approve or ratify a related party transaction, the Risk Oversight Committee considers, among other factors it deems appropriate, the following factors:
•    potential benefits to us;

25    | saic.com

 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

•    the impact on a director’s or nominee’s independence or an executive officer’s relationship with or service to us; and
•    whether the related party transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third-party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction.
Science Applications International Corporation
2021 Proxy Statement | 24

 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
In deciding to approve a transaction, the Risk Oversight Committee may, in its sole discretion, impose any conditions it deems appropriate on us or the related party. Any transactions involving the compensation of executive officers, however, are to be reviewed and approved by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee. If a related party transaction will be ongoing, the Risk Oversight Committee may establish guidelines to be followed in our ongoing dealings with the related party. Thereafter, the Risk Oversight Committee will review and assess ongoing relationships with the related party on at least an annual basis to determine whether they are in compliance with the Committee’s guidelines and that the related party transaction remains appropriate.
We engage in transactions and have relationships with many entities, including educational and professional organizations, in the ordinary course of our business. Some of our directors, executive officers or their immediate family members may be directors, officers, partners, employees or stockholders of these entities. We carry out transactions with these firms on customary terms. There were no transactions during fiscal 20202021 in which any related party had a direct or indirect material interest. 

Science Applications International Corporation
2020 Proxy Statement | 26

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Communication with the Board of Directors
Any interested party may communicate with the Chair of the Board and the Chairs of our Audit, Human Resources and Compensation, Risk Oversight, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees on Board and committee related issues by sending an e-mail to the following (as applicable):
•    boardchair@saic.com;
•    auditchair@saic.com;
•    compensationchair@saic.com;
ethicschair@saic.com;
•    riskoversightchair@saic.com; or
•    nomgovchair@saic.com.
You may also write to them or to any other director, the independent directors as a group or the Board generally at the following address:
SAIC
Attention: Corporate Secretary
12010 Sunset Hills Road
Reston, Virginia 20190
Relevant communications will be forwarded to the recipients noted in the communication. Communications sent to the Board or the independent directors as a group will be forwarded to the Chair of the Board.
 

2725 | saic.com


PROPOSAL 2 - ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

PROPOSAL 2 - ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
 
We are providing our stockholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC.
We urge stockholders to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section ("CD&A") contained in this Proxy Statement, which describes in detail how we closely align the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our stockholders. As described in the CD&A, our compensation programs are designed to:
•    pay for performance by tying a majority of an executive officer’s compensation to the attainment of financial and other performance measures that, the Board believes, promotes the creation of long-term stockholder value and positions the company for long-term success;
•    generally provide the same types of benefits for executive officers as other employees, with no pension or death benefits for executive officers;
•    target total direct compensation at the median level among companies with which we compete for executive talent;
•    enable us to recover, or “clawback,” incentive compensation if there is any material restatement of our financial results, or if an executive officer is involved in misconduct;
•    require our executive officers to own a significant amount of shares of our common stock;
•    avoid incentives that encourage unnecessary or excessive risk-taking; and
•    compete effectively for talented executives who will contribute to our long-term success.  
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee and the Board believe that these programs and policies are effective in implementing our pay for performance philosophy and achieving its goals. This non-binding, advisory stockholder vote, commonly known as “Say-on-Pay,” gives you, as a stockholder, the opportunity to advise whether or not you approve of our executive compensation programs and policies by voting on the following resolution:
RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and any related material as set forth in this Proxy Statement.
The vote on this resolution is not intended to address any specific element of compensation; rather, the vote relates to the compensation of our named executive officers, as described in the CD&A and Executive Compensation sections of this Proxy Statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC. The vote is advisory, which means that the vote is not binding on the company, our Board or the Human Resources and Compensation Committee. However, as an expression of our stockholders’ view, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee considers the vote when making future executive compensation decisions.
At our 20192020 annual meeting of stockholders, our Say-on-Pay proposal received the support of approximately 96%97% of the votes cast by our stockholders. Our Board and the Human Resources and Compensation Committee believe that this vote reflected our stockholders’ support for the decisions made with respect to the compensation of our named executive officers for our fiscal year ended February 1, 2019.January 31, 2020.

Vote Required
The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present or represented and entitled to vote either in person or by proxy is required to approve Proposal 2. Broker non-votes are not entitled to vote on this proposal and will not be counted in evaluating the results of the vote. Abstentions have the effect of a vote against the proposal. This advisory vote on executive compensation is non-binding.

Recommendation of the Board
The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the non-binding, advisory approval of the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.  

Science Applications International Corporation
20202021 Proxy Statement | 2826


PROPOSAL 3 - ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

PROPOSAL 3 - ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

We are providing our stockholders with the opportunity to vote, on a non-binding, advisory basis, on whether future advisory votes on executive compensation, or “Say-on-Pay,” of the nature reflected in Proposal 2 above should occur every year, every two years or every three years.

At our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders, the stockholders of the company recommended one year as the frequency of advisory voting on executive compensation. We have had annual Say-on-Pay votes since our 2014 annual meeting. After careful consideration of the three alternatives, the Board believes that continuing to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation every year is the most appropriate policy for the company at this time and recommends that stockholders vote for future advisory votes on executive compensation to occur every year.

While our executive compensation programs are designed to promote a long-term connection between pay and performance, the Board recognizes that executive compensation decisions and disclosures are made annually and that an annual advisory vote on executive compensation would provide us with more direct and immediate feedback. Stockholders should note, however, that because the advisory vote on executive compensation occurs after the beginning of the compensation year, it may not be appropriate or even feasible to change the company’s current annual or multi-year executive compensation programs in response to any one year’s advisory vote before the following year’s annual meeting of stockholders. If we decide that responsive changes are appropriate, but immediate implementation is not practical, the impact of those changes may not be fully reflected in the following year’s proxy statement. In addition, the different elements of our executive compensation programs are designed to operate in an integrated manner and to complement one another, which may affect our ability to consider and implement responsive changes.

Vote Required
This advisory vote on the frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes is non-binding. Stockholders will be able to specify one of four choices for this Proposal 3 on the proxy and voting instruction card: one year, two years, three years or abstain. The frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes receiving the highest number of votes (one, two or three years) by stockholders will be considered the frequency recommended by stockholders. Abstentions, a failure to vote or broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the vote on the matter.

Stockholders are not voting to approve or disapprove the Board’s recommendation. We currently expect to conduct an annual advisory vote on executive compensation, unless the voting results indicate a stockholder preference for a less frequent vote. In any case, the Board may vary its practice in future years based on factors such as discussions with stockholders and the adoption of material changes to compensation programs.

Recommendation of the Board
The Board unanimously recommends stockholders vote "ONE YEAR" as the frequency to conduct future advisory votes on executive compensation.


29    | saic.com

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis ("CD&A") provides important information about our executive compensation philosophy and programs for fiscal 2020.2021. In addition, this CD&A describes compensation decisions made by our Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board (sometimes referred to in this CD&A as the "Committee"), which is responsible for overseeing the compensation programs for our executive officers, including the officers named in the executive compensation tables in this Proxy Statement (collectively, the "named executive officers").
Our Named Executive Officers for Fiscal 20202021     
  NameTitle
Nazzic S. Keene(1)
Chief Executive Officer
Anthony J. MoracoPrabu Natarajan(1)
Former Chief Executive Officer
Charles A. MathisExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Charles A. Mathis(1)
Former Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Robert S. GenterPresident, Defense and Civilian Sector
Steven G. MahonExecutive Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary
Robert S. GenterMichael W. LaRoucheExecutive Vice President, National Security and General Manager, Civilian Markets Group
James J. ScanlonExecutive Vice President and General Manager, Defense Systems Group
Karen A. Wheeler(2)
Former Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources OfficerSpace Sector
(1)Mr. Moraco retired as Chief Executive Officer effective as of July 31, 2019. Ms. Keene succeeded him as Chief Executive Officer as of such date.
(2)Ms. Wheeler served as Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer until September 30, 2019.
(1)     Mr. Mathis served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer until January 4, 2021; Mr. Natarajan succeeded him on that date.
Executive Summary
Fiscal 20202021 Business Highlights
OurFiscal 2021 was a year marked by the COVID-19 global pandemic and civil unrest across our nation that impacted the business priorities of our company. Despite unprecedented headwinds, we made substantial progress on our strategic transformation and achieved solid business performance through the incredible resilience, passion and hard work of our leaders and our employees. We progressed on commitments to drive organic growth and higher profitability, to be a destination for diverse top talent, to improve business execution and sophistication, and to achieve total shareholder return. Advances against these objectives were driven by three critical elements: refining the business strategy to focus on growth; aligning the organization and building a best-in-class leadership team; and laying the foundation of an inclusive, values-driven culture rooted in a common purpose - to advance the power of technology and innovation to serve and protect our world.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic fundamentally changed how we work and live. To support the well-being of our employees and our communities, we immediately took a number of important steps. Beyond transitioning to a remote work environment, we holistically assessed our business, financial and employee impacts to best inform how to care for our people. Along with implementing protocols to protect the health and safety of our people, we provided a comprehensive set of resources and programs to support our employees’ mental and physical well-being. We also established an employee leave donation program, which generated close to $3 million of leave hours for employees unable to work due to the pandemic. In addition, we created the SAIC Charitable Foundation to provide financial support to our employees and their families in this time of crisis.

We also augmented and accelerated our focus on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) to embrace individual differences, life experiences, and capabilities, and to bring together varying perspectives to create compelling innovations and deliver exceptional business results. Central to our DEI strategy is increasing the diversity representation in our leadership, which we believe is fundamental to fostering an inclusive culture and advancing DEI at SAIC. In fiscal 2020 results reflect strong financial performance2022, executive compensation will be impacted by the achievement of specific goals for representation of women and anminorities in leadership roles. We are committed to ensuring that the diversity of our leadership fully reflects the diversity of our employee population at large.

During fiscal 2021, SAIC also expanded its portfolio with the successful integrationacquisition of Engility. We delivered margin improvement through solid programUnisys Federal to bring capabilities and contracts with scale and customer access, and to accelerate execution of our growth strategy. Record bookings and book-to-bill, strong cash flows, great stock performance, and achievingsolid organic growth rates – excluding the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic – underscore our cost synergies which provides increased momentumsuccess in delivering the value proposition to our stakeholdersa very challenging environment and accelerating profitable revenue growth.
business_highlights1a05.jpg
(1)Non-GAAP financial measure; see the Appendix to Proxy Statement for a reconciliation of such measure against the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.

position us well for growth in fiscal 2022.
Science Applications International Corporation
2020 Proxy Statement27 | 30saic.com

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
business_highlights1a.jpg

(1)    Non-GAAP financial measure; see the Appendix to Proxy Statement for a reconciliation of such measure against the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.
(2)    Excludes the impact from sale of receivables ($185 million) under the Master Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement.
We maintained our commitmentstand committed to profitable growth and long-term value creation. Full year revenue of $6.379$7.056 billion represents 37%includes growth of year-over-year growth. The revenue11% driven by the Unisys Federal acquisition and 4% excluding COVID-19 impact. This is the highest internal growth was driven primarily by our strategic acquisitionin the history of Engility.the company.
Full year adjusted EBITDA increased to 8.4%8.9% of revenues, compared to 7.6%8.4% in the prior fiscal year. The increase was driven by the acquisition of Engility, the realization of cost synergies resulting from the acquisition,Unisys Federal and strong operational execution.execution across the portfolio.
Full year operating cash flow was $458 million.$570 million after excluding sale of receivables. Cash flow generation is centralkey to our shareholder value proposition and allowed us to deliver $87 million in annual dividend payments and to repurchase $177$19 million in shares of our common stock during fiscal 2020.

2021.
Total Shareholder Return ("TSR")
as of January 31, 202029, 2021
totalshareholderreturn_1.jpgtotal_shareholderxreturn1a.jpg
TSR for fiscal year 20202021 was 32%11%, outperforming thebelow a broader market index andbut considerably above a comparable technology index fund. However, overOver a prior three-year period, the company's TSR has significantly laggedbeen generally comparable to the same broader market index and was modestly belowsignificantly above the comparable technology index.


31Science Applications International Corporation
2021 Proxy Statement | saic.com28

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Summary of Compensation Philosophy  
The company maintains a strong “pay-for-performance” compensation philosophy aimed at attracting and retaining high quality executive talent and rewarding our executive officers primarily through variable compensation. Fixed compensation (i.e., base salary) is set at appropriate levels to avoid competitive disadvantage and comprises the smallest portion of overall compensation. We believe that this philosophy serves to both encourage and recognize performance excellence and helps drive stockholder value while facilitating a sustainable fixed-cost structure.
The charts below depict approximate percentages for each element of target total direct compensation and demonstrate how compensation is significantly weighted towards variable compensation (short-term cash incentives, performance shares, RSUs and stock options).(1) The details of all executive officer compensation are provided in the "Executive Compensation" section of this Proxy Statement.
ceo_compensation1a06.jpgceo_compensation11a.jpg
ceo_compensation2a04.jpgceo_compensation21a.jpg
(1)    Because Mr. Natarajan received no incentive compensation in fiscal 2021, his compensation is not included in the elements of Other Named Executive Officers' compensation.
Total direct compensation for named executive officers is targeted at approximately median levels of compensation of comparable positions in publicly traded companies of our size and in our industry. However, consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy, actual earned compensation varies above or below the median level based on the degree to which specific performance goals are achieved, changes in our stock value over time and the individual performance of each named executive officer.
As indicated above, base salary represents a significantly smaller portion of overall compensation than variable compensation. The allocation of a meaningful portion of overall compensation to annual cash incentive awards reflects our philosophy that a meaningful portion of total compensation should reflect the actual achievement of predetermined goals. The largest portion of overall compensation for our executive officers is allocated to long-term incentives, supporting long-term value creation and aligning the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders. Performance share awards ("PSAs") to our executive officers in fiscal 20202021 are directly related to the achievement of EBITDA and annual operating cash flow over a three-year period commencing in fiscal 2020.2021. A combination of PSAs, stock options and time-based RSUs provide an appropriate balance of medium-term and long-term incentives.
By aligning significant portions of named executive officers’ compensation with profitable growth and operating cash flow, a substantial portion of total compensation for our named executive officers is directly linked to long-term sustainable stockholder returns.
Based on performance delivered by the company in fiscal 2020,2021, the calculated payout of the short-term financial portion of annual incentives was 98.2%98.7% of target, as discussed in greater detail on page 38.34. For fiscal 2020,2021, the Committee determined to apply a leadership score ranging between 1.0 and 1.2 to the calculated cash incentive awards of the Chief Executive Officer and each other named executive officer, based upon an assessment of each executive's performance in leading the business and leading employees. PSAs granted for the fiscal 20182019 through 20202021 performance period were earned at 77.9%92.2% of target ending fiscal 2020.2021.

Looking to fiscal 2022, we will maintain the short-term and long-term performance metrics used the past three fiscal years. However, we will refine our incentive plan design by introducing components that emphasize organic growth and performance relative to our peer group. Specific enhancements will include adjusting short-term incentive metrics’ performance scales to consider expected peer performance, establishing equal weightings for our short term incentive metrics and Performance Share
Science Applications International Corporation
2020 Proxy Statement29 | 32saic.com

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Plan metrics, and introducing a relative (to our peer group) Total Shareholder Return (rTSR) modifier to determine Performance Share Plan payout.

Governance of Our Compensation Programs
Our compensation programs incorporate best practices regarding corporate governance, risk mitigation and alignment of executive officers’ interests with stockholders’ interests. The following are key features of our compensation practices:
At SAIC, we ...
ü    Believe in pay for performance—simply put, we reward those who perform.
ü    Conduct an annual review by the Committee to establish a group of comparable companies to be used in compensation decisions.
ü    Review and consider feedback provided by our stockholders related to executive compensation matters.
ü    Mitigate against imprudent risk-taking through balancing features in the design of our compensation programs.
ü    Subject cash and equity-based incentive compensation to a “clawback” policy if there is a material restatement of our financial results for any reason or if the employee was involved in misconduct.
ü    Require significant stock ownership under our stock ownership guidelines.
ü    Use an independent compensation consultant who reports directly to the Committee.
ü    Provide “double-trigger” provisions for certain change in control benefits.
At SAIC, we do not ...
×     Permit cash buyout or re-pricing of underwater stock options.
×     Guarantee any bonus payouts to executive officers.
×     Provide employment agreements for executive officers.
×     Provide golden parachute excise tax gross-ups on change in control benefits.
×     Permit hedging or pledging of company stock or purchasing company stock on margin by our executive officers.
×     Offer pension benefits to our executive officers or other employees.
×     Provide excessive perquisites for executive officers.

Results of 20192020 Stockholder Advisory Vote  
Based on our stockholder advisory vote at our 20192020 annual meeting of stockholders, commonly referred to as a "Say-on-Pay" vote, our stockholders approved the compensation of our named executive officers, with approximately 96%97% of stockholder votes cast in favor of our 20192020 Say-on-Pay resolution. The Committee, which is composed exclusively of independent directors, views this level of support for our executive compensation programs as indicative of broad stockholder agreement with the pay for performance philosophy on which our executive compensation programs are premised. Accordingly, the Committee determined not to make any significant changes to our programs as a result of the "Say-on-Pay" vote at our 20192020 annual stockholders meeting.meeting of stockholders.
We welcome feedback from stockholders regarding our executive compensation programs, which are described in more detail below. Stockholders desiring to communicate with the Board or the Human Resources and Compensation Committee may do so as described under "Communication with the Board of Directors" in this Proxy Statement. The Committee will continue to take into account stockholder votes on Say-on-Pay resolutions when evaluating our compensation philosophy and making changes to our compensation programs and practices. See “Proposal 2—Advisory (Non-Binding) Vote on Executive Compensation” and “Proposal 3—Advisory (Non-Binding) Vote on Frequency of Vote on Executive Compensation” in this Proxy Statement for additional information on our resolutions for 20202021 Say-on-Pay and the frequency of future Say-on-Pay resolutions.

resolution.
33Science Applications International Corporation
2021 Proxy Statement | saic.com30

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Principal Elements and Objectives of Our Compensation Programs
Under the direction of the Committee, we provide the following principal elements of compensation to our named executive officers:

Base Salary
We provide a fixed base salarysalaries to our named executive officers based on their level of responsibility, expertise, skills, knowledge and experience and on competitive peer company and other applicable market data. We generally target our named executive officers’ base salaries at the median of the competitive market. Consistent with our philosophy of tying pay to performance, base salary represents a significantly smaller portion of overall compensation than variable compensation.

Variable Incentive CompensationBase Salary
We use a combination of cash and equity incentive awards to foster and reward performance in key areas over short-term and long-term timeframes. Our annual cash incentive awards are based upon performance against predetermined goals for the fiscal year to encourage and reward contributions to our annual financial, operating and strategic objectives. We provide equity incentive awardsfixed base salaries to our named executive officers to motivate them to stay with usbased on their level of responsibility, expertise, skills, knowledge and build long-term stockholder value through their future performance. Stock options, in particular, aid in employee retentionexperience and motivateon competitive peer company and other applicable market data. We generally target our named executive officers to build stockholder value because they may realize value only if our stock appreciates overofficers’ base salaries at the seven-year option term. The Committee generally does not consider an executive officer’s current stock or option holdings in making additional equity awards.
The following chart summarizes the relevant performance measures and time frames used for the variable pay elements in our program for fiscal 2020:
a200934varinccompa02.jpg
(1)RSUs awarded prior to fiscal 2020 vest over a four-year period in 25% installments at each anniversary of the grant date. RSUs awarded in fiscal 2020 vest over a three-year period in 33% installments at each anniversary of the grant date.

Other Benefits
We also provide our named executive officers with benefits generally available to other employees, as part of a market competitive total compensation opportunity, such as participation in our health and welfare benefits, deferred compensation and retirement programs. Our named executive officers are also entitled to certain executive severance benefits if their employment is ended due to an organizational restructure, shift in business priorities, change in leadership skill requirements or certain other terminations of employment. Our executive health benefit plan for certain executive officers, including named executive officers, provides a comprehensive medical assessment and personalized preventive strategies to maintain and improve personal health.

Science Applications International Corporation
2020 Proxy Statement | 34

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Certain Adjustments to Executive Compensation for Fiscal 2020
In connection with Mr. Moraco’s retirement and Ms. Keene’s appointment as Chief Executive Officer and a membermedian of the Board, eachcompetitive market. Consistent with our philosophy of which became effective as of July 31, 2019 (the “Effective Date”), the Board approved certain adjustmentstying pay to each of Mr. Moraco’s and Ms. Keene’s executive compensation for fiscal 2020. 
Prior to his retirement, Mr. Moraco provided certain transition services to the company through the Effective Date. In exchange for such services, among other things, (i) Mr. Moraco’sperformance, base salary increased to $1,060,000, (ii) Mr. Moraco receivedrepresents a short-term cash bonussignificantly smaller portion of $700,000, (iii) the company paid certain of Mr. Moraco’s premium costs relating to the continuation of his group health insurance coverage through the eighteen (18) month period following the Effective Date, and (iv) Mr. Moraco achieved special retirement status for the continued vesting of certain outstanding equity awards after the Effective Date.
In connection with her appointment, Ms. Keene’s annual compensation for fiscal 2020 was adjusted as follows: (i) an annual base salary of $1,000,000 effective as of April 1, 2019, (ii) a short-term incentive cash bonus target equal to 125% of her base salary, and (iii) $3,800,000 of long-term incentive awards in the form of performance shares, stock options and RSUs under the company's executive compensation plan. As an executive officer of the company, Ms. Keene also continued to participate in our Deferred Compensation Plan. As an employee director, Ms. Keene did not serve on any reportable risk committees of the Board and did not receive any additional compensation for her service as a member of the Board.


Committee Process for Determining Direct Compensation
At the beginning of each fiscal year, the Committee reviews and approves the following elements of direct compensation to be provided to our named executive officers:
base salary for the upcoming year;
payout range for the cash incentive awards that may be earned for the upcoming year and the performance goals and criteria upon which the amount of the awards will be determined;
mix and amount of equity incentive awards to be granted to our executive officers; and
payout range for PSAs that may be earned for the performance period beginning in that fiscal year and the length of the performance period, goals and criteria upon which the amount of the awards for the relevant performance period will be determined.
In determining the amounts of direct compensation to be awarded to our named executive officers, the Committee considers the company’s overall performance and competitive market data for our compensation peer group.
Company performance is the primary factor in determining variable compensation. The amount of any cash or performance-based equity incentive awards to be paid upon completion of the applicable performance period is determined based upon our achievement of short- and long-term financial goals set at the beginning of the fiscal year. The final cash incentive award payout also reflects a leadership component. The Committee retains the ability to use negative discretion to reduce payouts when appropriate.
Individual performance is a factor in setting base salaries. In determining base salaries for our named executive officers, the Committee reviews a performance assessment for each of our executive officers, as well as compensation recommendations provided by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Human Resources Officer. The Committee also considers market data, analysis and recommendations regarding executive officer compensation provided by Frederic W. Cook & Co. Inc. ("FW Cook"), its independent compensation consultant. The named executive officers do not propose their own compensation.

35    | saic.com

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The Committee assesses our Chief Executive Officer's performance. In determining compensation for our Chief Executive Officer, the Committee meets in executive session and evaluates her performance based on her achievement of performance objectives that are established at the beginning of the fiscal year. Formal input is received from the independent directors and the executive leadership team. The Committee also considers the Chief Executive Officer’s leadership contributions towards the company’s performance, including financial results, development and achievement of strategic objectives, progress in building capability among the executive leadership team, development of a succession plan for executive leadership and corporate governance leadership, as well as market data and analysis and recommendations provided by the Committee’s independent compensation consultant. The Committee determines the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation and then reviews her evaluation and compensation with the Board’s independent directors. The Chief Executive Officer does not propose her own compensation and is not present for discussions of her performance and compensation. The Independent Chair of the Board and the Chair of the Committee then present the Committee’s evaluation and compensation determination to the Chief Executive Officer.
The Committee reviews our compensation peer group annually. The Committee compares the amount of direct compensation we provide to our named executive officers to that provided by companies that we believe have similar revenues and industry focus to ours, as well as companies with whom we compete for executive talent with similar roles and responsibilities. To complete this effort, the Committee establishes a peer comparator group for each fiscal year and benchmarks each element of direct compensation (including salary, cash and equity incentives) to be provided to our named executive officers against that provided by other publicly traded engineering, information technology, consulting and defense companies, which we refer to as our “compensation peer group.” The compensation peer group used for determining fiscal 2020 target compensation consisted of the 15 companies listed below. As a result of mergers and acquisitions within the industry, six companies that were part of our fiscal 2019 compensation peer group were removed, and five companies were added to our fiscal 2020 compensation peer group.
Booz Allen Hamilton
L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc.(1)
CACI International IncLeidos, Inc.
CGI Group, Inc.ManTech International Corporation
Collins AerospaceMAXIMUS, Inc.
Harris Corporation(1)

Parsons Corporation
Huntington Ingalls IndustriesPerspecta
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.Unisys Corporation
KBR, Inc.
(1)Harris Corporation and L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. merged to form L3Harris Technologies, Inc., as of June 29, 2019.
The compensation peer group is structured so that no company within the group has annual revenues greater than three times or less than approximately one-third of our estimated revenues for the fiscal year in which the peer group is reviewed. For comparison purposes, for fiscal 2020, our estimated annual revenues were at approximately the 48th percentile of the revenues of the compensation peer group. In addition to the compensation peer group, data from three nationally-recognized, broad-based third-party surveys is compiled and provided for the Committee’s consideration regarding compensation that other comparably-sized companies provide to their chief executive officer, chief financial officer and other members of senior management. The identity of the individual companies comprising the survey data is not disclosed to the Committee in its evaluation process. The Committee considers this survey data and analysis along with the compensation peer group data when evaluating appropriate levels of direct compensation. To be competitive in the market for our executive-level talent, we generally target overall compensation for our named executive officers at approximately the market median, although the actual cash incentive awards paid and performance shares earned vary, consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy, based on operating performance and may therefore generate realized compensation that is higher or lower than the market median.variable compensation.


Components of Fiscal 2020 Compensation Programs
Base Salary
We provide fixed base salaries to our named executive officers based on their level of responsibility, expertise, skills, knowledge and experience and on competitive peer company and other applicable market data. We generally target our named executive officers’ base salaries at the median of the competitive market. Consistent with our philosophy of tying pay to performance, base salary represents a significantly smaller portion of overall compensation than variable compensation.

Variable Incentive Compensation
We use a combination of cash and equity incentive awards to foster and reward performance in key areas over short-term and long-term timeframes. Our annual cash incentive awards are based upon performance against predetermined goals for the fiscal year to encourage and reward contributions to our annual financial, operating and strategic objectives. We provide equity incentive awards to our named executive officers to motivate them to stay with us and build long-term stockholder value through their future performance.
The following chart summarizes the relevant performance measures and time frames used for the variable pay elements in our program for fiscal 2021:
variable_incentivexcompensa.jpg
(1)    RSUs awarded prior to fiscal 2020 vest over a four-year period in 25% installments at each anniversary of the grant date. RSUs awarded in fiscals 2020 and 2021 vest over a three-year period in 33% installments at each anniversary of the grant date.


31 | saic.com

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Committee Process for Determining Direct Compensation
At the beginning of each fiscal year, the Committee reviews and approves the following elements of direct compensation to be provided to each of our named executive officers:
•    base salary for the upcoming year;
•    payout range for the annual cash incentive awards that may be earned for the upcoming year and the performance goals and criteria upon which the amount of the awards will be determined;
•    mix and amount of equity incentive awards to be granted to our executive officers; and
•    payout range for PSAs that may be earned for the performance period beginning in that fiscal year and the length of the performance period, goals and criteria upon which the amount of the awards for the relevant performance period will be determined.
In determining the amounts of direct compensation to be awarded to our named executive officers, the Committee considers the company’s overall performance and competitive market data for our compensation peer group.
Company performance is the primary factor in determining variable compensation. The amount of any cash or performance-based equity incentive awards to be paid upon completion of the applicable performance period is determined based upon our achievement of short- and long-term financial goals set at the beginning of the fiscal year or performance period, as the case may be. The final cash incentive award payout also reflects an individual leadership component. In fiscal 2022, the individual leadership component will be based, in part, on the achievement of specific diversity goals for representation of women and minorities in leadership roles. The Committee retains the ability to use negative discretion to reduce payouts when appropriate.
Individual performance is a factor in setting base salaries. In determining base salaries for our named executive officers, the Committee reviews a performance assessment for each of our executive officers, as well as compensation recommendations provided by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Human Resources Officer. The Committee also considers market data, analysis and recommendations regarding executive officer compensation provided by Frederic W. Cook & Co. Inc. ("FW Cook"), its independent compensation consultant. The named executive officers do not propose their own compensation.
The Committee assesses our Chief Executive Officer's performance. In determining compensation for our Chief Executive Officer, the Committee meets in executive session and evaluates her performance based on her achievement of performance objectives that are established at the beginning of the fiscal year. Formal input is received from the independent directors and the executive leadership team. The Committee also considers the Chief Executive Officer’s leadership contributions towards the company’s performance, including financial results, development and achievement of strategic objectives, progress in building capability among the executive leadership team, development of a succession plan for executive leadership and corporate governance leadership, as well as market data and analysis and recommendations provided by the Committee’s independent compensation consultant. The Committee determines the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation and then reviews her evaluation and compensation with the Board’s independent directors. The Chief Executive Officer does not propose her own compensation and is not present for discussions of her performance and compensation. The Independent Chair of the Board and the Chair of the Committee then present the Committee’s evaluation and compensation determination to the Chief Executive Officer.
The Committee reviews our compensation peer group annually. The Committee compares the amount of direct compensation we provide to our named executive officers to that provided by companies that we believe have similar revenues and industry focus to ours, as well as companies with whom we compete for executive talent with similar roles and responsibilities. To complete this effort, the Committee establishes a peer comparator group for each fiscal year and benchmarks each element of direct compensation (including salary, cash and equity incentives) to be provided to our named executive officers against that provided by other publicly traded engineering, information technology, consulting and defense companies, which we refer to as our “compensation peer group.” The compensation peer group used for determining fiscal 2021 target compensation consisted of the 15 companies listed below.
Science Applications International Corporation
2021 Proxy Statement | 32

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Booz Allen Hamilton
L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc.(1)
CACI International IncLeidos, Inc.
CGI Group, Inc.ManTech International Corporation
Collins AerospaceMAXIMUS, Inc.
Harris Corporation(1)
Parsons Corporation
Huntington Ingalls IndustriesPerspecta
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.Unisys Corporation
KBR, Inc.
(1) Harris Corporation and L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc., merged to form L3Harris
Technologies, Inc., as of June 29, 2019.
The compensation peer group is structured so that no company within the group has annual revenues greater than three times or less than approximately one-third of our estimated revenues for the fiscal year in which the peer group is reviewed. For comparison purposes, for fiscal 2021, our estimated annual revenues were at approximately the 48th percentile of the revenues of the compensation peer group. In addition to the compensation peer group, data from three nationally-recognized, broad-based third-party surveys is compiled and provided for the Committee’s consideration regarding compensation that other comparably-sized companies provide to their chief executive officer, chief financial officer and other members of senior management. The identity of the individual companies comprising the survey data is not disclosed to the Committee in its evaluation process. The Committee considers this survey data and analysis along with the compensation peer group data when evaluating appropriate levels of direct compensation. To be competitive in the market for our executive-level talent, we generally target overall compensation for our named executive officers at approximately the market median, although the actual cash incentive awards paid and performance shares earned vary, consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy, based on operating performance and may therefore generate realized compensation that is higher or lower than the market median.

Components of Fiscal 2021 Compensation Programs
Base Salary
In reviewing and approving the fiscal 20202021 base salaries for our named executive officers, the Committee considered its independent compensation consultant’s analysis of pay levels among the compensation peer group and survey data, which indicated that base salaries for our named executive officers were generally competitive relative to the peer group median and to survey data median for all executive officers. Actual individual base salary amounts also reflect the Committee’s judgment with respect to each named executive officer’s responsibility, performance, experience and other factors, the individual’s historical

Science Applications International Corporation
2020 Proxy Statement | 36

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

compensation and any retention concerns. The Committee reviews named executive officers’ base salaries annually or at the time of a promotion or a substantial change in responsibilities based on the above-described criteria. For example, the Committee determined that significant increases to the scope and revenue of the lines of business that Mr. Genter and Mr. LaRouche oversee warranted commensurate base salary increases.
In fiscal 2020,2021, base salaries for the named executive officers were increased to align with the peer group median levels and to maintain competitiveness of our compensation program and, in the case of Ms. Keene, to reflect increases in roles and responsibilities.program. The fiscal 20202021 base salaries and the percentage increases from fiscal 20192020 base salaries for our named executive officers are set forth below:
  NameFiscal 2021 Base SalaryPercentage Increase from Fiscal 2020 Base Salary
Nazzic S. Keene$1,075,0007.5 %
Prabu Natarajan(1)
$600,000— 
Charles A. Mathis$575,0004.5 %
Robert S. Genter$600,00033.3 %
Steven G. Mahon$600,0004.3 %
Michael W. LaRouche$475,00018.8 %
(1)    Mr. Natarajan joined the Company in fiscal 2021.
  NameFiscal 2020 Base Salary
Percentage Increase from Fiscal 2019 Base Salary(1)

Nazzic S. Keene$1,000,00033.3%
Anthony J. Moraco$1,060,0002.9%
Charles A. Mathis$550,0004.8%
Steven G. Mahon$575,00015.0%
Robert S. Genter$450,0005.9%
James J. Scanlon$450,0005.9%
Karen A. Wheeler$415,0007.8%
(1)Ms. Keene's salary percentage increase is over her fiscal 2019 base salary as the company's Chief Operating Officer.33 | saic.com

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Annual Cash Incentive Awards
Each named executive officer’s total fiscal 20202021 short-term incentive ("STI") award depended upon the achievement of specific financial performance goals approved by our Committee and described below.
Performance goals for cash incentive awards. At the beginning of each fiscal year, the Committee sets and approves threshold, target and maximum performance goals for the upcoming year based on objective financial goals. Further, the Committee also reviews and approves the corresponding target cash incentive awards based upon the achievement of those goals. No amount is payable for below-threshold performance. When threshold performance is met, payouts are determined on a straight-line basis between threshold and target performance and between target and maximum performance.
Under our short-term incentive plan for fiscal 2020:2021:
•    The award was determined by our company performance as well as a leadership component.
•    The financial performance measures used - EBITDA, revenue, and cash flow generation - directly align to our overall strategy and support increases in stockholder value. EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure and should be read in conjunction with net income, a GAAP financial measure; see the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations section in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2020,29, 2021, for further information.
•    The individual leadership component considered both business leadership competencies as well as people leadership competencies and could be used to modify and apply discretion to the final award amount based on the named executive officer’s performance during the year.
Performance measures for fiscal 2020.2021. The financial performance measures for fiscal 20202021 were closely aligned with the company’s strategy for sustained profitable growth and long-term value creation.
For fiscal 2020,2021, we maintained the financial measures and their relative weightings that we used in fiscal 2019.2020. The EBITDA metric, assigned a 50% relative weighting, emphasizes the focus on our profitability, which is critical to our long-term growth. The revenue and operating cash flow metrics, with weightings of 35% and 15%, respectively, focus the management team on revenue and cash flow generation. The financial performance measures, their relative weightings, the targeted and maximum achievement levels and actual performance for our short-term incentive program for fiscal 2020,2021, as approved by the Committee, were as follows:

37    | saic.com

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Fiscal 20202021 Short-Term Incentive Awards
Financial Measures(1)
WeightThresholdTargetMaximum
2021 Actual(1)
% of Target AchievedPayout %
2020 Actual(1)
Adjusted EBITDA50 %$554M$652M$750M$643M98.6 %95.4 %$538M
Revenue35 %$6.593B$7.326B$8.059B$7.318B99.9 %99.5 %$6.379B
Adjusted Operating Cash Flow15 %$392M$490M$588M$498M101.6 %108.2 %$454M
Weighted Average for Financial Goals98.7 %
Financial Measures(1)
Weight
ThresholdTargetMaximum
2020 Actual(1)
% of Target Achieved
Payout %
2019 Actual(1)
Adjusted EBITDA50%$427M$534M$641M$538M100.7%103.7%$347M
Revenue35%$5.850B$6.500B$7.150B$6.379B98.1%90.7%$4.585B
Adjusted Operating Cash Flow15%$346M$461M$576M$454M98.5%97%$262M
Weighted Average for Financial Goals    98.2% 
(1)(1)    See the Appendix to this Proxy Statement for a reconciliation as to how each adjusted non-GAAP performance measure is calculated as compared to the most closely comparable GAAP measure.

Determination of cash incentive award amounts. For fiscal 2020,2021, the Committee set the target amount of the cash incentive award at 125%130% of base salary for the Chief Executive Officer and between 60%75% and 85% of base salary for the other named executive officers based on applicable market data. In determining the payout level amount, the Committee applied the weighted average payout for financial goals (98.2%(98.7% in fiscal 20202021 as calculated in the table above) to the target cash incentive amount and further applied a leadership factor determined by the Committee for the Chief Executive Officer, and with input from the Chief Executive Officer for the other named executive officers. The leadership scores for the executive officers ranged between 1.0 and 1.2 based upon an assessment of each executive's performance in leading the business and leading employees. For our named executive officers, the target cash incentive award amounts as a percentage of base salary and award amounts earned in fiscal 20202021 were as follows:
Name(1)
Base Salary
STI Target as % of Base Salary
Financial Score(2)

Cash Incentive Amount Paid
Nazzic S. Keene
$1,000,000
125%98.2%
$1,227,000
Charles A. Mathis
$550,000
85%98.2%
$458,898
Steven G. Mahon
$575,000
75%98.2%
$423,315
Robert S. Genter
$450,000
60%101.0%
$327,337
James J. Scanlon
$450,000
60%95.1%
$256,716
(1)A short-term incentive program target was not established for Mr. Moraco, the company's former CEO, for fiscal 2020. The Board approved a short-term cash incentive payment amount of $242,084 to Ms. Wheeler, SAIC's former Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer, based on an established target of 70% of base salary prorated for fiscal 2020 through December 1, 2019, her date of retirement.
(2)To determine Mr. Genter and Mr. Scanlon’s fiscal 2020 cash incentive amount paid, the Committee applied a financial score based on a 75%/25% weighting of the 98.2% enterprise financial score and the financial score of the customer groups that they lead, respectively.

Science Applications International Corporation
20202021 Proxy Statement | 3834

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
NameBase SalarySTI Target as % of Base Salary
Financial Score(1)
Cash Incentive Amount Paid
Nazzic S. Keene$1,075,000130 %98.7 %$1,655,702
Charles A. Mathis$575,00085 %98.7 %$482,543
Robert S. Genter$600,00080 %101.2 %$534,283
Steven G. Mahon$600,00075 %98.7 %$533,142
Michael W. LaRouche$475,00080 %103.4 %$432,379
(1)    To determine Mr. Genter and Mr. LaRouche's fiscal 2021 cash incentive amount paid, the Committee applied a financial score based on a 75%/25% weighting of the 98.7% enterprise financial score and the financial score of the business sectors that they lead, respectively.

Long-Term Incentive Awards
We generally target our named executive officers’ long-term incentive awardsaward opportunities at the median of the competitive market. In fiscal 2020,2021, we provided the following forms of long-term incentive compensation to our named executive officers:
incentiveawardsa08.jpgincentiveawards1a.jpg
Performance Shares—Incentivize our named executive officers to achieve specific measurable financial goals over a three-year performance cycle. Earned shares vest and are issued at the end of the performance cycle and range from 0% for below threshold performance to 150%200% of target number of shares for maximum performance. PSAs are granted in overlapping annual cycles and serve as a tool to align pay and company performance and to retain our named executive officers. Dividend equivalents are accumulated in cash and are paid at the end of the three-year performance cycle to the extent that the underlying share awards are earned.
Restricted Stock Units—Align pay and company performance as reflected in our stock price, encourage retention of our named executive officers’ services and promote continued investment by our executives in company stock. RSUs awarded in fiscal 20202021 vest over a three-year period in 33% installments at each anniversary of the grant date. Dividend equivalents on unvested RSUs accumulate in cash and are paid when and if the underlying RSUs vest.
Stock Options—Strongly alignAlign named executive officer and stockholder interests by having value only if the stock price increases over the term of the option. Stock options vest in 33% installments at the end of each of the first three years following grant and expire at the end of the seventh year.
Fiscal 2020-20222021-2023 Performance Share Plan Awards
For fiscal 2020,2021, 50% of the long-term incentives awarded to our named executive officers were provided in the form of performance shares (valued at target payout). The performance measures and corresponding weightings for these awards are as follows:
 Performance MeasuresWeightDescription
Cumulative Adjusted EBITDA60%A three-year average EBITDA growth goal measured against performance targets set at the beginning of the performance period
Adjusted Annual Operating Cash Flow40%An annual goal for each year is set at the beginning of the performance period
At the beginning of each three-year performance period, the Committee establishes the performance measures to be used for that performance period, their weightings and the levels of performance on those measures for the entire three-year performance period that will generate threshold, target, and maximum payouts. The number of performance shares delivered at the end of the three-year performance cycle may range from 0% for below threshold performance to 50% for threshold performance and up to 150%200% for maximum performance. (For fiscal 2021-2023, the maximum payout percentage was increased to 200% from 150%.) When the performance threshold is met, payouts are determined on a linear interpolation basis for performance levels between threshold and target and between target and maximum. The final Performance Share Plan payout is delivered at the end of the three-year performance cycle.
35 | saic.com

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The financial targets are closely aligned with the company’s long-term financial strategy and internal budgets, and not publicly disclosed at the time of the award issuance due to the proprietary and competitive nature of this information. Achievement and payouts for each of the above goals will be determined and disclosed by the Committee at the conclusion of fiscal 2022.2023.
Certification of fiscal 2018-20202019-2021 performance share plan awards. The Compensation Committee reviewed and approved performance against pre-established targets for the fiscal 2018-20202019-2021 plan. Payout amounts for fiscal 2018-20202019-2021 performance shares were as follows:

39    | saic.com

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Fiscal 2018-20202019-2021 Performance Share Plan Payout
 Performance MeasuresPerformance PeriodWeightThreshold
50%		Target 100%Maximum
150%
Actual(1)
% of Target
Achieved		Payout
Adjusted Cumulative Operating Income   FY19-2160%$1.386B$1.597B$1.710B$1.518B95.0%81.2%
Adjusted Operating Cash Flow  FY19$227M$267M$299M$241M90.3%67.5%
   FY2040%$419M$482M$525M$489M101.5%108.1%
   FY21$461M$538M$589M$805M149.6%150.0%
Weighted Average for Financial Goals92.2%
 Performance MeasuresPerformance PeriodWeight
Threshold
50%		Target 100%Maximum
150%
Actual(1)
% of Target
Achieved
Payout
Adjusted Cumulative Operating Income   FY18-2060%$1.030B$1.159B$1.281B$1.105B95.4%79.2%
         
Adjusted Operating Cash Flow  FY18 $205M$234M$263M$157M67.1%0.0%
    FY1940%$187M$227M$271M$229M100.9%102.3%
    FY20 $387M$445M$520M$483M108.5%125.3%
Weighted Average for Financial Goals77.9%
(1)    See the Appendix to this Proxy Statement for a reconciliation as to how each adjusted non-GAAP performance measure is calculated as compared to the most closely comparable GAAP measure.
(1)See the Appendix to this Proxy Statement for a reconciliation as to how each adjusted non-GAAP performance measure is calculated as compared to the most closely comparable GAAP measure.

Other Benefits Provided in Fiscal 20202021
In addition to the elements of direct compensation described above, we also provide our named executive officers with the following benefits:
Health and welfare benefits. Our named executive officers are entitled to participate in allthe health and welfare plans that we generally offer to all of our eligible employees, which provide medical, dental, health, group term life insurance and disability benefits. We believe that these health and welfare benefits are reasonable in scope and amount and are of the kind typically offered by other companies against which we compete for executive talent. Additionally, our named executive officers are eligible to participate in a physical health program. The program provides the named executive officers with a comprehensive medical assessment and personalized preventive strategies to maintain and improve personal health.
Retirement benefits. Our named executive officers are entitled to participate in the same defined contribution retirement plan that is generally available to all of our eligible employees. Currently, we provide matching contributions to eligible participants’ retirement plan accounts based on a percentage of their eligible compensation under applicable rules. The average amount of contributions we made to the retirement plan accounts of our named executive officers in fiscal 20202021 was approximately $8,345$11,511 per person. The Committee believes that these contributions to this retirement program permit our named executive officers to save for their retirement in a tax-effective manner, are reasonable in scope and amount and are of the kind typically offered by other companies against which we compete for executive talent.
Deferred compensation plans. To provide other tax-deferred means to save for retirement, we maintain a deferred compensation plan that allows our named executive officers and other eligible participants to elect to defer all or a portion of any cash incentive awards granted to them under our incentive plans and a portion of their eligible salary. We make no contributions to named executive officers’ accounts under these plans. Vested deferred balances under the plans will generally be paid upon retirement or termination. This plan is described in more detail under “Executive Compensation, - Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” below in this Proxy Statement.
Perquisites and personal benefits. We do not provide excessive perquisites or personal benefits to our named executive officers.


Science Applications International Corporation
2021 Proxy Statement | 36

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Other Policies and Considerations
Assessment of Risks in our Compensation Programs  
In the design and oversight of our compensation programs for named executive officers and all employees, the Committee, with assistance from the Committee’s independent compensation consultant and management, assesses risks related to our pay practices and incentive programs. The risk assessment is focused on identifying risks associated with our compensation programs and the mix of each type of compensation element we provide to our named executive officers and all employees, as well as the measures that the company may employ to mitigate those risks. The Committee believes that the following features of our compensation programs effectively mitigate excessive risk-taking that could harm our value or reward poor judgment by our named executive officers or other employees:

Science Applications International Corporation
2020 Proxy Statement | 40

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

•    short-term incentive measures are balanced among different financial measures, with goals that are intended to be achievable upon realistic levels of performance;
•    significant weighting towards long-term incentive compensation promotes long-term decision making and discourages short-term risk-taking;
•    goals are based on company performance measures, which mitigates excessive risk-taking within any particular business operation;
•    maximum payouts are capped at levels that do not reward excessive risk-taking;
•our compensation recoupment policy allows us to recover compensation based on financial results that are subsequently restated or if fraud or intentional misconduct is involved; and
•    our stock ownership guidelines encourage a long-term perspective.

Equity Award Grant Practices
The Committee is responsible for the administration of our equity incentive plans. Generally, in advance of each fiscal year, the Committee will select predetermined dates on which equity awards will be granted to our employees, including our named executive officers, during the following fiscal year. These grant dates are selected to occur after the dates we anticipate releasing our annual or quarterly financial results. We generally grant equity incentive awards to our directors, executive officers and all other eligible employees on an annual basis shortly after we announce our financial results for the recently completed fiscal year. In addition to these annual grants, the Committee predetermines four quarterly dates on which any additional equity incentive awards may be made to eligible named executive officers or other employees in connection with an offer of employment, for retention purposes or to recognize performance. The Committee approves all equity awards made to our named executive officers.
The exercise price of any option grant is determined by reference to the fair market value of the shares on the grant date, which our Amended and Restated 2013 Equity Incentive Plan defines as the closing sales price of our common stock shares on the NYSE on the trading day immediately preceding the grant date.

Stock Ownership Guidelines and Stock Holding Requirements
We encourage our employees to own our stock so that they are motivated to maximize our long-term performance and stock value. We have adopted stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers that require them to accumulate and maintain stockholdingsstock holdings calculated as a multiple of their base salary, depending on their role. The Chief Executive Officer is required to accumulate and hold shares with a value of five times her base salary and other named executive officers are required to accumulate and hold shares with a value of three times their respective base salaries.
In addition to stock ownership guidelines, we also maintain a stock holding requirements policy, which mandates that officers must hold 100% of the net shares acquired under our equity incentive programs until the applicable multiple of base salary is achieved. Ms. Keene Mr. Moraco, Mr. Scanlon, and Ms. Wheeler satisfied theirher ownership goals. Mr. Mathis,Natarajan, Mr. Genter, Mr. Mahon, and Mr. GenterLaRouche are making adequate progress toward achievement of their respective ownership goals.

Prohibition on Hedging or Pledging Company Stock or Purchasing “On Margin”
We have established policies that prohibit all executive officers, directors and employees from engaging in any short selling and hedging transactions in our securities that may carry a greater risk of liability for insider trading violations and also create an
37 | saic.com

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
appearance of impropriety. For example, with respect to our securities, our executive officers, directors and employees are not permitted to engage in any short sales or any trading in puts, calls or other derivatives on an exchange or other organized market. In addition, we prohibit our executive officers, directors and employees from pledging company stock as collateral for a loan or purchasing company stock “on margin.” Further, our executive officers, directors and employeessenior managers are required to obtain pre-clearance from our General Counsel for all transactions in our securities.

“Clawback” or Compensation Recoupment Policy
Under our “clawback” or compensation recoupment policy, the Committee may require executive officers and other employees who receive incentive compensation to return cash and equity incentives if there is a material restatement of the financial results upon which the incentive compensation was originally based. If the Committee determines that recovery is appropriate, we will seek repayment of the difference between the incentive compensation paid and the incentive compensation that would have been paid, if any, based on the restated financial results.
The policy also provides for recovery of cash and equity incentive compensation from any employee involved in fraud or intentional misconduct, whether or not it results in a restatement of our financial results. In that situation, the Committee would exercise its business judgment to determine what action it believes is appropriate under the circumstances.

41    | saic.com

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

We may seek to recover the applicable amount of compensation from incentive compensation paid or awarded after the adoption of the policy, from future payments of incentive compensation, cancellation of outstanding equity awards and reduction in or cancellation of future equity awards. In cases of fraud or misconduct, we may also seek recovery from incentive compensation paid or awarded prior to the adoption of the policy.

Post-Employment Benefits
We do not maintain a defined benefit or other supplemental retirement plan that would entitle our executive officers to receive company-funded payments if they leave the company.
Upon certain terminations of employment, including death, disability, retirement or a change in control, our employees, including our named executive officers, may be eligible for continued vesting of equity awards on the normal schedule or accelerated vesting in full or on a pro rata basis, depending on the nature of the event and the type of the award. The purpose of these provisions is to protect previously earned or granted awards by making them available following the specified event. Because these termination provisions are contained in our standard award agreements for all recipients and relate to previously granted or earned awards, we do not consider these potential termination benefits as a separate item in compensation decisions for our named executive officers. Our long-term incentive plans do not provide for additional benefits or tax gross-ups. For more information about potential post-employment benefits, see “Executive Compensation—Potential Payments upon Termination or a Change in Control” in this Proxy Statement.

Executive Severance and Change in Control Policy
We maintain an executive severance, and change in control and retirement policy which specifies the compensation and benefits payable in connection with certain termination events for our executive officers in both change in control, and non-change in control, and retirement events as further described in this Proxy Statement under “Executive Compensation—Potential Payments upon Termination or a Change in Control.” We believe that this policy provides an important benefit to us by helping alleviate any concern the executive officers might have during a potential change in control of our company and permitting them to focus their attention on our business. In addition, we believe that this policy is an important recruiting and retention tool, as many of the companies with which we compete for talent have similar arrangements in place for their senior management.
There are no excise tax gross-up provisions authorized by the policy. This policy renews for successive one-year terms each year, unless the company provides notice to the eligible executive officers of either amendments to the policy or termination of the policy or has provided notice to an individual eligible executive officer that he or she is no longer eligible for the policy no later than OctoberNovember 1 of the term year. This annual term permits the Committee to review regularly review the amount of benefits that would be provided to our executive officers in connection with certain termination events and to consider whether to continue providing those benefits.

Science Applications International Corporation
2021 Proxy Statement | 38

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Tax Deductibility of Executive Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally limits the deductibility of certain compensation in excess of $1 million paid in any one year to certain covered officers. Previously, qualified performance-based compensation was not subject to this deduction limit, if certain requirements were met.
The exemption from the Section 162(m) deduction limit for performance-based compensation was repealed, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, such that compensation paid to any “covered employee” in excess of $1 million is not deductible, unless it qualifies for transition relief applicable to certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017. A “covered employee” under Section 162(m) is any employee who has served as our CEO, CFO or other named executive officers for tax years after December 31, 2016. The rules and regulations promulgated under Section 162(m) are complicated and the transition relief under the legislation repealing Section 162(m)’s performance-based exemption from the deduction limit is complex. As such, there can be no guarantee that compensation intended to satisfy the requirements for tax deductibility in fact will.
While the Committee will continue to take into account the tax and accounting implications (including with respect to the expected lack of deductibility under the revised Section 162(m)) when making compensation decisions, it reserves the right to make compensation decisions based on other factors if the Committee determines it is in the best interests to do so. Further, taking into account the elimination of the exemption for performance-based compensation under Section 162(m), the Committee may determine to make changes or amendments to its existing compensation programs in order to revise aspects of our programs that were initially designed to comply with Section 162(m) but that may no longer serve as an appropriate incentive measure for our executive officers.

Human Resources and Compensation Committee Report
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with our management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Proxy Statement. Based upon this review and discussion, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.
Steven R. Shane (Chair)
Robert A. Bedingfield
Carol A. Goode
David M. KerkoGarth N. Graham



















Science Applications International Corporation
2020 Proxy Statement39 | 42saic.com


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth information regarding compensation earned by our named executive officers. The compensation set forth below was earned for service to SAIC during fiscal 2020,2021, and, if applicable, during fiscal 20192020 and fiscal 2018.2019. All compensation is disclosed, whether or not such amounts were paid in such year:
  Name and
  principal position
Fiscal
Year(1)
Salary
($)
Bonus
($)(2)
Stock
awards
($)(3)
Option
awards
($)(3)
Non-equity
incentive plan
compensation
($)(4)
All other
compensation
($)(5)
Total ($)
Nazzic S. Keene
Chief Executive Officer
20211,063,462— 3,150,0531,050,0081,655,70217,4776,936,702
2020961,539—2,953,210950,0141,227,00014,0856,105,848
2019734,616—1,500,006500,008985,50016,2373,736,367
Prabu Natarajan
Chief Financial Officer
202134,615500,000500,078———1,034,693
Charles A. Mathis
Former Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
2021571,154— 900,068300,017482,54313,0002,266,782
2020546,154—917,052295,015458,89812,6772,229,796
2019525,000—825,118275,004561,94015,0792,202,141
Robert S. Genter
President, Defense and Civilian Sector		2021576,923— 1,000,041250,014534,28311,4002,372,661
2020446,154—616,348—327,3379,7381,399,577
Steven G. Mahon
Executive Vice
President and General Counsel
2021596,154— 750,020250,014533,14213,7002,143,030
2020563,461—777,222250,015423,31511,6542,025,667
2019492,298—600,071200,015459,90011,1851,763,469
Michael W. LaRouche President, National Security and Space Sector2021463,462—812,592187,506432,37914,0541,909,993
  Name and
  principal position
Fiscal
Year(1)
Salary
($)
Bonus
($)(2)

Stock
awards
($)(3)

Option
awards
($)(3)

Non-equity
incentive plan
compensation
($)(4)

All other
compensation
($)(5)
Total ($)
Nazzic S. Keene
Chief Executive Officer
2020961,539—
2,953,210
950,014
1,227,000
14,0856,105,848
2019734,616—
1,500,006
500,008
985,500
16,2373,736,367
2018632,308—
1,075,138
325,002
571,375
12,1042,615,926
Anthony J. Moraco
Former Chief Executive Officer
2020545,326700,000
—
—
—
53,7461,299,072
20191,025,3851,000,000
3,375,120
1,125,004
1,691,775
17,0888,234,372
20181,000,000—
3,187,552
1,062,509
1,162,500
15,2306,427,791
Charles A. Mathis
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
2020546,154—
917,052
295,015
458,898
12,6772,229,796
2019525,000—
825,118
275,004
561,940
15,0792,202,141
2018521,154—
825,050
275,004
394,347
127,9612,143,516
Steven G. Mahon
Executive Vice
President and General Counsel
2020563,461—
777,222
250,015
423,315
11,6542,025,667
2019492,298—
600,071
200,015
459,900
11,1851,763,469
2018446,154—
450,073
150,010
322,314
10,8921,379,443
Karen A. Wheeler
Former Executive Vice
President and Chief Human Resources Officer
2020395,361—
505,252
162,505
—
1,259,2942,322,412
2019376,539—
393,876
131,269
315,127
12,8541,229,665
2018330,000—
318,835
106,257
193,389
15,484963,965
Robert S. Genter
Executive Vice
President, General Manager, Civilian Markets Customer Group
2020446,154—
616,348
—
327,337
9,7381,399,577
James J. Scanlon
Executive Vice
President, General Manager, Defense Systems Customer Group
2020446,154—
565,063
—
256,716
9,2381,277,171
(1)    Compensation is provided only for fiscal years for which each individual qualified as a named executive officer.
(1)Compensation is provided only for fiscal years for which each individual qualified as a named executive officer.
(2)This column reflects bonus payments made to Mr. Moraco in recognition of the successful execution of the corporate growth strategy in fiscal 2019 and for certain transition services provided to SAIC before his retirement in fiscal 2020.
(3)These columns reflect the grant date fair value computed in accordance with stock-based compensation accounting rules (FASB ASC Topic 718). The awards shown in the “Stock awards” column in the above table include RSUs and PSAs. Values for those PSAs are computed based on the target number of shares. Assuming the maximum level of the performance conditions is achieved, the value of the fiscal 2020 PSAs included in the “Stock Awards” column would be as follows: Ms. Keene, $2,953,210; Mr. Mathis, $917,052; Mr. Mahon, $777,222; Ms. Wheeler, $505,252; Mr. Genter, $616,348; and Mr. Scanlon, $565,063. Ms. Keene received a one-time RSU award of $100,040 in June 2017 (fiscal 2018) as an inducement to assume the Chief Operating Officer role with expanded responsibilities.
For more information regarding our application of FASB ASC Topic 718, including the assumptions used in the calculations of these amounts, please refer to Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2020 filed with the SEC on March 27, 2020.

(2)    In connection with his appointment as Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Natarajan received a sign-on bonus of $500,000.
(3)    These columns reflect the grant date fair value computed in accordance with stock-based compensation accounting rules (FASB ASC Topic 718). The awards shown in the “Stock awards” column in the above table include RSUs and PSAs. Values for those PSAs are computed based on the target number of shares. If the maximum level of the performance conditions were achieved, the value of the fiscal 2021 PSAs included in the “Stock Awards” column would be as follows: Ms. Keene, $4,200,021; Mr. Mathis, $1,200,090; Mr. Genter, $1,000,026; Mr. Mahon, $1,000,026; and Mr. LaRouche, $750,093. Mr. Natarajan received a one-time RSU grant of $500,000 in in connection with his appointment as Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Genter and Mr. LaRouche each received one-time RSU grants of $250,000 to recognize their expanded roles as Presidents of the Defense and Civilian Sector and National Security and Space Sector, respectively.
        For more information regarding our application of FASB ASC Topic 718, including the assumptions used in the calculations of these amounts, please refer to Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2021 filed with the SEC on March 26, 2021.
(4)    Amounts shown in this column represent the actual amounts paid to the named executive officers under our cash incentive award program for performance in fiscal 2021. The threshold, target and maximum payouts are shown in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table under the column headed “Estimated future payouts under non-equity incentive plan awards.”
(5)    Amounts shown in this column for fiscal 2021 include matching contributions made by the company in the SAIC Retirement Plan on behalf of our named executive officers as follows: Ms. Keene, $11,400; Mr. Mathis, $11,400; Mr. Genter, $11,400; Mr. Mahon, $11,400; and Mr. LaRouche, $11,954. Amounts shown also include payments or reimbursements of fees during fiscal 2021 related to the executive health benefit on behalf of our named executive officers as follows: Ms. Keene, $4,325; Mr. Mathis, $1,600; Mr. Mahon, $2,300; and Mr. LaRouche, $2,100. Amounts shown for Ms. Keene also include taxable transportation expenses of $1,752.
43Science Applications International Corporation
2021 Proxy Statement | saic.com40

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

(4)Amounts shown in this column represent the actual amounts paid to the named executive officers under our cash incentive award program for performance in fiscal 2020. The threshold, target and maximum payouts are shown in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table under the column headed “Estimated future payouts under non-equity incentive plan awards.”
(5)Amounts shown in this column for fiscal 2020 include matching contributions made by the company in the SAIC Retirement Plan on behalf of our named executive officers as follows: Ms. Keene, $7,738; Mr. Moraco, $6,446; Mr. Mathis, $8,777; Mr. Mahon, $9,354; Ms. Wheeler, $9,423; Mr. Genter, $7,438; and Mr. Scanlon, $9,238. Amounts shown also include payments or reimbursements of fees during fiscal 2020 related to the executive health benefit on behalf of our named executive officers as follows: Ms. Keene, $4,325; Mr. Moraco, $2,300; Mr. Mathis, $3,900; Mr. Mahon, $2,300; Mr. Genter, $2,300; and Ms. Wheeler, $3,900. Amounts shown for Ms. Keene also include association membership dues of $1,025 and taxable transportation expenses of $997. Amounts shown for Mr. Moraco also include a lump sum premium cost of $45,000 for the continuation of health insurance coverage through 18 months following his retirement. Amounts for Ms. Wheeler also include a total cash severance of $1,245,971.

Science Applications International Corporation
2020 Proxy Statement | 44

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table sets forth information regarding the cash and equity incentive awards made to our named executive officers in fiscal 20202021 pursuant to our Amended and Restated 2013 Equity Incentive Plan.
Estimated future payouts under
non-equity incentive plan awards(1)
 
Estimated future payouts under equity incentive plan awards(2)
 
All other
stock
awards;
number  of shares of stock or units (#)(3)
All other
option
awards;
number  of securities
underlying options
(#)(4)
Exercise
or base price of
option awards ($/share) (5)
Closing
market
price
on the
date of grant
($)
Grant date
fair value
of stock and
option awards ($)(6)
Name
Award
type
Grant
date
Approval
date
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)		Threshold
(#)		Target
(#)		Maximum
(#)
Ms. KeeneCash——698,7501,397,5002,795,000————— ——— 
Options04/03/202003/24/2020———————60,624 73.7771.301,050,008 
PSA04/03/202003/24/2020———14,23428,46756,934— — ——2,100,011 
RSU04/03/202003/24/2020——————14,234 — ——1,050,042 
Mr. NatarajanRSU01/04/202112/10/2020——————5,284 — ——500,078 
Mr. MathisCash— — 244,375488,750977,500———————— 
Options04/03/202003/24/2020———————17,322 73.7771.30300,017 
PSA04/03/202003/24/2020———4,0678,13416,268— — ——600,045 
RSU04/03/202003/24/2020——————4,067— ——300,023 
Mr. GenterCash— — 240,000480,000960,000————— ——— 
Options04/03/202003/24/2020———————14,435 73.7771.30250,014 
PSA04/03/202003/24/2020———3,3896,77813,556— — ——500,013 
RSU04/03/202003/24/2020——————3,389 — ——250,007 
RSU12/11/202012/10/2020——————2,509 — ——250,022 
Mr. MahonCash— — 225,000450,000900,000———— — ——— 
Options04/03/202003/24/2020——————— 14,435 73.7771.30250,014
PSA04/03/202003/24/2020———3,3896,77813,556— — ——500,013 
RSU04/03/202003/24/2020——————3,389— ——250,007 
Mr. LaRoucheCash— — 190,000380,000760,000————— ——
Options04/03/202003/24/2020———————10,826 73.7771.30187,506
PSA04/03/202003/24/2020———2,5425,08410,168— — ——375,047 
RSU04/03/202003/24/2020——————2,542 — ——187,523 
RSU12/11/202012/10/2020——————2,509 — ——250,022 
    
Estimated future payouts under
non-equity incentive plan awards(1) 
 
Estimated future payouts under equity incentive plan awards(2) 
 
All other
stock
awards;
number  of shares of stock or units (#)(3)
All other
option
awards;
number  of securities
underlying options
(#)(4)
Exercise
or base price of
option awards ($/share) (5)
Closing
market
price
on the
date of grant
($)
Grant date
fair value
of stock and
option awards ($)(6)
Name
Award
type
Grant
date
Approval
date
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)		Threshold
(#)		Target
(#)		Maximum
(#)
Ms. KeeneCash—
—
625,000
1,250,000
2,500,000
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
 Options04/05/2019
03/26/2019
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
56,853
74.97
75.91
950,014
 PSA05/22/2019
03/26/2019
—
—
—
12,672
25,344
38,016
—
—
—
—
2,003,190
 RSU04/05/2019
03/26/2019
—
—
—
—
—
—
12,672
—
—
—
950,020
Mr. MathisCash—
—
233,750
467,500
935,000
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
 Options04/05/2019
03/26/2019
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
17,655
74.97
75.91
295,015
 PSA05/22/2019
03/26/2019
—
—
—
3,935
7,870
11,805
—
—
—
—
622,045
 RSU04/05/2019
03/26/2019
—
—
—
—
—
—
3,935
—
—
—
295,007
Mr. MahonCash—
—
215,625
431,250
862,500
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
 Options04/05/2019
03/26/2019
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
14,962
74.97
75.91
250,015
 PSA05/22/2019
03/26/2019
—
—
—
3,335
6,670
10,005
—
—
—
—
527,197
 RSU04/05/2019
03/26/2019
—
—
—
—
—
—
3,335
—
—
—
250,025
Mr. GenterCash—
—
135,000
270,000
540,000
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
 Options04/05/2019
03/26/2019
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
 PSA05/22/2019
03/26/2019
—
—
—
2,001
4,002
6,003
—
—
—
—
316,318
 RSU04/05/2019
03/26/2019
—
—
—
—
—
—
4,002
—
—
—
300,030
Mr. ScanlonCash—
—
135,000
270,000
540,000
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
 Options04/05/2019
03/26/2019
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
 PSA05/22/2019
03/26/2019
—
—
—
1,835
3,669
5,504
—
—
—
—
289,998
 RSU04/05/2019
03/26/2019
—
—
—
—
—
—
3,669
—
—
—
275,065
Ms. WheelerCash—
—
145,250
290,500
581,000
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
 Options04/05/2019
03/26/2019
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
9,725
74.97
75.91
162,505
 PSA05/22/2019
03/26/2019
—
—
—
2,168
4,336
6,504
—
—
—
—
342,717
 RSU04/05/2019
03/26/2019
—
—
—
—
—
—
2,168
—
—
—
162,535
(1)    Amounts in these columns represent the threshold, target and maximum payout amounts of cash incentive awards with actual payouts based upon the achievement of pre-established levels of performance during fiscal 2021, as discussed in our CD&A in this Proxy Statement. The actual amounts that were paid to our named executive officers with respect to fiscal 2021 are set forth in the table entitled “Summary Compensation Table” under the column headed “Non-equity incentive plan compensation.”
(1)Amounts in these columns represent the threshold, target and maximum payout amounts of cash incentive awards with actual payouts based upon the achievement of pre-established levels of performance during fiscal 2020, as discussed in our CD&A in this Proxy Statement. The actual amounts that were paid to our named executive officers with respect to fiscal 2020 are set forth in the table entitled “Summary Compensation Table” under the column headed “Non-equity incentive plan compensation.”
(2)Amounts in these columns represent PSAs which are subject to performance goals related to the three-year cumulative adjusted EBITDA and adjusted annual operating cash flow. Shares are issuable at the end of the three-year performance cycle provided that the predetermined goals have been satisfied, subject to the Human Resources and Compensation Committee’s discretion to decrease the number of shares that are ultimately issued at the end of the performance cycle. The grant date fair values of the PSAs based on the target number of shares are provided in the “Summary Compensation Table” under the column headed “Stock awards.”
(3)Amounts in this column represent RSUs which vest as to 33% on the first, second, and third year anniversaries of the date of grant.
(4)Amounts in this column represent the number of shares of common stock underlying options issued in fiscal 2020. All options vest as to 33% of the underlying shares on the first, second and third year anniversaries of the date of grant.
(5)
(2)    Amounts in these columns represent PSAs which are subject to performance goals related to the three-year cumulative adjusted EBITDA and adjusted annual operating cash flow. Shares are issuable at the end of the three-year performance cycle provided that the predetermined goals have been satisfied, subject to the Human Resources and Compensation Committee’s discretion to decrease the number of shares that are ultimately issued at the end of the performance cycle. The grant date fair values of the PSAs based on the target number of shares are provided in the “Summary Compensation Table” under the column headed “Stock awards.”
(3)    Amounts in this column represent RSUs which vest as to 33% on the first, second, and third year anniversaries of the date of grant.
(4)    Amounts in this column represent the number of shares of common stock underlying options issued in fiscal 2021. All options vest as to 33% of the underlying shares on the first, second and third year anniversaries of the date of grant.
(5)    The exercise price of stock options granted under our Amended and Restated 2013 Equity Incentive Plan is the “fair market value” of our common stock on the date of grant, which is defined as the closing sales price of our common stock on the NYSE on the trading day before the grant date.

4541 | saic.com

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
(6)    Amounts represent the grant date fair value determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. These amounts do not reflect the value that may be actually realized by the recipient and do not reflect changes in our stock price after the date of grant. The values included for the performance shares awards are based on the target number of shares.

(6)Amounts represent the grant date fair value determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. These amounts do not reflect the value that may be actually realized by the recipient and do not reflect changes in our stock price after the date of grant. The values included for the performance shares awards are based on the target number of shares.

Science Applications International Corporation
2020 Proxy Statement | 46

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding options, RSUs and PSAs that were held by our named executive officers at the end of fiscal 2020.2021.
Option awards(1)
Stock awards
Name
Grant DateNumber of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options
(exercisable)
(#)		Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options
(unexercisable)
(#)
Option
exercise
price ($)
Option
expiration
date
Number of
shares of
stock or units that have not
vested (#)(2)
Market value
of shares of
stock or units
that have not
vested ($)(3)
Equity Incentive
Plan awards; number of
unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested (#)(4)
Equity Incentive Plan awards; market or payout value of unearned shares, units or
other rights that
have not vested ($)(3)
Ms. Keene04/03/2020— 60,624 73.77 04/02/202721,824 2,095,759 22,106 2,122,874 
05/22/2019— — — 8,879 852,637 16,972 1,629,847 
04/05/201918,950 37,903 74.97 04/04/20268,449 811,357 — — 
04/06/201817,300 8,651 85.31 04/05/20252,931 281,464 — — 
06/16/2017— — — 339 32,554 — — 
04/07/201719,774 — 72.91 04/06/20241,115 107,073 — — 
04/01/201629,302 — 53.34 03/31/2023— — — — 
04/10/201524,427 — 52.11 04/09/2022— — — — 
Mr. Natarajan01/04/2021— — — 5,284 507,423 — — 
Mr. Mathis04/03/2020— 17,322 73.77 04/02/20276,235 598,747 6,317 606,619 
05/22/2019— — — 2,756 264,699 5,271 506,189 
04/05/20195,884 11,771 74.97 04/04/20262,624 251,983 — — 
04/06/20189,515 4,758 85.31 04/05/20251,612 154,800 — — 
04/07/2017— — — 943 90,556 — — 
Mr. Genter12/11/2020— — — 2,509 240,939 — — 
04/03/2020— 14,435 73.77 04/02/20275,195 498,876 5,264 505,507 
05/22/2019— — — 1,402 134,638 2,680 257,349 
04/05/2019— — — 2,669 256,304 — — 
04/06/2018— — — 1,246 119,653 — — 
04/07/2017— — — 686 65,877 — — 
Mr. Mahon04/03/2020— 14,435 73.77 04/02/20275,195 498,876 5,264 505,507 
05/22/2019— — — 2,336 224,325 4,468 429,019 
04/05/20194,987 9,975 74.97 04/04/20262,224 213,571 — — 
04/06/20186,920 3,461 85.31 04/05/20251,173 112,643 — — 
04/07/20179,127 — 72.91 04/06/2024515 49,455 — — 
Mr. LaRouche12/11/2020— — — 2,509 240,939 — — 
04/03/2020— 10,826 73.77 04/02/20273,896 374,133 3,949 379,193 
05/22/2019— — — 1,168 112,180 2,234 214,509 
04/05/2019— — — 4,448 427,141 — — 
  
Option awards(1)��
Stock awards
Name 
Grant Date
Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options
(exercisable)
(#)
Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options
(unexercisable)
(#)
Option
exercise
price ($)
Option
expiration
date
Number of
shares of
stock or units that have not
vested (#)(2)
Market value
of shares of
stock or units
that have not
vested ($)(3)
Equity Incentive
Plan awards; number of
unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested (#)(4)
Equity Incentive Plan awards; market or payout value of unearned shares, units or
other rights that
have not vested ($)(3)
Ms. Keene05/22/2019—
—
—
—
4,134
362,831
19,455
1,707,596
 04/05/2019—
56,853
74.97
04/04/2026
12,672
1,112,221
—
—
 04/06/20188,650
17,301
85.31
04/05/2025
6,281
551,265
7,300
640,695
 06/16/2017—
—
—
—
678
59,508
—
—
 04/07/201713,182
6,592
72.91
04/06/2024
2,229
195,639
—
—
 04/01/201629,302
—
53.34
03/31/2023
1,395
122,439
—
—
 04/10/201524,427
—
52.11
04/09/2022
—
—
—
—
 04/11/201415,459
—
38.77
04/10/2021
—
—
—
—
Mr. Moraco04/06/2018—
38,927
85.31
04/05/2025
11,990
1,052,401
6,688
587,043
 04/07/2017—
21,549
72.91
04/06/2024
7,287
639,580
—
—
 04/01/2016—
—
—
—
4,980
437,095
—
—
Mr. Mathis05/22/2019—
—
—
—
1,283
112,640
6,042
530,276
 04/05/2019—
17,655
74.97
04/04/2026
3,935
345,375
—
—
 04/06/20184,757
9,516
85.31
04/05/2025
3,455
303,251
4,015
352,431
 04/07/201711,154
5,578
72.91
04/06/2024
1,886
165,534
—
—
Mr. Mahon05/22/2019—
—
—
—
1,088
95,459
5,120
449,425
 04/05/2019—
14,962
74.97
04/04/2026
3,335
292,713
—
—
 04/06/20183,460
6,921
85.31
04/05/2025
2,513
220,538
2,920
256,293
 04/07/20176,084
3,043
72.91
04/06/2024
1,029
90,315
—
—
 04/01/201613,082
—
53.34
03/31/2023
623
54,681
—
—
Mr. Genter05/22/2019—
—
—
—
652
57,233
3,073
269,686
 04/05/2019—
—
—
—
4,402
386,395
—
—
 04/06/2018—
—
—
—
1,869
164,042
1,551
136,158
 04/07/2017—
—
—
—
4,982
437,270
—
—
 04/01/20164,702
—
53.34
03/31/2023
1,372
120,420
—
—
 04/10/2015—
—
—
—
457
40,111
—
—
 04/11/2014—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Mr. Scanlon05/22/2019—
—
—
—
598
52,508
2,817
247,214
 04/05/2019—
—
—
—
3,669
322,028
—
—
 04/06/2018—
—
—
—
7,251
636,451
1,551
136,158
 04/07/2017—
—
—
—
1,201
105,412
—
—
 04/01/20168,619
—
53.34
03/31/2023
411
36,073
—
—
 04/10/20156,691
—
52.11
04/09/2022
—
—
—
—
 04/11/201411,805
—
38.77
04/10/2021
—
—
—
—
 04/05/20132,191
—
27.81
04/04/2020
—
—
—
—
Ms. Wheeler05/22/2019—
—
—
—
707
62,065
3,329
292,151
 04/05/2019—
9,725
74.97
04/04/2026
2,168
190,285
—
—
 04/06/20182,270
4,543
85.31
04/05/2025
1,649
144,769
1,917
168,264
 04/07/20174,309
2,156
72.91
04/06/2024
729
63,984
—
—
 04/01/2016—
—
—
—
435
38,180
—
—
 04/10/20151,189
—
52.11
04/09/2022
—
—
—
—
 04/11/20141,948
—
38.77
04/10/2021
—
—
—
—
 04/05/2013974
—
27.81
04/04/2020
—
—
—
—

(1)    Information in these columns relates to options to purchase shares of common stock held by our named executive officers at the end of fiscal 2021.
47Science Applications International Corporation
2021 Proxy Statement | saic.com42

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
(2)    Information in this column relates to RSUs held by our named executive officers at the end of fiscal 2021. RSUs vest over a three-year period in 33% installments at each anniversary of the grant date. (RSUs awarded prior to fiscal 2020 vest over a four-year period in 25% installments at each anniversary of the grant date.) Additionally, this column includes the portion of the performance share awards for the fiscal 2020-2022 and the fiscal 2021-2023 award cycles that are subject to performance goals based on annual operating cash flow for fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2021, respectively. These performance shares have been earned as of the end of fiscal 2021 based on operating cash flow performance and will vest and be settled in shares only at the end of the three-year performance cycle if the named executive officer remains employed by the company at the end of the performance cycle or is eligible for severance or retirement benefits provided under the SAIC Executive Severance, Change in Control and Retirement Policy. Award payout is subject to the Human Resources and Compensation Committee’s discretion to decrease the number of shares that are ultimately issued at the end of the performance cycle.

(1)Information in these columns relates to options to purchase shares of common stock held by our named executive officers at the end of fiscal 2020. Options granted prior to April 2014 vest as to 20%, 20%, 20% and 40% of the underlying shares on the first, second, third and fourth year anniversaries of the date of grant, respectively. Options granted in April 2014 and later vest as to 33% on the first, second and third year anniversaries of the date of grant.
(2)Information in this column relates to RSUs held by our named executive officers at the end of fiscal 2020. RSUs vest as to 33% on each of the first, second, and third anniversaries of the date of grant. (RSUs awarded prior to fiscal 2020 vest over a four-year period in 25% installments at each anniversary of the grant date.) Additionally, this column includes the portion of the PSAs for the fiscal 2019-2021 and the fiscal 2020-2022 award cycles that are subject to performance goals based on annual operating cash flow for fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2020, respectively. These performance shares have been earned as of the end of fiscal 2020 based on operating cash flow performance and will vest and be settled in shares only at the end of the three-year performance cycle if the named executive officer remains employed by the company at the end of the performance cycle. Award payout is subject to the Human Resources and Compensation Committee’s discretion to decrease the number of shares that are ultimately issued at the end of the performance cycle. Any RSUs previously deferred by our named executive officers are also reflected in the table below under the caption “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.”
(3)Based on $87.77 per share, the closing sales price of our common stock on the NYSE on January 31, 2020.
(4)The number of performance shares reflected in this column represent the performance shares awarded for the fiscal 2019-2021 and fiscal 2020-2022 performance cycles that can be earned based on the company’s cumulative operating income performance over the full three-year cycles. It also includes the performance shares awarded for 2019-2021 performance cycle that are subject to annual operating cash flow performance goals and the performance shares awarded for 2020-2022 performance cycle that are subject to the cumulative adjusted EBITDA performance goals that have not yet been earned as of the end of fiscal 2020, namely those performance shares allocated to the third one-year performance period for fiscal 2019-2021 cycle and those performance shares allocated to the second and third one-year performance periods for the fiscal 2020-2022 cycle. Vesting of PSAs for fiscal 2019-2021 is determined at the end of the three-year performance period of January 29, 2021 and vesting of PSAs for fiscal 2020-2022 is determined at the end of the three-year performance period on January 28, 2022. The number of performance shares that can be earned based on annual operating cash flow performance and the number of performance shares that can be earned based on three-year adjusted EBITDA performance has been disclosed in this column at an assumed target payout level.

(3)    Based on $96.03 per share, the closing sales price of our common stock on the NYSE on January 29, 2021.

(4)    The number of performance shares reflected in this column represent the performance shares awarded for the fiscal 2020-2022 and fiscal 2021-2023 performance cycles that can be earned based on the company’s cumulative EBITDA, as well as the performance shares awarded for those same performance cycles that are subject to annual operating cash flow performance goals and have not yet been earned as of the end of fiscal 2021, namely those performance shares allocated to the third one-year performance period for the fiscal 2020-2022 cycle and those performance shares allocated to the second and third one-year performance periods for the fiscal 2021-2023 cycle. Vesting of performance share awards for fiscal 2020-2022 is determined at the end of the three-year performance period of January 28, 2022, and vesting of performance share awards for fiscal 2021-2023 is determined at the end of the three-year performance period on February 3, 2023. The number of performance shares that can be earned based on annual operating cash flow performance and the number of performance shares that can be earned based on three-year adjusted EBITDA performance has been disclosed in this column at an assumed target payout level.

Science Applications International Corporation
2020 Proxy Statement | 48

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table sets forth information regarding shares of common stock acquired by our named executive officers during fiscal 20202021 upon the exercise of stock options, the vesting of RSUs and the vesting of fiscal 2018-20202019-2021 PSAs.
Option awardsStock awards
Name
Number of shares
acquired on exercise
(#)
Value realized
on exercise
($)(1)
Number of shares
acquired on vesting
(#)(2)
Value realized
on vesting
($)(1)
Ms. Keene15,459 893,221 19,338 1,667,939 
Mr. Mathis16,732 348,862 9,003 795,565 
Mr. Genter4,702 206,371 10,376 817,651 
Mr. Mahon13,082 611,191 7,156 622,149 
Mr. LaRouche— — 2,222 165,183 
 Option awardsStock awards
Name
Number of shares
acquired on exercise
(#)

Value realized
on exercise
($)(1)

Number of shares
acquired on vesting
(#)(2)
Value realized
on vesting
($)(1)
Ms. Keene—
—
12,6361,044,777
Mr. Moraco272,720
9,398,413
16,8381,277,836
Mr. Mathis—
—
7,624647,838
Mr. Mahon—
—
5,567465,788
Mr. Genter—
—
4,396358,751
Mr. Scanlon1,461
66,760
3,879316,405
Ms. Wheeler974
47,292
1,565118,771
(1)    Value realized on exercise or vesting disclosed above is based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the exercise or vest date; however, the actual value realized by the named executive officer was determined using the closing price on the trading date immediately preceding the exercise or vest date in accordance with the fair market value definition in the Amended and Restated 2013 Equity Incentive Plan. For the earned fiscal 2019-2021 PSAs, the value is based on the closing price per share of our common stock on the NYSE on January 29, 2021 of $96.03.
(1)Value realized on exercise or vesting disclosed above is based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the exercise or vest date, however, the actual value realized by the named executive officer was determined using the closing price on the trading date immediately preceding the exercise or vest date in accordance with the fair market value definition in the Amended and Restated 2013 Equity Incentive Plan. For the earned fiscal 2018-2020 PSAs, the value is based on the closing price per share of our common stock on the NYSE on January 31, 2020 of $87.77.
(2)Includes performance shares earned in connection with the PSA for the fiscal 2018-2020
(2)    Includes performance shares earned in connection with the PSA for the fiscal 2019-2021 performance period and a portion of time-based RSUs granted during previous fiscal years.



4943 | saic.com


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
We provided benefits to our named executive officers during fiscal 20202021 under the following nonqualified deferred compensation plans whichthat are summarized below:
The SAIC Key Executive Stock Deferral Plan was closed on December 31, 2014 and no further deferrals are allowed. Participant balances generally correspond to stock units of our common stock which may be held by a rabbi trust to fund benefits for participants. We make no contributions to participants’ accounts under the Key Executive Stock Deferral Plan. Distributions under the Key Executive Stock Deferral Plan are then made to participants in shares of common stock corresponding to the number of vested stock units held for the participant. Vested deferred balances under this plan will generally be paid upon retirement or separation from service.
The SAIC 401(k) Excess Deferral Plan ("Excess Plan") was closed on December 31, 2014 and no further deferrals are allowed. The investment options in the Excess Plan are similar to those in the SAIC Retirement Plan but do not include the SAIC Stock Fund. Vested deferred balances under this plan will generally be paid following retirement or separation from service.
The SAIC Deferred Compensation Plan became effective January 1, 2015 and is a pre-tax savings plan that allows eligible participants to defer up to 80% of their salary and cash bonus compensation as well as director retainer and meeting fees. Effective January 31, 2016, the SAIC Stock Fund was discontinued as an investment option in the Deferred Compensation Plan. Deferrals into the Deferred Compensation Plan are not included as eligible compensation for the calculation of the company match in the SAIC Retirement Plan. If there is a loss of company match in the SAIC Retirement Plan because of a deferral into the Deferred Compensation Plan, the company may, at its sole discretion, make up the difference in company matching contribution to the Deferred Compensation Plan. Participants may elect to have deferred balances paid on a specific date while they are still employed or upon retirement or separation of service.
The SAIC Management Stock Compensation Plan is a long-term incentive plan that prior to September 27, 2013 awarded tax-deferred bonuses in the form of restricted share units. Shares may be deposited to a rabbi trust to fund benefits for participants. Distributions under the Management Stock Compensation Plan are then made to participants in shares of common stock corresponding to the number of vested stock units held for the participant. Vested deferred balances under this plan will generally be paid upon retirement or separation from service. The Management Stock Compensation Plan was closed on September 27, 2013 and no further deferrals are allowed.
The following table sets forth information regarding deferrals under and aggregate earnings and withdrawals in fiscal 20202021 through our nonqualified deferred compensation plans in which the named executive officers participated. There were no company matching contributions made to the named executive officers’ accounts under any of the plans in fiscal 2020.2021.
Name(1)
Plan
Executive
contributions
in fiscal 2021
($)(2)
Aggregate
earnings in
fiscal 2021
($)(3)
Aggregate
withdrawals/
distributions
in fiscal 2021
Aggregate
balance at fiscal
year-end ($)(4)
Mr. Genter   Excess Plan— 2,157 — 18,585 
   Deferred Compensation Plan923 14,323 — 79,853 
Mr. MahonDeferred Compensation Plan105,829 334,767 — 1,673,641 
Mr. LaRoucheDeferred Compensation Plan270,864 104,084 — 464,604 
Name(1)
Plan
Executive
contributions
in fiscal 2020
($)(2)

Aggregate
earnings in
fiscal 2020
($)(3)
Aggregate
withdrawals/
distributions
in fiscal 2020
Aggregate
balance at fiscal
year-end ($)(4)

Mr. Moraco   Key Executive Stock Deferral Plan—
88,695—
364,227
  Management Stock Compensation Plan—
28,836—
118,416
    Excess Plan—
10,392—
99,240
    Deferred Compensation Plan888,286
299,475—
3,047,125
Mr. MahonDeferred Compensation Plan329,373
141,267—
1,233,045
Mr. GenterExcess Plan—
1,726—
16,429
 Deferred Compensation Plan32,746
6,101—
64,607
Mr. Scanlon   Key Executive Stock Deferral Plan—
119,493—
490,699
    Deferred Compensation Plan—
8,026—
64,936
Ms. WheelerManagement Stock Compensation Plan—
28,836—
118,416
(1)    Ms. Keene, Mr. Natarajan and Mr. Mathis are not included in this table because they did not participate in any nonqualified deferred compensation plans in fiscal 2021.
(1)Mr. Mathis and Ms. Keene are not included in this table because they did not participate in any nonqualified deferred compensation plans in fiscal 2020.
(2)
(2)    Amounts in this column include salary deferrals in fiscal 2021 and annual incentive bonus paid in fiscal 2021 for fiscal 2020 and annual incentive bonus paid in fiscal 2020 for fiscal 2019 performance. For Mr. LaRouche, $174,058 and Mr. Genter, $923 of this amount is reported as fiscal 2021 compensation in the Summary Compensation Table.
(3)    With respect to the Excess Plan and the Deferred Compensation Plan, amounts in this column represent aggregate returns on the investments elected by participants from the diverse investment options available to participants under the plans. Participants may change their investment elections at any time. The returns on the investment options available to eligible participants during fiscal 2021 ranged from 0.32% to 68.92%. The amounts in this column are not included in the Summary Compensation Table.
(4)    Amounts in this column represent the value of the holders’ accounts at the end of fiscal 2021, which includes the following amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the amounts contributed by the plan holder for the prior year: Mr. Mahon, $105,829; and Mr. LaRouche, $96,806.

 $99,423 of his amount is reported as fiscal 2020 compensation in the Summary Compensation Table.

Science Applications International Corporation
20202021 Proxy Statement | 5044

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

(3)With respect to the Key Executive Stock Deferral Plan and the Management Stock Compensation Plan, amounts in this column represent the aggregate change in value of stock units corresponding to shares of our common stock during fiscal 2020. The market value of the shares is based upon $87.77 per share, the closing sales price of our common stock on the NYSE on January 31, 2020.
With respect to the Excess Plan and the Deferred Compensation Plan, amounts in this column represent aggregate returns on the investments elected by participants from the diverse investment options available to participants under the plans. Participants may change their investment elections at any time. The returns on the investment options available to eligible participants during fiscal 2020 ranged from -3.79% to 17.01%. The amounts in this column are not included in the Summary Compensation Table.
(4)
Amounts in this column represent the value of the holders’ accounts at the end of fiscal 2020, which includes the following amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the amounts contributed by the plan holder for the prior year: Mr. Moraco, $888,286; and Mr. Mahon, $229,950. With respect to the Key Executive Stock Deferral Plan and the Management Stock Compensation Plan, the amounts represent the value of stock units corresponding to shares of common stock held by Mr. Moraco based on $87.77 per share, the closing sales price of our common stock on the NYSE on January 31, 2020. At the end of fiscal 2020, Mr. Moraco held the following number of stock units in the following plans: Key Executive Stock Deferral Plan – 4,150, and Management Stock Compensation Plan – 1,349. Ms. Wheeler held 1,349 stock units in the Management Compensation Plan. Mr. Scanlon held 5,591 stock units in the Key Executive Stock Deferral Plan.



51    | saic.com

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Potential Payments upon Termination or a Change in Control
We have an Executive Severance, and Change in Control and Retirement Policy (“Severance Policy”) that applies to designated eligible officers, including all of our active named executive officers, which became effective as of AugustJuly 1, 20192020 and which provides certain benefits to the active named executive officers upon their termination of employment under the circumstances described below, including in connection with a change in control.control or retirement. In addition, our Amended and Restated 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (“2013 Plan”) and the award agreements thereunder provide for accelerated vesting and exercisability of equity awards under the circumstances described below, including in connection with a change in control.
Severance Policy. Under the Severance Policy, if an active named executive officer is involuntarily terminated without cause or resigns for good reason within 18090 days preceding or 1221 months following a change in control, he or she will be entitled to receive a lump sum cash payment equal to two times (or three times in the case of our chief executive officer) the sum of (i) the executive officer’s then current annual base salary and (ii) the target annual incentive bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs. If the executive officer’s annual base salary was higher during the 180-day90-day period prior to the change in control, that higher amount will be used to determine the amount of the lump sum cash payment to which the executive officer is entitled. The executive officer is also entitled to receive a cash payment in an amount equal to 24 months (or 36 months in the case of our chief executive officer) of the monthly COBRA premium for continued group medical coverage for the executive officer and his or her eligible dependents, and outplacement services for a period of 12 months and up to a maximum of $25,000.$25,000, and a lump sum cash payment equal to a pro-rata portion of the executive's target annual bonus opportunity for the bonus cycle in which the termination occurs. For a change of control related termination, the named executive officer's previously granted equity awards will be governed by the terms of the 2013 Plan.
Under the terms of the Severance Policy, if an active named executive officer is involuntarily terminated without cause or resigns for good reason other than during the period before or after a change in control as described above, he or she will be entitled to receive a cash payment equal to 1.5 times (or two times in the case of our chief executive officer) the sum of (i) the executive officer’s then current annual base salary and (ii) the average of the most recent three actual annual cash bonuses (or the average of all of the actual annual cash bonuses paid if the executive officer has not been employed by us for at least three annual bonus cycles). The executive will continue to vest in all previously granted awards under the 2013 Plan per the original terms of the award, but without any minimum holding period requirements and without any proration of the award. The executive officer is also entitled to receive a cash payment in an amount equal to 18 months (or 24 months in the case of our chief executive officer) of the monthly COBRA premium for continued group medical coverage for the executive officer and his or her eligible dependents, and outplacement services for a period of 12 months and up to a maximum of $25,000.$25,000, and a lump sum cash payment equal to a pro-rata portion of the executive's annual bonus opportunity for the bonus cycle in which the executive's termination occurs to be paid per the Company's usual payment schedule at the percentage payable per the Company's fiscal year annual bonus financial performance scores.
Under the terms of the Severance Policy, if an active named executive officer intends to retire and provides the Company with at least six months advanced written notice of their termination and agrees to sign a two year non-compete agreement, he or she will be entitled to receive a cash payment in an amount equal to 18 months (or 24 months in the case of our chief executive officer) of the monthly COBRA premium for continued group medical coverage for the executive officer and his or her eligible dependents and a lump sum cash payment equal to a pro-rata portion of the executive's target annual bonus opportunity for the bonus cycle in which the termination occurs. The executive will continue to vest in all previously granted awards under the 2013 Plan per the original terms of the award, but without any minimum holding period requirements and without any proration of the award.
The Severance Policy generally defines “cause” for termination as (i) conviction, or plea of no contest, of fraud, embezzlement, theft or other felony, (ii) willful engagement in illegal conduct or gross misconduct, or (iii) failure to perform employment duties in a reasonably satisfactory manner after notice from the Company and a 30-day opportunity to cure the failure. A resignation is generally defined to be for “good reason” if it is due to (i) a material adverse change in authority, duties or responsibilities, (ii) a material reduction in base salary or target bonus, or (iii) a relocation of the individual’s principal place of employment of more than 50 miles, and the Company has failed to remedy the event or condition after receiving notice of the same. The Severance Policy defines a “change in control” in the same manner as the term is defined in our 2013 Plan, as described below.
Equity Awards. Under our 2013 Plan, the vesting of stock option and RSU awards will accelerate in full if the successor entity in a change in control does not assume or replace outstanding awards or, if such awards are assumed or replaced, the award recipient’s employment ends within 18 months after the change in control due to termination without cause or resignation for good reason. The award agreements for PSAs issued under our 2013 Plan provide that if a change in control occurs before the end of a performance period, the performance period will be terminated and an award recipient will be entitled to receive, immediately prior to the change in control, a number of shares equal to the number determined by the committee to have been earned for each fiscal year in the performance period completed before the change in control, plus a pro rata portion of the shares determined by the committee to have been earned during the year in which the change in control occurred.
45 | saic.com

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The 2013 Plan generally defines a “change in control” as (i) a merger or consolidation in which the Company is not the surviving corporation, (ii) a merger in which the Company is the surviving corporation but after which the Company’s pre-merger shareholders no longer own their Company shares, (iii) a sale of substantially all of the Company’s assets, or (iv) the acquisition, sale or transfer of more than 50% of the Company’s outstanding shares by tender offer or similar transaction. “Cause” for termination is generally defined in the 2013 Plan as employment-related dishonesty, fraud or misconduct likely to cause significant injury to the Company or its personnel, and “good reason” is defined in a manner similar to that under the Severance Policy.
Other than in the context of a change in control, RSU awards and option awards will vest in full immediately if employment ends due to death or disability, and, under those circumstances, options will remain exercisable for a period of time, which under the 2013 Plan is until the expiration date of the option award. Our PSA agreements provide that if employment ends due to death, an award recipient’s estate will be entitled to promptly receive a number of shares determined in the same manner as if a change in control had occurred on the date of death. If employment ends due to disability, a pro rata portion (based on the portion of the performance period completed prior to the employment termination) of the performance shares determined to have been earned at the end of the three-year performance period will be paid out after the end of the performance period.

Science Applications International Corporation
2020 Proxy Statement | 52

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Under our retiree vesting program, employees who retire, including our named executive officers, may continue vesting in their stock option awards if they have held those options for at least 12 months prior to retirement and they retire (i) after age 59 1/2 with at least ten years of service or (ii) after age 59 1/2when age at termination plus years of service equals at least 70. Our executive officers who retire after reaching the applicable mandatory retirement age, however, will be allowed to continue to vest in their option awards without regard to the 12 month holding requirement. Under the same conditions, executive officers may continue vesting in their RSU awards, and may receive the same pro rata payout of PSAs as applies in the event of a termination due to disability. We have the right to terminate continued vesting if a retiree violates confidentiality, non-solicitation or similar obligations to us. None of our named executive officers was eligible for a benefit under our Retiree Vesting Program as of January 31, 2020,29, 2021, the last day of our most recent fiscal year.
In any other termination scenario involving an equity award recipient, including a named executive officer, the 2013 Plan provides that all unvested RSUs, options and PSAs are forfeited. Under these circumstances, vested options remain exercisable for 90 days or until the option expiration date, if earlier. However, as noted above, the Severance policy allows designated eligible officers, including all of our active named executive officers, to continue vesting in their equity awards if the executive officer is involuntarily terminated without cause or as a result of their retirement.
Other Separation Agreements. In connection with the termination of Mr. Mathis from the Company, Mr. Mathis and the Company entered into a separation agreement that entitles Mr. Mathis to receive: (i) a Cash payment of $1,570,093, which is equal to 1.5 multiplied by the sum of Mr. Mathis' base salary and three-year average bonus payments, payable on the 60th day following the termination; (ii) a cash payment of $28,416.06, which is equal to 18 months of the monthly COBRA premium for continued group medical coverage for the executive officer and his eligible dependents; (iii) continue vesting in all previously granted awards under the 2013 Plan per the original terms of the award, but without any minimum holding period requirements and without any proration of the award; (iv) a cash payment equal to a pro-rata portion of Mr. Mathis' annual bonus opportunity for the bonus cycle in which the termination occurred, to be paid per the Company's usual payment schedule and at the percentage payable per the Company's fiscal year annual bonus financial performance scores; and (v) outplacement services for a period of 12 months and up to a maximum of $25,000.
Estimated Termination and Change in Control Payments and Benefits.The following table sets forth our estimates of the payments and benefits to be made to our named executive officers under various termination and change in control scenarios. In calculating the amounts set forth in the table, we have assumed that (i) the date of termination was January 31, 2020,29, 2021, the last business day of fiscal year 2020,2021, (ii) the date of any related change in control was the same date, and (iii) the price of our common stock was $87.77$96.03 per share, the closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on January 31, 2020.29, 2021. The table does not reflect payments and benefits that are provided on a non-discriminatory basis to salaried employees generally upon termination, nor does it reflect amounts attributable to equity-based awards that were already vested, or distributions of plan balances under our non-qualified deferred compensation plan. Because the employment of Mr. Moraco and Ms. Wheeler was terminated under circumstancesMathis is not covered byincluded in the table they have been omitted.as a result of his separation from the Company on January 4, 2021. The severance payments and benefits received by Mr. Mathis are described above under the "Other Separation Agreements" section.


53Science Applications International Corporation
2021 Proxy Statement | saic.com46

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

  NameWithout Cause or With
Good Reason Termination
(not in connection
with a Change in Control) ($)
Without Cause or With
Good Reason Termination
(in connection
with a Change in Control) (1) ($)

Death ($)
Disability ($)
Ms. Keene    
Severance(2)
3,378,915
6,750,000
—
—
Medical coverage continuation(3)
—
—
—
—
Outplacement services(4)
25,000
25,000
—
—
Stock options(5)
—
868,236
868,236
868,236
Restricted stock units(6)
—
1,917,527
1,917,527
1,917,527
Performance shares(7)
—
1,402,627
1,402,627
(9 
) 
Applicable scale back(8)
—
—
—
—
Total3,403,915
10,963,390
4,188,390
2,785,763
Mr. Mathis    
Severance(2)
1,350,193
2,035,000
—
—
Medical coverage continuation(3)
28,416
37,888
—
—
Outplacement services(4)
25,000
25,000
—
—
Stock options(5)
—
332,282
332,282
332,282
Restricted stock units(6)
—
740,216
740,216
740,216
Performance shares(7)
—
587,759
587,759
(9 
) 
Applicable scale back(8)
—
—
—
—
Total1,403,609
3,758,145
1,660,257
1,072,498
Mr. Mahon    
Severance(2)
1,393,302
2,012,500
—
—
Medical coverage continuation(3)
—
—
—
—
Outplacement services(4)
25,000
25,000
—
—
Stock options(5)
—
253,758
253,758
253,758
Restricted stock units(6)
—
606,840
606,840
606,840
Performance shares(7)
—
458,488
458,488
(9 
) 
Applicable scale back(8)
—
(627,339)—
—
Total1,418,302
2,729,247
1,319,086
860,598
Mr. Genter    
Severance(2)
1,093,113
1,440,000
—
—
Medical coverage continuation(3)
28,418
37,891
—
—
Outplacement services(4)
25,000
25,000
—
—
Stock options(5)
—
—
—
—
Restricted stock units(6)
—
692,018
692,018
692,018
Performance shares(7)
—
256,114
256,114
(9 
) 
Applicable scale back(8)
—
—
—
—
Total1,146,531
2,451,023
948,132
692,018
Mr. Scanlon    
Severance(2)
1,039,954
1,440,000
—
—
Medical coverage continuation(3)
33,170
44,227
—
—
Outplacement services(4)
25,000
25,000
—
—
Stock options(5)
—
—
—
—
Restricted stock units(6)
—
642,526
642,526
642,526
Performance shares(7)
—
246,060
246,060
(9 
) 
Applicable scale back(8)
—
—
—
—
Total1,098,124
2,397,813
888,586
642,526





  NameWithout Cause Termination 
(not in connection
with a Change in Control) ($)
Without Cause  or With
Good Reason  Termination
(in connection
with a Change in Control) (1) ($)
Retirement ($)Death ($)Disability ($)
Ms. Keene
Bonus(2)
1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 — — 
Severance(3)
4,005,917 7,417,500 — — — 
Medical coverage continuation(4)
— — — — — 
Outplacement services(5)
25,000 25,000 — — — 
Stock options(6)
2,240,466 2,240,466 2,240,466 2,240,466 2,240,466 
Restricted stock units(7)
2,655,778 2,655,778 2,655,778 2,655,778 2,655,778 
Performance shares(8)
(10)2,945,680 (10)2,945,680 (11)
Applicable scale back(9)
— — — — — 
Total10,177,161 16,534,4246,146,2447,841,9244,896,244
Mr. Natarajan
Bonus(2)
— — — — — 
Severance(3)
900,000 1,200,000 — — — 
Medical coverage continuation(4)
49,306 65,741 49,306 — — 
Outplacement services(5)
25,000 25,000 — — — 
Stock options(6)
— — — — — 
Restricted stock units(7)
507,423 507,423 507,423 507,423 507,423 
Performance shares(8)
— — — — — 
Applicable scale back(9)
— — — — — 
Total1,481,729 1,798,164 556,729 507,423 507,423 
Mr. Genter
Bonus(2)
270,000 270,000 270,000 — — 
Severance(3)
1,365,065 2,160,000 — — — 
Medical coverage continuation(4)
34,371 45,828 34,371 — — 
Outplacement services(5)
25,000 25,000 — — — 
Stock options(6)
321,323 321,323 321,323 321,323 321,323 
Restricted stock units(7)
1,027,260 1,027,260 1,027,260 1,027,260 1,027,260 
Performance shares(8)
(10)563,264 (10)563,264 (11)
Applicable scale back(9)
— — — — — 
Total3,043,0194,412,6751,652,9541,911,8471,348,583
Mr. Mahon
Bonus(2)
431,250 431,250 431,250 — — 
Severance(3)
1,502,765 2,100,000 — — — 
Medical coverage continuation(4)
— — — — — 
Outplacement services(5)
25,000 25,000 — — — 
Stock options(6)
568,499 568,499 568,499 568,499 568,499 
Restricted stock units(7)
717,842 717,842 717,842 717,842 717,842 
Performance shares(8
(10)744,309 (10)744,309 (11)
Applicable scale back(9)
— — — — — 
Total3,245,3564,586,9001,717,5912,030,6501,286,341
Mr. LaRouche
Bonus(2)
240,000 240,000 240,000 — — 
Severance(3)
1,075,524 1,710,000 — — — 
Medical coverage continuation(4)
39,333 52,444 39,333 — — 
Outplacement services(5)
25,000 25,000 — — — 
Stock options(6)
240,987 240,987 240,987 240,987 240,987 
Restricted stock units(7)
926,531 926,531 926,531 926,531 926,531 
Performance shares(8)
(10)445,143 (10)445,143 (11)
Applicable scale back(9)
— — — — — 
Total2,547,3753,640,1051,446,8511,612,6611,167,518
Science Applications International Corporation
2020 Proxy Statement47 | 54saic.com

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


(1)(1)    The change in control consequences for PSAs are the same whether or not a qualifying termination (involuntary termination without cause or resignation for good reason) occurs in connection with the change in control. With respect to option and RSU awards, the 2013 Plan also provides for accelerated vesting and exercisability of the awards if the successor corporation does not assume or replace the awards in connection with the change in control.
(2)In the case of a qualifying termination not in connection with a change in control, severance amounts represent a single lump sum payment equal to two times for Ms. Keene and 1.5 times for all other named executive officers the sum of (a) the named executive officer's fiscal 2020 base salary and (b) the average of the annual bonuses paid for fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2018. In the case of a qualifying termination in connection with a change in control, severance amounts represent a single lump sum payment equal to three times for Ms. Keene and two times for all other named executive officers of the sum of (a) the named executive officer's fiscal 2020 base salary and (b) his or her target annual bonus for fiscal 2020.
(3)In the case of a qualifying termination not in connection with a change in control, these amounts represent a lump sum cash payment of COBRA benefits for 24 months for the Chief Executive Officer and 18 months for all other named executive officers. In the case of a qualifying termination in connection with a change in control, these amounts represent a lump sum cash payment of COBRA benefits for 36 months for Ms. Keene and 24 months for all other named executive officers. Ms. Keene and Mr. Mahon do not participate in the Company’s group medical coverage.
(4)These amounts represent the maximum value to the named executive officer of outplacement counseling services to be provided for 12 months following a qualifying termination.
(5)These amounts represent the value of unvested options to purchase shares of our common stock issued under the 2013 Plan that were held by the named executive officer at the end of fiscal 2020 and whose vesting was accelerated in connection with a change in control or termination due to death or disability. The value was calculated by multiplying the number of shares subject to the option whose vesting was accelerated by the difference between the closing market price per share of our common stock on the NYSE on January 31, 2020 and the applicable option exercise price. For more information regarding the number of shares underlying unvested options held by each of the named executive officers, see the table under the caption "Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End."
(6)These amounts represent the value of RSUs issued under the 2013 Plan that were held by the named executive officer at the end of fiscal 2020 and whose vesting was accelerated in connection with a change in control or termination due to death or disability. The value was calculated by multiplying the number of RSUs whose vesting was accelerated by the closing market price per share of our common stock on the NYSE on January 31, 2020, and includes accrued dividend equivalents as of January 31, 2020. For more information regarding the number of unvested RSUs held by each of the named executive officers, see the table under the caption "Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End."
(7)These amounts represent the value of shares underlying outstanding PSAs issued under the 2013 Plan that were held by the named executive officer at the end of fiscal 2020 and whose vesting was accelerated in connection with a change in control or termination due to death. The value was calculated by multiplying the number of performance shares whose vesting was accelerated by the closing market price per share of our common stock on the NYSE on January 31, 2020, and includes accrued dividend equivalents as of January 31, 2020. The number of performance shares whose vesting was accelerated was determined based on the sum of: (i) the actual number of shares earned by each named executive officer for the part of the award allocated to our annual operating cash flow performance goals for fiscal 2019 and 2020, and (ii) either (a) for the fiscal year 2019 grant, one-third of the shares allocated to the three-year cumulative adjusted EBITDA performance goal assuming results of approximately 84.9% of target, or (b) for the fiscal year 2020 grant, one-third of the shares allocated to the three-year cumulative adjusted EBITDA performance goal assuming results of approximately 84.5% of target, each for the portion of the performance period prior to the termination of employment. The number of actual shares earned by each named executive officer based on operating cash flow for fiscal 2019 was 67.5% of target for the fiscal 2019 award, and for fiscal 2020 was 120.6% and 122.3% of target for the respective awards. Note that PSAs from fiscal 2018 are not included in this table since they are deemed to be earned as of January 31, 2020.
(8)This represents the amount by which cash severance payments would be reduced in accordance with our severance policy to avoid excise taxes which would otherwise be payable pursuant to Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code.
(9)In the event employment is terminated due to disability, a pro rata portion (based on the portion of the performance period completed prior to the employment termination) of the performance shares determined to have been earned at the end of the three-year performance period will be paid out after the end of the performance period. For PSAs addressed in this table, these determinations cannot be made until after the end of fiscal 2021 and fiscal 2022, respectively.

(2)    In the case of termination involuntarily without cause, in connection with a change in control, or due to retirement, the named executive officers receive a pro-rata portion of their target bonus. Because the assumed termination date of January 29, 2021 is the last day of the fiscal year, this column reflects the target bonus amounts of the date of termination.
(3)     In the case of a qualifying termination not in connection with a change in control, severance amounts represent a single lump sum payment     equal to two times for Ms. Keene and 1.5 times for all other named executive officers the sum of (a) the named executive officer's fiscal 2021 base salary and (b) the average of the annual bonuses paid for fiscal 2020, 2019 and 2018. In the case of a qualifying termination in connection with a change in control, severance amounts represent a single lump sum payment equal to three times for Ms. Keene and two times for all other named executive officers of the sum of (a) the named executive officer's fiscal 2021 base salary and (b) his or her target annual bonus for fiscal 2021.
(4)    In the case of a qualifying termination not in connection with a change in control, these amounts represent a lump sum cash payment of COBRA benefits for 24 months for the Chief Executive Officer and 18 months for all other named executive officers. In the case of a qualifying termination in connection with a change in control, these amounts represent a lump sum cash payment of COBRA benefits for 36 months for Ms. Keene and 24 months for all other named executive officers. Ms. Keene and Mr. Mahon do not participate in the Company’s group medical coverage.
(5)    These amounts represent the maximum value to the named executive officer of outplacement counseling services to be provided for 12 months following a qualifying termination.
(6)    These amounts represent the value of unvested options to purchase shares of our common stock issued under the 2013 Plan that were held by the named executive officer at the end of fiscal 2021 and whose vesting was accelerated in connection with a change in control, involuntary termination without cause, retirement, or termination due to death or disability. The value was calculated by multiplying the number of shares subject to the option whose vesting was accelerated by the difference between the closing market price per share of our common stock on the NYSE on January 29, 2021 and the applicable option exercise price. For more information regarding the number of shares underlying unvested options held by each of the named executive officers, see the table under the caption "Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End."
(7)    These amounts represent the value of RSUs issued under the 2013 Plan that were held by the named executive officer at the end of fiscal 2021 and whose vesting was accelerated in connection with a change in control, involuntary termination without cause, retirement, or termination due to death or disability. The value was calculated by multiplying the number of RSUs whose vesting was accelerated by the closing market price per share of our common stock on the NYSE on January 29, 2021, and includes accrued dividend equivalents as of January 29, 2021. For more information regarding the number of unvested RSUs held by each of the named executive officers, see the table under the caption "Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End."
(8)    These amounts represent the value of shares underlying outstanding PSAs issued under the 2013 Plan that were held by the named executive officer at the end of fiscal 2021 and whose vesting was accelerated in connection with a change in control, involuntary termination without cause, retirement, or termination due to death. The value was calculated by multiplying the number of performance shares whose vesting was accelerated by the closing market price per share of our common stock on the NYSE on January 29, 2021, and includes accrued dividend equivalents as of January 29, 2021. The number of performance shares whose vesting was accelerated was determined based on the sum of: (i) the actual number of shares earned by each named executive officer for the part of the award allocated to our annual operating cash flow performance goals for fiscal 2020 and 2021, and (ii) either (a) for the fiscal year 2020 grant, one-third of the shares allocated to the three-year cumulative adjusted EBITDA performance goal assuming results of approximately 82.4% of target, or (b) for the fiscal year 2021 grant, one-third of the shares allocated to the three-year cumulative adjusted EBITDA performance goal assuming results of approximately 86.8% of target, each for the portion of the performance period prior to the termination of employment. The number of actual shares earned by each named executive officer based on operating cash flow for fiscal 2020 was 112.8% of target for the fiscal 2020 award, and for fiscal 2021 was 150% and 200% of target for the respective awards. Note that PSAs from fiscal 2019 are not included in this table since they are deemed to be earned as of January 29, 2021.
(9)    Under the Severance Policy, executives either receive (a) payment in full, or (b) have their payments cutback to avoid excise taxes payable pursuant to Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, depending on which option results in receipt of the greatest amount of severance benefits by the executive on an after-tax basis.
(10)    In the event employment is terminated involuntarily without cause or due to retirement under the Severance Policy, the performance shares determined to have been earned at the end of the three-year performance period will be paid out after the end of the performance period. For PSAs addressed in this table, these determinations cannot be made until after the end of the fiscal 2022 and fiscal 2023, respectively.
(11)    In the event employment is terminated due to disability, a pro rata portion (based on the portion of the performance period completed prior to the employment termination) of the performance shares determined to have been earned at the end of the three-year performance period will be paid out after the end of the performance period. For PSAs addressed in this table, these determinations cannot be made until after the end of fiscal 2022 and fiscal 2023, respectively.

55Science Applications International Corporation
2021 Proxy Statement | saic.com48


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

CEO Pay Ratio

We are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual median total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of Nazzic S. Keene, our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) at the end of fiscal 2020. On July 31, 2019, Ms. Keene, the company’s then-serving Chief Operating Officer, succeeded Mr. Moraco as CEO of the company. The elements included in Ms. Keene’s total compensation for purposes of the CEO pay ratio described below include an annualized base salary as CEO and, therefore, the total compensation used in this ratio will not match that of the "Summary Compensation Table" of this Proxy Statement. 

2021.
Due to the acquisition of EngilityUnisys Federal on January 14, 2019,March 13, 2020, there has been a change in our employee population that we reasonably believe would result in a significant change inrequired the reexamination of our pay ratio disclosure. Therefore, we have re-identified the median employee for fiscal 20202021 as follows:

•As of December 31, 20192020 (our “Determination Date”), we collected data for all employees globally and used base pay as our consistently applied compensation measure. We identified employees within a narrow range of the estimated median and then usedemployed statistical sampling to select the median employee from within that range.
We then determined our median employee’s total compensation, including any perquisites and other benefits, in the same manner that we determine the total compensation of our named executive officers for purposes of the "SummarySummary Compensation Table"Table disclosed above. The median employee's total compensation in fiscal 20202021 was comprised of base salary and additional overtime compensation. 

401(k) plan contributions.
Based on the above calculations, for fiscal 2020,2021, our last completed fiscal year:
•the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of our company (other than our CEO) was $93,568;$99,823; and
•the “annualized” total compensation of our CEO was $6,162,984.$6,936,702.
Therefore, we reasonably estimate that the ratio of our CEO’s annual total compensation to the annual total compensation of our median employee for fiscal 2020 was 66:69:1. Our pay ratio estimate has been calculated in a manner consistent with item 401(u) of Regulation S-K.





Science Applications International Corporation
2020 Proxy Statement49 | 56saic.com


PROPOSAL 43 - RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

PROPOSAL 43 - RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
The Audit Committee believes that the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP ("EY") is in the best interests of the company and its stockholders, and proposes and recommends that the stockholders ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of EY as our independent registered public accounting firm to audit our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending January 29, 2021.28, 2022. Representatives of EY will be present at the virtual annual meeting to respond to appropriate questions and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so.
Stockholders are not required to ratify the appointment of EY as our independent registered public accounting firm. However, we are submitting the appointment for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If stockholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will consider whether or not to retain EY. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that a change in accounting firms would be in our stockholders’ best interests.

Vote Required
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of common stock present or represented and entitled to vote at the virtual annual meeting is required to approve the proposal. Abstentions have the effect of a vote against the proposal, and broker “non-votes” have no effect on the outcome of the proposal. Shares of common stock represented by properly executed, timely received and unrevoked proxies will be voted in accordance with the instructions indicated thereon. In the absence of specific instructions, properly executed, timely received and unrevoked proxies will be voted “FOR” the proposal.

Recommendation of the Board
The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 29, 2021.28, 2022.
 

57Science Applications International Corporation
2021 Proxy Statement | saic.com50


AUDIT MATTERS

AUDIT MATTERS

Audit Committee Report
The Audit Committee of the Board is responsible for assisting the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities over the company’s accounting, auditing and financial reporting processes, internal controls, and for monitoring compliance with certain regulatory and legal requirements. The responsibilities of the Audit Committee are described in a written charter that has been reviewed and approved by the Board. The current Audit Committee charter is available on the company’s Investorinvestor relations website at investors.saic.com by clicking on the link entitled “Corporate Governance.” A summary of the provisions of the Audit Committee charter, including the responsibilities of the Audit Committee, is set forth in this Proxy Statement under "Corporate Governance – Audit Committee," beginning on page 19.
Management is responsible for preparing the company’s financial statements and for the financial reporting process, including evaluating the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting.
Ernst & Young LLP ("EY"),EY, the company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the company's fiscal year ended January 31, 2020,2021, is responsible for performing an independent audit of the company’s annual consolidated and combined financial statements and expressing an opinion on the conformity of the financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Each current Audit Committee member (Robert A. Bedingfield, Yvette M. Kanouff, David M. Kerko, Timothy J. Mayopoulos and Steven R. Shane) meets the independence and financial literacy requirements of the SEC and the NYSE as well as qualifies as an audit committee financial expert under SEC rules. For a further description of each Audit Committee member’s background and expertise, please refer to the director qualification section of this Proxy Statement beginning on page 10.
In the course of fulfilling its responsibilities, the Audit Committee has:
•    evaluated the qualifications, performance and compensation of the company’s independent auditor (EY);
•    separately met with the internal auditor and EY to discuss any matters that the internal auditor, EY or the Audit Committee believed should be discussed privately without members of management present;
•    reviewed and discussed with EY the items required to be disclosed under the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and the SEC;
•    received written disclosures and the letter from EY regarding its independence required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB, and discussed with EY its independence;
•    reviewed and discussed with management and EY the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
•    reviewed and discussed with management and EY the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2020.2021.
Based on the reviews and discussions summarized in this report and subject to the limitations on our role and responsibilities referred to above and contained in the Audit Committee charter, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the company’s audited consolidated financial statements referred to above be included in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 20202021 for filing with the SEC.
Robert A. Bedingfield (Chair)
Yvette M. Kanouff
David M. Kerko
Timothy J. Mayopoulos
Steven R. Shane
 
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee of the Board has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements for the company's fiscal year ending January 29, 2021.28, 2022. Stockholders are being asked to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP at the annual meeting, as described above.

Science Applications International Corporation
2020 Proxy Statement51 | 58saic.com


AUDIT MATTERS

Audit and Non-Audit Fees
Aggregate fees billed to the company for fiscal 20202021 and fiscal 20192020 by our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP ("EY"),EY, were as follows:
January 29, 2021January 31, 2020
Audit Fees(1)
$5,200,000$5,000,000
Audit-Related Fees(2)
$—$931,139
Tax Fees(3)
$23,068$115,739
All Other Fees(4)
$—$581,493
Total Fees$5,223,068$6,628,371
 January 31, 2020
February 1, 2019
Audit Fees(1)
$5,000,000
$3,070,000
Audit-Related Fees(2)
$931,139
$910,000
Tax Fees(3)
$115,739
$135,750
All Other Fees(4)
$581,493
$363,553
Total Fees$6,628,371
$4,479,303
(1)    Audit Fees consist of professional services rendered for the audit of the annual consolidated financial statements, including the audit of internal controls pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the review of quarterly consolidated financial statements. Audit fees also include services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with the audit, such as consents and certain other company filings and submissions with the SEC.
(1)Audit Fees consist of professional services rendered for the audit of the annual consolidated financial statements, including the audit of internal controls pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the review of quarterly consolidated financial statements. Audit fees also include services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with the audit, such as consents and certain other company SEC filings and submissions.
(2)Audit-Related Fees reflect fees for services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the company’s financial statements. For fiscal 2020, this included fees related to the company's implementation of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 842, Leases, and due diligence services. For fiscal 2019, this included fees related to the company’s adoption of ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, and fees for audit services related to the acquisition of Engility.
(3)Tax Fees include a variety of permissible tax services related to preparation and/or review of statutory tax filings within U.S., foreign, and state jurisdictions, general tax advisory services (including research and discussions related to tax compliance matters) and assistance with credits and incentives opportunities in various jurisdictions.
(4)All Other Fees for fiscal 2020 related to advisory fees in connection with one of the company's customer contracts. For fiscal 2019, these fees related to advisory fees in connection with Service Organization Controls 2 readiness for one of the company’s customer contracts, delivery and training on various SharePoint templates, and workforce optimization advisory services.
(2)    Audit-Related Fees reflect fees for services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the company’s financial statements. For fiscal 2020, this included fees related to the company's implementation of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 842, Leases, and due diligence services.
(3)    Tax Fees include a variety of permissible tax services related to preparation and/or review of statutory tax filings within U.S., foreign, and state jurisdictions, general tax advisory services (including research and discussions related to tax compliance matters) and assistance with credits and incentives opportunities in various jurisdictions.
(4)    All Other Fees for fiscal 2020 related to advisory fees in connection with one of the company's customer contracts.
The Audit Committee has considered whether the above services provided by EY are compatible to maintaining the independence of EY. The Audit Committee has the responsibility to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm in advance. Further, the Chair of the Audit Committee has the authority to pre-approve audit and non-audit services as necessary between regular meetings of the Audit Committee, provided that any of those services that were pre-approved in that manner will be disclosed to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. All of the Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees, non-audit Tax Fees, and All Other Fees set forth above were pre-approved by one of these means.


59Science Applications International Corporation
2021 Proxy Statement | saic.com52


OTHER INFORMATION

OTHER INFORMATION

Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
The following table provides information regarding the beneficial ownership of each person known by us to beneficially own more than five percent of SAIC common stock as of April 7, 2020.6, 2021.
Name and address of beneficial ownerAmount and nature of beneficial ownershipPercent of class
Wellington Management Group LLP(1)
5,954,53310.3%
c/o Wellington Management Company LLP 280 Congress Street
  Boston, MA 02210
The Vanguard Group(2)
5,228,7379.0%
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
BlackRock, Inc.(3)
4,874,7728.4%
  55 East 52nd Street
  New York, NY 10055
Boston Partners(4)
4,100,9857.1%
One Beacon Street, 30th Floor
Boston, MA 02108
(1)    Information shown is based on information reported by the filer on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2021 in which Wellington Management Group LLP, an investment adviser filing on behalf of itself and as parent of certain holding companies and the Wellington Investment Advisers, reported that it has shared voting power over 5,160,117 shares and shared dispositive power over 5,954,533 shares.
(2)    Information shown is based on information reported by the filer on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2021 in which The Vanguard Group, an investment adviser filing on behalf of itself and certain of its subsidiaries, reported that it has shared voting power over 38,767 shares, sole dispositive power over 5,148,099 shares and shared dispositive power over 80,638 shares.
(3)    Information shown is based on information reported by the filer on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 1, 2021 in which BlackRock, Inc., a holding company filing on behalf of itself and certain of its subsidiaries, reported that it has sole voting power over 4,688,457 shares and sole dispositive power over 4,874,772 shares.
(4)    Information shown is based on information reported by the filer on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 11, 2021 in which Boston Partners, an investment adviser filing on behalf of itself, reported that it has sole voting power over 2,984,161 shares, shared voting power over 6,477 shares and sole dispositive power over 4,100,985 shares.

Name and address of beneficial ownerAmount and nature of beneficial ownership
Percent of class
BlackRock, Inc.(1)
6,198,792
10.7%
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055
  
The Vanguard Group(2)
5,446,356
9.4%
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
  
General Atlantic LLC(3)
4,032,200
7.0%
c/o General Atlantic Services Company, L.P.
55 East 52nd Street, 33rd Floor
New York, NY 10055

  
Boston Partners(4)
3,117,604
5.4%
One Beacon Street, 30th Floor
Boston, MA 02108
  
(1)Information shown is based on information reported by the filer on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 4, 2020 in which BlackRock, Inc., a holding company filing on behalf of a number of its subsidiaries, reported that it has sole voting power over 6,085,601 shares and sole dispositive power over 6,198,792 shares.53 | saic.com

(2)Information shown is based on information reported by the filer on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 12, 2020 in which The Vanguard Group, an investment adviser filing on behalf of itself and two wholly-owned subsidiaries, reported that it has sole voting power over 118,938 shares, shared voting power over 10,978 shares, sole dispositive power over 5,322,663 shares and shared dispositive power over 123,693 shares.OTHER INFORMATION
(3)Information shown is based on information reported by the filer on a Schedule13G filed with the SEC on January 24, 2019 in which General Atlantic LLC, a private equity firm filing on behalf of itself and seven affiliates, reported that it has shared voting power and shared dispositive power over 4,032,200 shares.
(4)Information shown is based on information reported by the filer on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 11, 2020 in which Boston Partners, an investment adviser filing on behalf of itself, reported that it has sole voting power over 2,607,844 shares, shared voting power over 4,695 shares and sole dispositive power over 3,117,604 shares.

Stock Ownership of Directors and Officers
The following table sets forth, as of April 7, 2020,6, 2021, the beneficial ownership of our common stock by our directors, the named executive officers, and all of our directors and executive officers as a group. None of our directors or executive officers beneficially own more than one percent of our common stock. As a group, our directors and executive officers beneficially own approximately [0.86]%.97% of our common stock. Unless otherwise indicated, each individual has sole investment power and sole voting power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by that individual, except for any investment or voting power that may be shared with a spouse. No shares have been pledged.

  Beneficial Owner
Common stock(1)
Stock units(2)
Options and RSUs(3)
Total shares beneficially owned
Non-Employee Directors
Robert A. Bedingfield30,406 2,839 19,215 52,460 
Carol A. Goode899 — 3,740 4,639 
Garth N. Graham— — — — 
John J. Hamre14,321 — 10,185 24,506 
Yvette M. Kanouff2,399 — 3,740 6,139 
Timothy J. Mayopoulos5,664 — 19,215 24,879 
Katharina G. McFarland1,932 — 6,047 7,979 
Donna S. Morea15,874 — 28,229 44,103 
Steven R. Shane23,429 — 19,215 42,644 
Named Executive Officers
Nazzic S. Keene73,556 — 158,677 232,233 
Prabu Natarajan3,000 — — 3,000 
Charles A. Mathis (4)
12,512 — 32,131 44,643 
Robert S. Genter13,186 — 5,497 18,683 
Steven G. Mahon19,321 — 34,808 54,129 
Michael W. LaRouche4,015 — 3,608 7,623 
All directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons)220,514 2,839 344,307 567,660 
(1)    Information in this column includes (a) the approximate number of shares allocated to all directors and officers as a group, 136,963 shares, and (b) shares held by certain trusts established by the individuals as follows: Mr. Bedingfield, 21,392 shares; Mr. Shane, 2,000 shares; and Ms. Keene, 60,159 shares.
Science Applications International Corporation
2020 Proxy Statement | 60

(2)    Represents vested stock units attributable to the individual or the group in the Key Executive Stock Deferral Plan. Shares held in these plans are voted by the trustee in the same proportion as all other stockholders collectively vote their shares of common stock.
OTHER INFORMATION
(3)    Shares subject to options exercisable or RSUs subject to vesting, both within 60 days following April 6, 2021.

(4)     Based solely on information set forth in Mr. Mathis' Form 4 filed with the SEC on July 13, 2020.

  Beneficial Owner
Common stock(1)

Stock units(2)

Options and RSUs(3)
Total shares beneficially owned
Current Non-Employee Directors    
Robert A. Bedingfield13,826
2,789
34,06150,676
Carol A. Goode—
—
2,9052,905
John J. Hamre13,033
—
9,73922,772
Yvette M. Kanouff—
—
2,9052,905
David M. Kerko—
—
6,2456,245
Timothy J. Mayopoulos6,561
—
18,76925,330
Katharina G. McFarland—
—
6,2456,245
Donna S. Morea10,826
—
34,06144,887
Steven R. Shane12,826
—
34,06146,887
Current Named Executive Officers    
Nazzic S. Keene36,510
—
125,212161,722
Charles A. Mathis4,810
—
32,13136,941
Steven G. Mahon6,382
—
34,11640,498
Robert S. Genter1,152
—
4,7025,854
James J. Scanlon12,207
5,591
27,11544,913
All directors and executive officers as a group (14 persons)118,133
8,380
372,267498,780
(1)Information in this column includes (a) the approximate number of shares allocated to the account of the individual by the trustee of the SAIC Retirement Plan as follows: Mr. Scanlon, 4,604 shares; and all directors and officers as a group, 65,338 shares, (b) shares held by certain trusts established by the individuals as follows: Mr. Bedingfield, 12,631 shares; Mr. Shane, 2,000 shares; and Ms. Keene, 36,324 shares.
(2)Represents vested stock units attributable to the individual or the group in the Key Executive Stock Deferral Plan. Shares held in these plans are voted by the trustee in the same proportion as all other stockholders collectively vote their shares of common stock.
(3)
Shares subject to options exercisable or RSUs subject to vesting, both within 60 days following April 7, 2020.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules of the SEC require our directors and executive officers as well as persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of our common stock to file reports of their ownership and changes in ownership of common stock with the SEC. For our directors and executive officers, our personnel generally prepare and file these reports on the basis of information obtained from each director and officer and pursuant to a power of attorney. Due to an administrative oversight on the part of the company, an amended Form 3 for Mr. Scanlon was filed late during fiscal 2020 with respect to unintentionally omitted shares of common stock from Mr. Scanlon's original Form 3. Due to an administrative oversight on the part of the company, an amended Form 4 for each of Messrs. Bedingfield and Scanlon was filed during fiscal 2020 with respect to unintentionally omitted shares of common stock from each original Form 4. Based solely on the information provided to us, we believe that all other reports required by Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, to be filed by our directors, executive officers and greater than ten percent stockholders complied with all filing requirements under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act during fiscal 2020, were filed on time with the SEC.2021.

Science Applications International Corporation
2021 Proxy Statement | 54

OTHER INFORMATION
Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations for the 20212022 Annual Meeting
Stockholders who, in accordance with Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, wish to present proposals for inclusion in the proxy materials to be distributed in connection with next year’s annual meeting must submit their proposals so they are received by our Corporate Secretary no later than the close of business (5:00 p.m. ET) on December 24, 2020.22, 2021. As the rules of the SEC make clear, simply submitting a proposal does not guarantee that it will be included.
In order to be properly brought before the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 20212022 (the "2021"2022 Annual Meeting"), a stockholder who desires to provide notice of nomination of one or more director candidates to be included in the company’s

61    | saic.com

OTHER INFORMATION

proxy statement and ballot pursuant to Section 3.17 of our bylaws (a “proxy access nomination”) must be received by our Corporate Secretary no earlier than November 23, 202022, 2021 and no later than the close of business on December 23, 202022, 2021 (not later than the close of business on the 120th day nor earlier than the close of business on the 150th day prior to the first anniversary of the date the definitive proxy statement was first released to stockholders in connection with the preceding year’s annual meeting of stockholders). If the date of the 20212022 Annual Meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 70 days after that anniversary date, notice of the proxy access nomination by the stockholder to be timely must be received not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to the 20212022 Annual Meeting or the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which the notice of proxy access nomination is mailed or public announcement of the date of the 20212022 Annual Meeting is first made by the company, whichever first occurs.
In addition, in order for a stockholder to propose any matter for consideration at the 20212022 Annual Meeting other than by inclusion in the proxy statement, the stockholder must give timely notice to our Corporate Secretary of his or her intention to bring such business before the meeting. To be timely, notice must be delivered to the Corporate Secretary not later than the close of business on the 90th day, nor earlier than the close of business on the 120th day, prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting. Therefore, in connection with the 20212022 Annual Meeting, notice must be delivered to the Corporate Secretary between February 3, 20212, 2022 and March 5, 2021.4, 2022. In the event, however, that the date of the annual meeting2022 Annual Meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 70 days after such anniversary date, notice by the stockholder must be delivered not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the 90th day prior to such annual meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by us, whichever occurs later.
Any stockholder’s notice must include additional information about the stockholder and the underlying beneficial owner, if any, required under our bylaws, as amended from time to time, and SEC rules and regulations, including the information that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of any proposed nomination of one or more director candidates. A stockholder’s notice must be updated, if necessary, so that the information submitted is true and correct as of the record date for determining stockholders entitled to receive notice of the meeting.

Annual Report on Form 10-K
We will provide without charge to any stockholder, upon written or oral request, a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 20202021 without exhibits. Requests should be directed to SAIC, 12010 Sunset Hills Road, Reston, Virginia 20190, Attention: Corporate Secretary, or by calling (703) 676-2064.
By Order of the Board of Directors

a160631smahonsblacka021a.jpg
Steven G. Mahon
Corporate Secretary
April 22, 202021, 2021

Science Applications International Corporation
2020 Proxy Statement55 | 62saic.com


APPENDIX TO PROXY STATEMENT

APPENDIX TO PROXY STATEMENT

This appendix describes the non-GAAP financial measures included in the Proxy Statement. While we believe that these non-GAAP financial measures may be useful in evaluating our financial information, they should be considered as supplemental in nature and not as a substitute for financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. Other companies may define similar measures differently.
Year Ended
January 29, 2021January 31, 2020February 1,2019
(in millions)
Net income$211 $229 $137 
Interest expense and loss on sale of receivables124 90 53 
Interest income(1)(4)(3)
Provision for income taxes60 57 33 
Depreciation and amortization179 131 47 
EBITDA(1)
$573 $503 $267 
EBITDA as a percentage of revenues8.1 %7.9 %5.7 %
Acquisition and integration costs54 48 86 
Restructuring costs4 — — 
Depreciation included in acquisition and integration costs(1)(5)— 
Recovery of acquisition and integration costs and restructuring costs(2)
(3)(8)— 
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
$627 $538 $353 
Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of revenues8.9 %8.4 %7.6 %
 Year Ended
 January 31,
2020
February 1,
2019
February 2,
2018
 (in millions)
Net income$229$137$179
Interest expense90
53
44
Interest income(4)(3)(1)
Provision for income taxes57
33
35
Depreciation and amortization131
47
44
EBITDA(1)
$503$267$301
EBITDA as a percentage of revenues7.9%5.7%6.8%
Acquisition and integration costs48
86
—
Restructuring costs—
—
13
Depreciation included in restructuring costs and acquisition and integration costs(5)—
(1)
Recovery of acquisition and integration costs(2)
(8)—
—
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
$538$353$313
Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of revenues8.4%7.6%7.0%
(1)EBITDA is a performance measure that is calculated by taking net income and excluding interest expense, interest income, provision for income taxes, and depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is a performance measures that excludes restructuring and acquisition and integration costs that we do not consider to be indicative of our ongoing operating performance. Integration costs excluded are costs to integrate acquired companies and include the costs of strategic consulting services, facility consolidation and employee severance. The acquisition and integration costs relate to the company’s significant acquisitions of Engility in January 2019 and Unisys Federal in March 2020.(1)    EBITDA is a performance measure that is calculated by taking net income and excluding interest expense and loss on sale of receivables, interest income, provision for income taxes, and depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is a performance measures that excludes restructuring and acquisition and integration costs that we do not consider to be indicative of our ongoing operating performance. Integration costs excluded are costs to integrate acquired companies and include the costs of strategic consulting services, facility consolidation and employee severance. The acquisition and integration costs relate to the company’s significant acquisitions of Unisys Federal in March 2020 and Engility in January 2019. We believe that these performance measures provide management and investors with useful information in assessing trends in our ongoing operating performance and may provide greater visibility in understanding the long-term financial performance of the Company.
(2)Adjustment to reflect the portion of acquisition and integration costs recovered through the company's indirect rates in accordance with Cost Accounting Standards.


(2)    Adjustment to reflect the portion of acquisition and integration costs and restructuring costs recovered through the company's indirect rates in accordance with Cost Accounting Standards.









63Science Applications International Corporation
2021 Proxy Statement | saic.com56

APPENDIX TO PROXY STATEMENT

In addition to the above non-GAAP financial measures, the table below describes adjusted performance measures related to the Performance Share Plan and Short-Term Incentive ("STI") Awards included in the Proxy Statement.

Year EndedYear Ended
January 31,
 2020

February 1,
 2019

February 2,
 2018

January 29, 2021January 31, 2020February 1,2019
(in millions)(in millions)
Performance Share Plan Adjusted Performance Measures Performance Share Plan Adjusted Performance Measures
Operating income$370$220$256
Operating income as a percentage of revenues5.8%4.7%5.7%
Restructuring costs—
—
13
Net incomeNet income$211 $229 $137 
Interest expense and loss on sale of receivablesInterest expense and loss on sale of receivables124 90 53 
Interest incomeInterest income(1)(4)(3)
Provision for income taxesProvision for income taxes60 57 33 
Depreciation and amortizationDepreciation and amortization179 131 47 
EBITDA(1)
EBITDA(1)
$573 $503 $267 
EBITDA as a percentage of revenuesEBITDA as a percentage of revenues8.1 %7.9 %5.7 %
Acquisition and integration costs48
86
—
Acquisition and integration costs52 35 86 
Recovery of acquisition and integration costs(8)—
—
Adjusted operating income(1)
$410$306$269
Adjusted operating income as a percentage of revenues6.4%6.6%6.0%
Amortization of acquired intangibles94
24
20
Restructuring costs—
—
(13)
Acquisition and integration costs(5)—
—
Performance share plan adjusted operating income$499$330$276
Performance share plan adjusted operating income as a percentage of revenues7.8%7.1%6.2%
Restructuring impactsRestructuring impacts2 — — 
Performance share plan adjusted EBITDAPerformance share plan adjusted EBITDA$627 $538 $353 
Performance share plan adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of revenuesPerformance share plan adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of revenues8.9 %8.4 %7.6 %
 
Cash flows provided by operating activities$458$184$217Cash flows provided by operating activities$755 $458 $184 
Excess tax benefits on stock based compensation(4)(9)(22)Excess tax benefits on stock based compensation3 (4)(9)
Cash paid for acquisition and integration costs27
59
—
Cash paid for acquisition and integration costs32 18 59 
Tax reform impact(31)(28)(3)
Restructuring impactsRestructuring impacts(2)— — 
Platform integration program working capital changes33
23
(35)Platform integration program working capital changes17 17 7 
Performance share plan adjusted operating cash flow$483$229$157Performance share plan adjusted operating cash flow$805 $489 $241 
 
Short-Term Incentive Adjusted Performance Measures Short-Term Incentive Adjusted Performance Measures
Revenue$6,379$4,659$4,454Revenue$7,056 $6,379 $4,659 
Engility revenue—
(98)—
Engility revenue— — (98)
Government shutdown impact—
24
—
Government shutdown impact— — 24 
Revenues from former Parent—
—
(6)
COVID-19 impactCOVID-19 impact262 — — 
STI adjusted revenue$6,379$4,585$4,448STI adjusted revenue$7,318 $6,379 $4,585 
 
Net income(3)
$229$156
(2) 

Interest expense90
53
(2) 

Net income(2)
Net income(2)
$211 $229 $156 
Interest expense and loss on sale of receivablesInterest expense and loss on sale of receivables124 90 53 
Interest income(4)(3)
(2) 

Interest income(1)(4)(3)
Provision for income taxes(3)
57
41
(2) 

Depreciation and amortization(3)
131
43
(2) 

Provision for income taxes(2)
Provision for income taxes(2)
60 57 41 
Depreciation and amortization(2)
Depreciation and amortization(2)
179 131 43 
EBITDA(1)
$503$290
(2) 

EBITDA(1)
$573 $503 $290 
EBITDA as a percentage of revenues7.9%6.4%
(2) 

EBITDA as a percentage of revenues8.1 %7.9 %6.2 %
Acquisition and integration costs35
54
(2) 

Acquisition and integration costs52 35 54 
Restructuring impactsRestructuring impacts2 — — 
COVID-19 impactCOVID-19 impact16 — — 
Impact of government shutdown—
3
(2) 

Impact of government shutdown— — 3 
STI adjusted EBITDA$538$347
(2) 

STI adjusted EBITDA$643 $538 $347 
 
Cash flows provided by operating activities(4)(3)
$458$215$217$755 $458 $215 
Cash paid for acquisition and integration costs—
35
—
Cash paid for acquisition and integration costs— — 35 
Impact from government shutdown—
21
—
Impact from government shutdown— — 21 
Excess tax benefits on stock based compensation(4)(9)(22)Excess tax benefits on stock based compensation3 (4)(9)
Contract collections—
—
19
Cash paid for restructuring costs—
—
5
Impact from sale of receivables under Master Accounts Receivable Purchase AgreementImpact from sale of receivables under Master Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement(185)— — 
COVID-19 impactCOVID-19 impact(73)— — 
Restructuring impactsRestructuring impacts(2)— — 
STI adjusted operating cash flow$454$262$219STI adjusted operating cash flow$498 $454 $262 
Science Applications International Corporation
2020 Proxy Statement57 | 64saic.com

APPENDIX TO PROXY STATEMENT
(1)    EBITDA is a non-GAAP performance measure that is calculated by taking net income and excluding interest expense and loss on sale of receivables, interest income, provision for income taxes, and depreciation and amortization. We believe that this performance measure provides management and investors with useful information in assessing trends in our ongoing operating performance and may provide greater visibility in understanding the long-term financial performance of the company.

(1)
Adjusted operating income is a non-GAAP performance measure that excludes restructuring and acquisition and integration costs that we do not consider to be indicative of our ongoing operating performance. The acquisition and integration costs relate to the company’s significant acquisition of Engility in January 2019 and Unisys Federal in March 2020. EBITDA is a non-GAAP performance measure that is calculated by taking net income and excluding interest expense, interest income, provision for income taxes, and depreciation and amortization. We believe that these performance measures provide management and investors with useful information in assessing trends in our ongoing operating performance and may provide greater visibility in understanding the long-term financial performance of the company.
(2)Information not included as this financial measure was not applicable for determining STI award amounts for this fiscal year.
(3)(2)    The STI performance goals for fiscal 2019 were based on the company's standalone financial information and excluded $19 million of net loss, $8 million of provision for income taxes (benefit) and $4 million of depreciation and amortization related to Engility during the period from January 14, 2019 through February 1, 2019. No adjustments were made to the other fiscal years presented.
(4)The STI performance goals for fiscal 2019 were based on SAIC standalone financial information and excluded $31 million of cash flows used in operating activities related to Engility during the period from January 14, 2019 through February 1, 2019. No adjustments were made to the other fiscal years presented.


(3)    The STI performance goals for fiscal 2019 were based on SAIC standalone financial information and excluded $31 million of cash flows used in operating activities related to Engility during the period from January 14, 2019 through February 1, 2019. No adjustments were made to the other fiscal years presented.


65Science Applications International Corporation
2021 Proxy Statement | saic.com58


saicproxycard1bo11a.jpg
saicproxycard1b01.jpg



saicproxycard2bo11a.jpg
saicproxycard2b01.jpg